IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v5y2003i4p471-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The multi-layer problem in implementation research

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hill
  • Peter Hupe

Abstract

This article argues that many discussions of implementation deal inadequately with the fact that several layers of government are often involved in policy processes. It thus identifies a multi-layer problem in the literature on implementation, and explores its dimensions. It argues that a failure to deal adequately with the problem leads to two particular pitfalls. One is that the notion of ‘dashed’ expectations on the part of one layer suggests either that there has been a failure of control, or that there have been interventions in the policy process that are seen as illegitimate. The other is that the relationship between layers is a simple and uniform phenomenon that can be expected to have similar characteristics in dissimilar situations. It then offers some proposals to deal with these pitfalls, and looks at what this reframing of the problem means for implementation research.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hill & Peter Hupe, 2003. "The multi-layer problem in implementation research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 471-490, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:5:y:2003:i:4:p:471-490
    DOI: 10.1080/1471903032000178545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1471903032000178545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1471903032000178545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ocp:rpaper:pp-1703 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bos, J.J. & Brown, R.R., 2014. "Assessing organisational capacity for transition policy programs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Hildebrand Sean, 2015. "Coerced Confusion? Local Emergency Policy Implementation After September 11," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 273-298, June.
    4. Gaitonde, Rakhal & San Sebastian, Miguel & Muraleedharan, V.R. & Hurtig, Anna-Karin, 2017. "Community Action for Health in India’s National Rural Health Mission: One policy, many paths," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 82-90.
    5. May, Anthony D. & Page, Matthew & Hull, Angela, 2008. "Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 328-340, November.
    6. Marco Giulio & Giancarlo Vecchi, 2019. "Multilevel policy implementation and the where of learning: the case of the information system for school buildings in Italy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 119-135, March.
    7. Chitralada Chaiya & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad, 2021. "Success or Failure of the Thai Higher Education Development—Critical Factors in the Policy Process of Quality Assurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Mæhle, Per Magnus & Smeland, Sigbjørn, 2021. "Implementing cancer patient pathways in Scandinavia how structuring might affect the acceptance of a politically imposed reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1340-1350.
    9. Nunes, João & Lotta, Gabriela, 2019. "Discretion, power and the reproduction of inequality in health policy implementation: Practices, discursive styles and classifications of Brazil's community health workers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:5:y:2003:i:4:p:471-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.