IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/mimoxx/v34y2004i4p56-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested Industry Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • TIFFANY L. GALVIN
  • MARC J. VENTRESCA
  • BRYANT A. HUDSON

Abstract

Research on legitimacy in studies of organizations, institutions, and industries is marked by a proliferation of terms and categories and often confounds issues of evaluation, contestation, and legality, particularly in addressing industries and legitimacy. We connect an institutional conception of societal logics with standard conceptions of industry belief systems to present a framework and research strategy for examining the multilevel enactment of belief systems and discursive struggles central to the legitimacy dynamics of industries. We illustrate this framework with evidence from the U.S. tobacco and gambling industries to identify and interpret recurring legitimacy struggles. As such, we offer an example of how to better understand legitimacy issues by expanding the levels through which we examine processes of debate and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiffany L. Galvin & Marc J. Ventresca & Bryant A. Hudson, 2004. "Contested Industry Dynamics," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 56-82, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:34:y:2004:i:4:p:56-82
    DOI: 10.1080/00208825.2004.11043718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00208825.2004.11043718
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00208825.2004.11043718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bryant Ashley Hudson & Karen D. W. Patterson & Thomas J. Roulet & Wesley S. Helms & Kimberly Elsbach, 2022. "Organizational Stigma: Taking Stock and Opening New Areas for Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1899-1914, December.
    2. Manning, Stephan & Boons, Frank & von Hagen, Oliver & Reinecke, Juliane, 2012. "National contexts matter: The co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 197-209.
    3. Thomas Roulet, 2015. "“What Good is Wall Street?” Institutional Contradiction and the Diffusion of the Stigma over the Finance Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 389-402, August.
    4. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    5. Roulet, Thomas, 2015. "Qu’il est bon d’être méchant! Paradoxe de l’illégitimité organisationnelle dans le contexte des banques d’investissement [It feels so good to be bad! Paradox of organizational illegitimacy in the c," MPRA Paper 61811, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Salma Zaiane & Dorra Ellouze, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: the moderating effects of size and industry sensitivity," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1147-1187, December.
    7. Novak, Jiri & Bilinski, Pawel, 2018. "Social stigma and executive compensation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 169-184.
    8. Thomas Roulet, 2019. "Les Evaluations Sociales en Stratégie : Légitimité, Réputation, Statut, Stigmate et Cie," Post-Print hal-01970557, HAL.
    9. Alessandro Piazza & Grace L. Augustine, 2022. "Nevertheless, They Persisted: How Patterns of Opposition and Support Shaped the Survival of U.S. Abortion Clinics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 2124-2153, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:mimoxx:v:34:y:2004:i:4:p:56-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/mimo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.