IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v44y2017i6p705-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-agent system with iterative auction mechanism for master bay plan problem in marine logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Calwin S. Parthibaraj
  • PL.K. Palaniappan
  • Angappa Gunasekaran
  • Nachiappan Subramanian

Abstract

The support of containerization to trade development demands an efficient solution method for the container loading problem in order to reduce shipment and handling time. Hence, the stowage planning of containers is critical to provide speedy delivery of resources from the area of supply to the area of demand. Moreover, information on container terminal activities, structure of ship, and characteristics of containers is distributed among stowage planners. This information imposes constraints, and so the master bay plan problem (MBPP) becomes NP-hard. Therefore, a multi-agent systems (MAS) methodology is designed to effectively communicate the information and solve the MBPP sustainably. In the designed MAS methodology, an information exchange system (IES) is created for stowage planners to bid for ship slots in each experimental iterative combinatorial auction (ICA) market. The winner in the ICA experiments is provided with the ship slots, and the entire bay plan is prepared. Further, the ship-turnaround time is validated using the data obtained from the benchmark problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Calwin S. Parthibaraj & PL.K. Palaniappan & Angappa Gunasekaran & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2017. "Multi-agent system with iterative auction mechanism for master bay plan problem in marine logistics," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 705-726, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:705-726
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1324219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2017.1324219
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2017.1324219?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shankar Vinay Arul & Angappa Gunasekaran & SP. Nachiappan & V. Naganathan, 2007. "A design of experiment based procedure for real-time forecasting," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 61-78.
    2. Yavuz Keceli, 2016. "A simulation model for gate operations in multi-purpose cargo terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 945-958, November.
    3. Imai, Akio & Sasaki, Kazuya & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2006. "Multi-objective simultaneous stowage and load planning for a container ship with container rehandle in yard stacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 373-389, June.
    4. Vic Justice & Prashant Bhaskar & Hilary Pateman & Peter Cain & Stephen Cahoon, 2016. "US container port resilience in a complex and dynamic world," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 179-191, February.
    5. Marlow, Peter & Nair, Rawindaran, 2006. "Liner shipping and information exchange--a European perspective," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 681-688, November.
    6. Kuancheng Huang & Suprayogi & Ariantini, 2016. "A continuous berth template design model with multiple wharfs," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 763-775, August.
    7. Steve Yau-Wah Lam & Tsz Leung Yip, 2008. "The role of geomatics engineering in establishing the marine information system for maritime management," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 53-60, February.
    8. Yun, Won Young & Choi, Yong Seok, 1999. "A simulation model for container-terminal operation analysis using an object-oriented approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 221-230, March.
    9. Chin-Shan Lu & Po-Lin Lai & Yi-Pin Chiang, 2016. "Container terminal employees’ perceptions of the effects of sustainable supply chain management on sustainability performance," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 597-613, July.
    10. Woo, Youn Ju & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2011. "Estimating the space requirement for outbound container inventories in port container terminals," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 293-301, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyunwoo Park & Christian C. Blanco & Elliot Bendoly, 2022. "Vessel sharing and its impact on maritime operations and carbon emissions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2925-2942, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cemalettin Öztürk & F. Zeynep Sargut & M. Arslan Örnek & Deniz Türsel Eliiyi, 2017. "Optimisation and heuristic approaches for assigning inbound containers to outbound carriers," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 825-836, October.
    2. Ji, Mingjun & Guo, Wenwen & Zhu, Huiling & Yang, Yongzhi, 2015. "Optimization of loading sequence and rehandling strategy for multi-quay crane operations in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-19.
    3. Na, Ung Jin & Shinozuka, Masanobu, 2009. "Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 722-731.
    4. Yao He & Yongchun Yang & Meimei Wang & Xudong Zhang, 2022. "Resilience Analysis of Container Port Shipping Network Structure: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Michael Görges & Michael Freitag, 2022. "Design and Evaluation of an Integrated Autonomous Control Method for Automobile Terminals," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Monaco, Maria Flavia & Sammarra, Marcello & Sorrentino, Gregorio, 2014. "The Terminal-Oriented Ship Stowage Planning Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 256-265.
    7. Milorad Vidovic & Kap Kim, 2006. "Estimating the cycle time of three-stage material handling systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 181-200, April.
    8. Petri Helo & Henri Paukku & Tero Sairanen, 2021. "Containership cargo profiles, cargo systems, and stowage capacity: key performance indicators," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 28-48, March.
    9. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Hwan-Seong Kim & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Sam-Sang You, 2024. "Seaport profit analysis and efficient management strategies under stochastic disruptions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 212-240, June.
    10. Claudia Durán & Fredi Palominos & Raúl Carrasco & Eduardo Carrillo, 2021. "Influence of Strategic Interrelationships and Decision-Making in Chilean Port Networks on Their Degree of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Gao, Yinping & Zhen, Lu, 2024. "A decision framework for decomposed stowage planning for containers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Raeesi, Ramin & Sahebjamnia, Navid & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2023. "The synergistic effect of operational research and big data analytics in greening container terminal operations: A review and future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(3), pages 943-973.
    13. Fernández, Elena & Munoz-Marquez, Manuel, 2022. "New formulations and solutions for the strategic berth template problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 99-117.
    14. Youn Ju Woo & Jang-Ho Song & Kap Hwan Kim, 2016. "Pricing storage of outbound containers in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 644-668, December.
    15. Orlando Marco Belcore & Massimo Di Gangi & Antonio Polimeni, 2023. "Connected Vehicles and Digital Infrastructures: A Framework for Assessing the Port Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Vis, Iris F.A., 2006. "A comparative analysis of storage and retrieval equipment at a container terminal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 680-693, October.
    17. Wu, Lingxiao & Ma, Weimin, 2017. "Quay crane scheduling with draft and trim constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 38-68.
    18. Hamed Hasheminia & Changmin Jiang, 2017. "Strategic trade-off between vessel delay and schedule recovery: an empirical analysis of container liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 458-473, May.
    19. Harry Geerlings & Robert Heij & Ron van Duin, 2018. "Opportunities for peak shaving the energy demand of ship-to-shore quay cranes at container terminals," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Gu, Bingmei & Liu, Jiaguo & Ye, Xiaoheng & Gong, Yu & Chen, Jihong, 2024. "Data-driven approach for port resilience evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:705-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.