IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v6y2022i4p73-d940780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Evaluation of an Integrated Autonomous Control Method for Automobile Terminals

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Görges

    (Planning and Control of Production and Logistics Systems (PSPS), Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, c/o BIBA, Hochschulring 20, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

  • Michael Freitag

    (Planning and Control of Production and Logistics Systems (PSPS), Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Bremen, c/o BIBA, Hochschulring 20, 28359 Bremen, Germany
    BIBA—Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik, Hochschulring 20, 28359 Bremen, Germany)

Abstract

Background : Automobile terminals play a key role in global finished car supply chains. Due to their connecting character between manufacturers on the one side and distributers on the other side, they are continuously faced with volatile demand fluctuations and unforeseen dynamic events, which cannot be handled adequately by existing planning methods. Autonomous control concepts already showed promising results coping with such dynamics. Methods : This paper describes the causes of dynamics and the terminal systems’ inherent shortcomings in dealing with such dynamics. On this basis, it derives terminal’s demand for novel planning approaches and presents a new integrated autonomous control method for automobile terminals. This novel autonomous control approach combines yard and berth assignments. This paper evaluates the performance of the new approach in a small comprehensive generic scenario. It compares classical planning approaches with the new autonomous control approach, by using a discrete event simulation model. Moreover, it analyses all relevant parameters of the new approach in a full factorial experiment design. In a second step this paper proves the applicability of the combined autonomous control approach to real-world terminals. It presents a simulation model of a real-world terminal and compares the new method with the existing terminal planning approaches. Results : This paper will show that the autonomous control approach is capable of outperforming existing centralized planning methods. In the generic and in the real-world case the new combined method leads to the best logistic target achievement. Conclusions : The new approach is highly suitable to automobile terminal systems and helps to overcome existing shortcomings. Especially in highly dynamic and complex settings, autonomous control performs better than conventional yard planning approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Görges & Michael Freitag, 2022. "Design and Evaluation of an Integrated Autonomous Control Method for Automobile Terminals," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:73-:d:940780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/4/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/6/4/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cordeau, Jean-François & Laporte, Gilbert & Moccia, Luigi & Sorrentino, Gregorio, 2011. "Optimizing yard assignment in an automotive transshipment terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 149-160, November.
    2. Chen, Xiaojing & Li, Feng & Jia, Bin & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Optimizing storage location assignment in an automotive Ro-Ro terminal," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 249-281.
    3. H. Van Dyke Parunak, 1997. ""Go to the ant": Engineering principles from natural multi-agent systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 75(0), pages 69-101, January.
    4. Mattfeld, D. C. & Kopfer, H., 2003. "Terminal operations management in vehicle transshipment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 435-452, June.
    5. Hoff-Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, Marit & Schukraft, Susanne & Werthmann, Dirk & Oelker, Stephan & Freitag, Michael, 2017. "Interactive planning and control for finished vehicle logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digitalization in Maritime and Sustainable Logistics: City Logistics, Port Logistics and Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Digital Age. Proce, volume 24, pages 77-93, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Fischer, T. & Gehring, H., 2005. "Planning vehicle transhipment in a seaport automobile terminal using a multi-agent system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(3), pages 726-740, November.
    7. Armbruster, D. & de Beer, C. & Freitag, M. & Jagalski, T. & Ringhofer, C., 2006. "Autonomous control of production networks using a pheromone approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 363(1), pages 104-114.
    8. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    9. Zhen, Lu & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2011. "A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 54-68, July.
    10. Kuancheng Huang & Suprayogi & Ariantini, 2016. "A continuous berth template design model with multiple wharfs," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 763-775, August.
    11. Xiaohuan Lv & Jian Gang Jin & Hao Hu, 2020. "Berth allocation recovery for container transshipment terminals," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 558-574, June.
    12. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Venkatesh, Mani, 2021. "Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Görges, Michael & Freitag, Michael, 2019. "Modeling autonomously controlled automobile terminal processes," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 186-214, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Di & Chen, Feng & Mei, Ziqiao, 2023. "Optimization on joint scheduling of yard allocation and transfer manpower assignment for automobile RO-RO terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Görges, Michael & Freitag, Michael, 2019. "Modeling autonomously controlled automobile terminal processes," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 186-214, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    4. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2022. "Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 501-524.
    5. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An expanded robust optimisation approach for the berth allocation problem considering uncertain operation time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Chen, Xiaojing & Li, Feng & Jia, Bin & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Liu, Ronghui, 2021. "Optimizing storage location assignment in an automotive Ro-Ro terminal," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 249-281.
    7. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    8. Zhen, Lu & Shen, Tao & Wang, Shuaian & Yu, Shucheng, 2016. "Models on ship scheduling in transshipment hubs with considering bunker cost," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 111-121.
    9. Fernández, Elena & Munoz-Marquez, Manuel, 2022. "New formulations and solutions for the strategic berth template problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 99-117.
    10. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    11. Meixian Jiang & Jiajia Feng & Jian Zhou & Lin Zhou & Fangzheng Ma & Guanghua Wu & Yuqiu Zhang, 2023. "Multi-Terminal Berth and Quay Crane Joint Scheduling in Container Ports Considering Carbon Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Feng, Xuejun & Hu, Sangen & Gu, Weihua & Jin, Xin & Lu, Yuan, 2020. "A simulation-based approach for assessing seaside infrastructure improvement measures for large marine crude oil terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Jia, Shuai & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2020. "A simulation optimization method for deep-sea vessel berth planning and feeder arrival scheduling at a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 174-196.
    14. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    15. Cao, Zhen & Wang, Wenyuan & Jiang, Ying & Xu, Xinglu & Xu, Yunzhuo & Guo, Zijian, 2022. "Joint berth allocation and ship loader scheduling under the rotary loading mode in coal export terminals," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 229-260.
    16. Wang, Kai & Pesch, Erwin & Kress, Dominik & Fridman, Ilia & Boysen, Nils, 2022. "The Piggyback Transportation Problem: Transporting drones launched from a flying warehouse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 504-519.
    17. Xavier Schepler & Nabil Absi & Dominique Feillet & Eric Sanlaville, 2019. "The stochastic discrete berth allocation problem," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(4), pages 363-396, December.
    18. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    19. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2021. "An exact robust approach for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problem under uncertain arrival times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 499-516.
    20. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:6:y:2022:i:4:p:73-:d:940780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.