IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v40y2013i2p116-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Counterbalancing peripherality and concentration: an analysis of the UK container port system

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Wilmsmeier
  • Jason Monios

Abstract

Over the last four decades, the UK container port system experienced a shift to and concentration in the southeast of the country, close to the English Channel. At the same time, traditional ports in the north and centre of the country have lost importance, despite overall container traffic growth. This paper analyses the evolution of container traffic at UK ports, mapping the patterns of container trade relations, focusing on regional trade specialisations as well as transshipment patterns. The paper identifies a potential deconcentration of container traffic within the UK port system, related to a shift in gateway region for UK trade, increasingly being transshipped through continental ports rather than the traditional southeastern UK ports, as well as a shift in role at UK ports from gateways to transshipment hubs. This deconcentration has potential benefit for regional UK ports, many of which are pursuing significant port expansions to take advantage of these trends. These ports seek to reposition themselves within an emerging feeder market that could reduce their peripherality embedded by the current concentrated UK port and infrastructure system. The paper thus raises questions about port policy and both public and private sector responses to a changing UK port geography.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Wilmsmeier & Jason Monios, 2013. "Counterbalancing peripherality and concentration: an analysis of the UK container port system," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 116-132, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:40:y:2013:i:2:p:116-132
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.756588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2012.756588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2012.756588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2014. "The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 583-606, September.
    2. Zhang, Qiang & Yan, Kai & Yang, Dong, 2021. "Port system evolution in Chinese coastal regions: A provincial perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Dean, M., 2021. "Participatory multi-criteria analysis methods: Comprehensive, inclusive, transparent and user-friendly? An application to the case of the London Gateway Port," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Pérez-Salas, Gabriel, 2014. "Port system evolution – the case of Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 208-221.
    5. Bahana Wiradanti & Stephen Pettit & Andrew Potter & Wessam Abouarghoub, 2020. "Willingness to invest in peripheral ports: perceptions of Indonesian port and maritime industry stakeholders," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 699-714, December.
    6. Dariusz Bernacki & Christian Lis, 2021. "Forecasting the Cargo Throughput for Small and Medium-sized Ports: Multi-stage Approach with Reference to the Multi-port System," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 208-228.
    7. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2016. "Institutional structure and agency in the governance of spatial diversification of port system evolution in Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 294-307.
    8. Dariusz Bernacki & Christian Lis, 2021. "Investigating the Sustainable Impact of Seaport Infrastructure Provision on Maritime Component of Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Yang, Dong & Wang, Kelly Yujie & Xu, Hua & Zhang, Zhehui, 2017. "Path to a multilayered transshipment port system: How the Yangtze River bulk port system has evolved," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-64.
    10. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    11. Tovar, Beatriz & Hernández, Rubén & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor, 2015. "Container port competitiveness and connectivity: The Canary Islands main ports case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 40-51.
    12. Oliveira, Gabriel Figueiredo de & Schaffar, Alexandra & Cariou, Pierre & Monios, Jason, 2021. "Convergence and growth traps in container ports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 170-180.
    13. Monios, Jason, 2017. "Cascading feeder vessels and the rationalisation of small container ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 88-99.
    14. Yiran Sun & Yuqian Wang & Jingci Xie, 2022. "The co-evolution of seaports and dry ports in Shandong province in China under the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason, 2015. "The production of capitalist “smooth” space in global port operations," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 59-69.
    16. de Oliveira, Gabriel Figueiredo & Cariou, Pierre & Monios, Jason, 2023. "Mobility in European container port rankings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:40:y:2013:i:2:p:116-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.