IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v16y2013i5p523-539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Runway safety program evaluation with uncertainties of benefits and costs

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen C. Rogerson
  • James H. Lambert
  • Alexander F. Johns

Abstract

Risk and safety programs need to be monitored and evaluated through real-world experience and performance. Several perspectives on the program might be useful across organizational units, stakeholders, and subject-matter experts. Quantifications of risks, benefits, and costs of the programs as well as the associated parameter uncertainties will vary by perspective. The literature has quantified the benefits of a safety program in single stakeholder/expert perspectives. This paper describes a layering of perspectives of program effectiveness and characterizes the variation of estimated program efficacy across the several perspectives. Within each perspective, the uncertainties of model selection and the estimation of cost-benefit analysis parameters are addressed via interval numbers. The approach is demonstrated for safety trainings that are aimed to reduce runway incursions for 80 airports across a region, an issue of highest priority for the US National Transportation Safety Board. The several perspectives of the demonstration are the pilot/driver, the airport owner/operator, and the safety regulator. The results suggest for each of the perspectives which of the airports should receive the trainings. The paper will be of interest for the performance evaluation of safety programs with uncertainties of program benefits and costs and multiple agencies, users, customers, and other stakeholders/experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen C. Rogerson & James H. Lambert & Alexander F. Johns, 2013. "Runway safety program evaluation with uncertainties of benefits and costs," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 523-539, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:5:p:523-539
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2012.725674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2012.725674
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2012.725674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rogerson, Ellen C. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Prioritizing risks via several expert perspectives with application to runway safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 22-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junrui Xu & James H. Lambert, 2015. "Risk‐Cost‐Benefit Analysis for Transportation Corridors with Interval Uncertainties of Heterogeneous Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 624-641, April.
    2. Thorisson, Heimir & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Multiscale identification of emergent and future conditions along corridors of transportation networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 255-263.
    3. Junrui Xu & James H. Lambert, 2013. "Distributed travel time savings of a multiscale transportation access management program," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 362-375, September.
    4. Sai Ho Chung & Hoi Lam Ma & Hing Kai Chan, 2017. "Cascading Delay Risk of Airline Workforce Deployments with Crew Pairing and Schedule Optimization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
    5. Shital A. Thekdi & Joost R. Santos, 2016. "Supply Chain Vulnerability Analysis Using Scenario‐Based Input‐Output Modeling: Application to Port Operations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 1025-1039, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Tai-Ran & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Identification of protective actions to reduce the vulnerability of safety-critical systems to malevolent acts: A sensitivity-based decision-making approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 9-18.
    2. T. R. Wang & N. Pedroni & E. Zio & V. Mousseau, 2020. "Identification of Protective Actions to Reduce the Vulnerability of Safety‐Critical Systems to Malevolent Intentional Acts: An Optimization‐Based Decision‐Making Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 565-587, March.
    3. Dustin C.S. Wagner & Kash Barker, 2014. "Statistical methods for modeling the risk of runway excursions," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 885-901, August.
    4. Almutairi, Ayedh & Collier, Zachary A. & Hendrickson, Daniel & Palma-Oliveira, José M. & Polmateer, Thomas L. & Lambert, James H., 2019. "Stakeholder mapping and disruption scenarios with application to resilience of a container port," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 219-232.
    5. Skorupski, Jacek, 2015. "The risk of an air accident as a result of a serious incident of the hybrid type," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 37-52.
    6. Sai Ho Chung & Hoi Lam Ma & Hing Kai Chan, 2017. "Cascading Delay Risk of Airline Workforce Deployments with Crew Pairing and Schedule Optimization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1443-1458, August.
    7. Trucco, Paolo & De Ambroggi, Massimiliano & Chiara Leva, Maria, 2015. "Topological risk mapping of runway overruns: A probabilistic approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 433-443.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:16:y:2013:i:5:p:523-539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.