IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jnlasa/v109y2014i505p216-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Eun Ryung Lee
  • Hohsuk Noh
  • Byeong U. Park

Abstract

Bayesian information criterion (BIC) is known to identify the true model consistently as long as the predictor dimension is finite. Recently, its moderate modifications have been shown to be consistent in model selection even when the number of variables diverges. Those works have been done mostly in mean regression, but rarely in quantile regression. The best-known results about BIC for quantile regression are for linear models with a fixed number of variables. In this article, we investigate how BIC can be adapted to high-dimensional linear quantile regression and show that a modified BIC is consistent in model selection when the number of variables diverges as the sample size increases. We also discuss how it can be used for choosing the regularization parameters of penalized approaches that are designed to conduct variable selection and shrinkage estimation simultaneously. Moreover, we extend the results to structured nonparametric quantile models with a diverging number of covariates. We illustrate our theoretical results via some simulated examples and a real data analysis on human eye disease. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun Ryung Lee & Hohsuk Noh & Byeong U. Park, 2014. "Model Selection via Bayesian Information Criterion for Quantile Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 216-229, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:109:y:2014:i:505:p:216-229
    DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.836975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01621459.2013.836975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01621459.2013.836975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horowitz, Joel L. & Lee, Sokbae, 2005. "Nonparametric Estimation of an Additive Quantile Regression Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1238-1249, December.
    2. Jiahua Chen & Zehua Chen, 2008. "Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 759-771.
    3. Zhang, Yiyun & Li, Runze & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2010. "Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(489), pages 312-323.
    4. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731.
    5. Mazumder, Rahul & Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor, 2011. "SparseNet: Coordinate Descent With Nonconvex Penalties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(495), pages 1125-1138.
    6. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    7. Noh, Hohsuk & Chung, Kwanghun & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Variable selection of varying coefficient models in quantile regression," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2012008, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. Hansheng Wang & Bo Li & Chenlei Leng, 2009. "Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(3), pages 671-683, June.
    9. Machado, José A.F., 1993. "Robust Model Selection and M-Estimation," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 478-493, June.
    10. Wang, Hansheng & Xia, Yingcun, 2009. "Shrinkage Estimation of the Varying Coefficient Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 747-757.
    11. Wang, Hansheng & Li, Guodong & Jiang, Guohua, 2007. "Robust Regression Shrinkage and Consistent Variable Selection Through the LAD-Lasso," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 25, pages 347-355, July.
    12. Noh, Hohsuk & Chung, Kwanghun & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2012. "Variable Selection of Varying Coefficient Models in Quantile Regression," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012020, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    13. Hansheng Wang & Runze Li & Chih-Ling Tsai, 2007. "Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(3), pages 553-568.
    14. Lan Wang & Yichao Wu & Runze Li, 2012. "Quantile Regression for Analyzing Heterogeneity in Ultra-High Dimension," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 214-222, March.
    15. Jianhua Z. Huang & Lijian Yang, 2004. "Identification of non‐linear additive autoregressive models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 463-477, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Chaohui Guo & Hu Yang & Jing Lv, 2017. "Robust variable selection in high-dimensional varying coefficient models based on weighted composite quantile regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1009-1033, December.
    3. Fan, Rui & Lee, Ji Hyung & Shin, Youngki, 2023. "Predictive quantile regression with mixed roots and increasing dimensions: The ALQR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    4. Gaorong Li & Liugen Xue & Heng Lian, 2012. "SCAD-penalised generalised additive models with non-polynomial dimensionality," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 681-697.
    5. Yuta Umezu & Yusuke Shimizu & Hiroki Masuda & Yoshiyuki Ninomiya, 2019. "AIC for the non-concave penalized likelihood method," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 247-274, April.
    6. Lian, Heng & Li, Jianbo & Tang, Xingyu, 2014. "SCAD-penalized regression in additive partially linear proportional hazards models with an ultra-high-dimensional linear part," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 50-64.
    7. Lian, Heng, 2014. "Semiparametric Bayesian information criterion for model selection in ultra-high dimensional additive models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 304-310.
    8. Hu, Yuao & Lian, Heng, 2013. "Variable selection in a partially linear proportional hazards model with a diverging dimensionality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 61-69.
    9. Lian, Heng, 2012. "A note on the consistency of Schwarz’s criterion in linear quantile regression with the SCAD penalty," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(7), pages 1224-1228.
    10. Tang, Yanlin & Wang, Huixia Judy & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2013. "Variable selection in quantile varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 435-449.
    11. Yingying Fan & Cheng Yong Tang, 2013. "Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(3), pages 531-552, June.
    12. Yunxiao Chen & Xiaoou Li & Jingchen Liu & Zhiliang Ying, 2017. "Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 660-692, September.
    13. Zhang, Ting & Wang, Lei, 2020. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Fei Jin & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "Lasso Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Parametric Models with Singular Information Matrices," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Guang Cheng & Hao Zhang & Zuofeng Shang, 2015. "Sparse and efficient estimation for partial spline models with increasing dimension," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(1), pages 93-127, February.
    16. Fang Lu & Jing Yang & Xuewen Lu, 2022. "One-step oracle procedure for semi-parametric spatial autoregressive model and its empirical application to Boston housing price data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2645-2671, June.
    17. Sakyajit Bhattacharya & Paul McNicholas, 2014. "A LASSO-penalized BIC for mixture model selection," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 45-61, March.
    18. Jin, Fei & Lee, Lung-fei, 2018. "Irregular N2SLS and LASSO estimation of the matrix exponential spatial specification model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 336-358.
    19. Ping Zeng & Yongyue Wei & Yang Zhao & Jin Liu & Liya Liu & Ruyang Zhang & Jianwei Gou & Shuiping Huang & Feng Chen, 2014. "Variable selection approach for zero-inflated count data via adaptive lasso," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 879-894, April.
    20. Weihua Zhao & Weiping Zhang & Heng Lian, 2020. "Marginal quantile regression for varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 213-234, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jnlasa:v:109:y:2014:i:505:p:216-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UASA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.