IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v25y2015i1p45-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing antecedents and consequences of student satisfaction in higher education: evidence from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • M.M. Lai
  • S.H. Lau
  • N.A. Mohamad Yusof
  • K.W. Chew

Abstract

This paper explores the interrelationships of the key influences on student satisfaction via multivariate analysis from three groups of university students in two popular private universities in Malaysia. The correlation coefficient and structural model indicated that student satisfaction is influenced not only by academic quality, but also by the university core services, information technology services, and skill building. These dimensions are linked to one another. The strong interrelationships between these dimensions are indicative that holistic approach needs to be adopted rather than dealing with each dimension in isolation in creating a valued education. Significant performance gaps of key influences indicated that the satisfaction levels are below students' expectation despite the satisfaction scores being above average. Academic assessment, teaching quality, and IT are areas where a university management needs to prioritize resources in order to increase student satisfaction. Students who perceived higher value are more likely to have higher repurchase intention.

Suggested Citation

  • M.M. Lai & S.H. Lau & N.A. Mohamad Yusof & K.W. Chew, 2015. "Assessing antecedents and consequences of student satisfaction in higher education: evidence from Malaysia," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 45-69, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:25:y:2015:i:1:p:45-69
    DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2015.1042097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08841241.2015.1042097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08841241.2015.1042097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Florian U. Siems, 2012. "Values education and student satisfaction: German business students' perceptions of universities' value influences," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 257-272, December.
    2. Mian, Sarfraz A., 1996. "Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 325-335, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Padlee, Siti Falindah & Reimers, Vaughan & Mokhlis, Safiek & Anuar, Marhana Mohamed & Ahmad, Azlinzuraini, 2020. "Keep up the good work in research universities: An importance-performance analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 128-138.
    2. Fernando de Oliveira Santini & Wagner Junior Ladeira & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Gustavo da Silva Costa, 2017. "Student satisfaction in higher education: a meta-analytic study," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Zohair Al-Zoubi & Ahmad Qablan & Hytham Bany Issa & Omar Bataineh & Ahmed Mohammed Al Kaabi, 2023. "The Degree of Implementation of Total Quality Management in Universities and Its Relationship to the Level of Community Service from the Perspectives of Faculty Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. James A. Cunningham & Paul O’Reilly, 2018. "Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 545-557, June.
    3. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    4. Lindelöf, Peter & Löfsten, Hans, 2002. "Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms--assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off Science Parks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 143-154, June.
    5. repec:tiu:tiutis:59edbbb2-7e12-4c54-a431-d37c6df29694 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Elsie Harper-Anderson & David A. Lewis, 2018. "What Makes Business Incubation Work? Measuring the Influence of Incubator Quality and Regional Capacity on Incubator Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(1), pages 60-77, February.
    7. Nasser Al‐Baimani & Nick Clifton & Eleri Jones & Rhiannon Pugh, 2021. "Applying the ecosystem model in a new context? The case of business incubation in Oman," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 663-686, June.
    8. Díez-Vial, Isabel & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2016. "How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 41-52.
    9. Richard A. Hunt, 2017. "The Oxpecker and the Rhino: The Positive Effects of Symbiotic Mutualism on Organizational Survival," Working Papers 2017-03, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    10. Albort-Morant, Gema & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2016. "How useful are incubators for new entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2125-2129.
    11. Xiangfei Yuan & Haijing Hao & Chenghua Guan & Alex Pentland, 2021. "What are the key components of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a developing economy? A longitudinal empirical study on technology business incubators in China," Papers 2103.08131, arXiv.org.
    12. Niels Stijn & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Martine Veelen, 2018. "Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: evidence from Route 128," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 674-713, June.
    13. Riccardo Fini & Rosa Grimaldi & Maurizio Sobrero, 2009. "Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 380-402, August.
    14. I.Semih Akçomak & Erol Taymaz, 2004. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Incubators: The Case of Turkey," ERC Working Papers 0412, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Oct 2004.
    15. Mariana Nicolae-Balan & Raluca Ioana Iorgulescu, 2013. "Dimensions And Peculiarities Of Romanian Youth Labour Force In The Context Of Sustainable Development," Working papers 18, Ecological University of Bucharest, Department of Economics.
    16. Catarina Roseira & Carla Ramos & Francisco Maia, 2014. "Understanding Incubator Value – A Network Approach to University Incubators," FEP Working Papers 532, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    17. Serge Francis Simen & Gérol Sylvère Nganafei, 2018. "Comment influencer positivement le succès des incubateurs universitaires de start-up technologiques ?," Post-Print halshs-01785627, HAL.
    18. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    19. Elisa Salvador, 2012. "Italian Science Parks And Incubators: Some Considerations Arising From A Questionnaire Investigation On Research Spin-Off Firms," Post-Print hal-02093934, HAL.
    20. Soetanto, Danny & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2019. "Life after incubation: The impact of entrepreneurial universities on the long-term performance of their spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 263-276.
    21. Dina Cunha & Sandra T. Silva & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2013. "Are Academic Spin-Offs necessarily New Technology-Based firms?," FEP Working Papers 482, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:25:y:2015:i:1:p:45-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.