IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v43y2012i3p300-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Should We Be Teaching in Basic Economics Courses?

Author

Listed:
  • James Gwartney

Abstract

Advanced Placement economics leaves thousands of high school students with a misleading impression of modern economics. The courses fail to cover key sources of growth and prosperity, including private ownership, dynamic competition, and entrepreneurship. The tools of public choice economics are totally ignored. Government is modeled as a corrective device available to impose ideal solutions. Market failure is covered, but there is no such thing as government failure. The macroeconomics course reflects the simplistic 1960s Keynesian view of stabilization policy. Time lags, incentive effects, secondary effects of budget deficits, and other factors that complicate effective use of stabilization policy are almost entirely ignored. In contrast, the 20 Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics of the Council for Economic Education illustrate what a balanced course in modern economics would look like.

Suggested Citation

  • James Gwartney, 2012. "What Should We Be Teaching in Basic Economics Courses?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 300-307, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:43:y:2012:i:3:p:300-307
    DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2012.686398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2012.686398
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220485.2012.686398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2021. "Schumpeter in Vienna: A Study Abroad Course," Contributions to Economics, in: Joshua Hall & Kim Holder (ed.), Off-Campus Study, Study Abroad, and Study Away in Economics, chapter 0, pages 175-190, Springer.
    2. Dalton, John & Logan, Andrew, 2019. "A Vision for a Dynamic World: Reading Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy for Today," MPRA Paper 95012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2020. "Using the movie Joy to teach innovation and entrepreneurship," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 287-296, August.
    4. James Gwartney & Jane S. Shaw, 2013. "What Should Be Taught and Learned in Economics Classes (and Is It?)," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 29(Fall 2013), pages 73-86.
    5. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    6. Dalton, John T. & Logan, Andrew J., 2022. "The Man Who Discovered Capitalism: A documentary on Schumpeter for use in the classroom," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    7. Marie Briguglio & Charity-Joy Acchiardo & Dirk Mateer & Wayne Geerling, 2020. "Behavioral economics in film: Insights for educators," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(1), pages 17-28, December.
    8. Michael Makovi, 2015. "George Orwell as a Public Choice Economist," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(2), pages 183-208, September.
    9. repec:zbw:inwedp:552014 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. John T. Dalton & Andrew J. Logan, 2022. "Teaching and learning Schumpeter: A dialogue between professor and student," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 235-256, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:43:y:2012:i:3:p:300-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.