IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v27y1999i1p1-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy and trade conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Sherman

Abstract

The record of formal disputes in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is largely one of conflict among democracies. I develop a theoretical argument to explain the prevalence of democratic states in the GATT's dispute process. Democracies face stronger pressures to initiate disputes; they are more attractive as dispute targets due to the political influence enjoyed by interest groups; they share norms of juridical dispute resolution; and they are more likely to uphold their policy commitments than nondemocracies. I develop an empirical model of the incidence of disputes among GATT members, finding that democracies are more likely to participate in disputes than nondemocratic states. I also find that democratic dyads are more likely to resolve their disputes cooperatively.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Sherman, 1999. "Democracy and trade conflict," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-28, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:27:y:1999:i:1:p:1-28
    DOI: 10.1080/03050620108434975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050620108434975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050620108434975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly Ann Elliott & Thomas O. Bayard, 1994. "Reciprocity and Retaliation in U.S. Trade Policy," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc L. Busch, 2000. "Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 44(4), pages 425-446, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nuno Limão & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2018. "Trade Preferences to Small Developing Countries and the Welfare Costs of Lost Multilateral Liberalization," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Policy Externalities and International Trade Agreements, chapter 15, pages 403-426, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Kishore Gawande, 1997. "A Test of a Theory of Strategically Retaliatory Trade Barriers," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 425-449, October.
    3. Suma Athreye & Lucia Piscitello & Kenneth C. Shadlen, 2020. "Twenty-five years since TRIPS: Patent policy and international business," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 315-328, December.
    4. Maxim Engers & Jonathan Eaton, 1999. "Sanctions: Some Simple Analytics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 409-414, May.
    5. Shujiro Urata, 2020. "US–Japan Trade Frictions: The Past, the Present, and Implications for the US–China Trade War," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 15(1), pages 141-159, January.
    6. Daniela Benavente, 2010. "Constraining and supporting effects of the multilateral trading system on U.S. unilateralism," IHEID Working Papers 09-2010, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    7. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1997. "Dumping on Free Trade: The U.S. Import Trade Laws," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 402-424, October.
    8. Kenneth Kasa, 1995. "Gaiatsu," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue sep15.
    9. Bruce A. Blonigen & Robert C. Feenstra, 1997. "Protectionist Threats and Foreign Direct Investment," NBER Chapters, in: The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, pages 55-80, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. John C. Beghin & Heidi Schweizer, 2021. "Agricultural Trade Costs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 500-530, June.
    11. Maskus, Keith E. & Penubarti, Mohan, 1995. "How trade-related are intellectual property rights?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 227-248, November.
    12. Alvaro Cuervo-Cazurra, 2018. "Thanks but no thanks: State-owned multinationals from emerging markets and host-country policies," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 128-156, December.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6629 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Byron Gangnes & Craig Parsons, 2007. "Have US–Japan Trade Agreements Made a Difference?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 548-566.
    15. William Roberts Clark & Erick Duchesne & William L. Reed, 2006. "Strategic Interaction and Trade Policymaking: Formal Analysis and Simulation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 507-520, April.
    16. Daniel W. Drezner, 2000. "Outside the box: Explaining sanctions in pursuit of foreign economic goals," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 379-410, April.
    17. Guanyi Leu, 2011. "ASEAN’s Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA) Strategy," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 30(2), pages 31-64.
    18. Richard Sherman & Johan Eliasson, 2006. "Trade Disputes and Non‐state Actors: New Institutional Arrangements and the Privatisation of Commercial Diplomacy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 473-489, April.
    19. Chad P. Bown & Thomas J. Prusa, 2021. "U.S. Anti-dumping: Much Ado about Zeroing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Thomas J Prusa (ed.), Economic Effects of Antidumping, chapter 10, pages 195-232, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    20. Eric Reinhardt, 2001. "Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(2), pages 174-195, April.
    21. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2001. "TRADE POLICY IN TRANSITION? political economy of antidumping in Japan," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 22-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:27:y:1999:i:1:p:1-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.