IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i7p1147-1165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How relationships can influence an organic firm’s network identity

Author

Listed:
  • Gunn-Turid Kvam
  • Hilde Bjørkhaug
  • Ann-Charlott Pedersen

Abstract

A main challenge when organic food actors cooperate with conventional food actors is to maintain their identity in the relationship. In this paper, we analyse such a relationship through the use of the industrial marketing and purchasing perspective (IMP). The aim is to increase knowledge about changes in relationships that occur through growth processes and about how new relationships influence the identity of a quality-oriented firm. We use a case-study method when examining the relationship between the organic Røros Dairy and the retail chain Coop, and its effects on relationships within the dairy network. Results show that the focal relationship influences, and in turn is influenced by, the dairy’s network. Because of the dairy’s strong identity that preceded its formal cooperation with Coop, as well as its reputation for quality production and continuous product development, the dairy has strengthened its position in the network. We conclude that the IMP perspective contributes a valuable framework in this study of an organic food network. For business managers, our results highlight the importance of considering possible effects of relationships on the identity one would want to convey.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunn-Turid Kvam & Hilde Bjørkhaug & Ann-Charlott Pedersen, 2017. "How relationships can influence an organic firm’s network identity," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1147-1165, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:7:p:1147-1165
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1270909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2016.1270909
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2016.1270909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilkinson, Ian & Young, Louise, 2002. "On cooperating: firms, relations and networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 123-132, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    2. Olena Gudz & Nataliya Prokopenko, 2018. "The Increase Of Enterprises' Innovative Development Based On The Network Approach," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    3. Chou, Hsin-Hui & Zolkiewski, Judy, 2012. "Managing resource interaction as a means to cope with technological change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 188-195.
    4. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Ji, Ping & Feng, Lei, 2010. "The evolutionary complexity of complex adaptive supply networks: A simulation and case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 310-330, April.
    5. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak, 2017. "Koncepcja sieci w badaniach zrównoważonego rozwoju agrobiznesu," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 119-145.
    6. Erkan Erdil & Dilek Cetin, 2008. "Innovation and Relationships in an Organized Indutrial District: Ankara Sincan Industrial District," STPS Working Papers 0802, STPS - Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Aug 2008.
    7. Filipe J. Sousa & Luís M. de Castro, 2005. "Relationship significance: is it sufficiently explained?," FEP Working Papers 183, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    8. Rosana Zau Mafra & Dimas José Lasmar & Dalton Chaves Vilela Júnior, 2019. "Interorganizational Relationships in the Amazon Biotech Industry Based on Entrepreneurs´ Perceptions," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 23(5), pages 672-695.
    9. Anselm Schneider & Christopher Wickert & Emilio Marti, 2017. "Reducing Complexity by Creating Complexity: A Systems Theory Perspective on How Organizations Respond to Their Environments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 182-208, March.
    10. Weltin, M. & Zasada, I., 2018. "Adopting and Combining Strategies of Sustainable Intensification An Analysis of Interdependencies in Farmers Decision Making," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276982, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Cerqueti, Roy & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Grassi, Rosanna, 2021. "Stratified cohesiveness in complex business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 515-526.
    12. Nell, Phillip C. & Andersson, Ulf, 2012. "The complexity of the business network context and its effect on subsidiary relational (over-) embeddedness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1087-1098.
    13. Felix Kipkosgei & Seung-Wan Kang & Suk Bong Choi, 2020. "A Team-Level Study of the Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Trust in Kenya: Moderating Role of Collaborative Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Daniel Ladley & Ian Wilkinson & Louise Young, 2013. "The Evolution Of Cooperation In Business: Individual Vs. Group Incentives," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/14, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    15. Valkokari, Katri, 2015. "Describing network dynamics in three different business nets," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 219-231.
    16. Jagpal, Sharan & Spiegel, Menahem, 2011. "Free samples, profits, and welfare: The effect of market structures and behavioral modes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 213-219, February.
    17. Ding, Yibing & Li, Jing & Song, Yang & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2024. "How does the cross-border M&A network affect digital innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    18. Roman Šperka, 2015. "Simulation Methods Comparison in Business Process Domain," Working Papers 0019, Silesian University, School of Business Administration.
    19. Maria TĂTĂRUȘANU, 2016. "The Networks In Tourism: A Theoretical Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 8, pages 197-203, December.
    20. Karl Finger & Daniel Fricke & Thomas Lux, 2013. "Network analysis of the e-MID overnight money market: the informational value of different aggregation levels for intrinsic dynamic processes," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 187-211, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:7:p:1147-1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.