IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Increase Of Enterprises' Innovative Development Based On The Network Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Olena Gudz

    (Department of Management, State University of Telecommunications, Ukraine)

  • Nataliya Prokopenko

    (Department of Finance, Accounting and Taxation, PHEE "European University", Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is studying the role and problems of the innovative development of domestic enterprises, discovering the factors that influence these processes. Methodology. The methodology for the study was based on logical and historical methods, methods of the system-functional approach, methods of scientific abstraction, systematization, grouping, generalization and formalization, analysis and synthesis, economic and statistical methods, and method of questioning and peer review. Results. It is studied the essence and substantiated the expediency of the network approach use, it is outlined its capabilities and limitations, determined the effectiveness of network innovation structures, and developed the proposals for activating the innovative development of enterprises in new dimensions of the economic space based on the network approach. Practical implications. The proposed measures will promote the activation of innovative development for domestic enterprises, improve the quality of business chains, competitiveness and management structures, and provide the development of new market segments. Value/originality. The information background for the paper was the official data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, statistical and financial statements of enterprises, rating estimates by the international agency Bloomberg Rankings, analytical report "Global Innovation Index" (World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO), the report of the European Innovation Scoreboard, scientific publications of domestic and foreign researchers, normative reference literature, analytical and logical generalizations and observations of authors, Internet information resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Olena Gudz & Nataliya Prokopenko, 2018. "The Increase Of Enterprises' Innovative Development Based On The Network Approach," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:13
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-99-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/337
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-99-105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilkinson, Ian & Young, Louise, 2002. "On cooperating: firms, relations and networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 123-132, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    2. Simba, Amon & Wang, Yan & del Olmo García, Francisco, 2023. "Deconstructing self-organisation in microentrepreneurship: A social embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Chou, Hsin-Hui & Zolkiewski, Judy, 2012. "Managing resource interaction as a means to cope with technological change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 188-195.
    4. Manser, Kristina & Hillebrand, Bas & Driessen, Paul H. & Ziggers, Gerrit Willem & Bloemer, Josée M.M., 2015. "Activity sets in multi-organizational ecologies: a project-level perspective on sustainable energy innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 444-455.
    5. Ballantyne, David & Williams, John, 2008. "Business to business relationships: the paradox of network constraints?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 95-107.
    6. Roger Schweizer, 2013. "SMEs and networks: Overcoming the liability of outsidership," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 80-103, March.
    7. Fredin, Sabrina, 2012. "The Dynamics and Evolution of Local Industries – The case of Linköping," Papers in Innovation Studies 2012/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    8. Sascha Kraus & Fabian Meier & Thomas Niemand & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Paavo Ritala, 2018. "In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1025-1053, October.
    9. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Ji, Ping & Feng, Lei, 2010. "The evolutionary complexity of complex adaptive supply networks: A simulation and case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 310-330, April.
    10. Erik Hofmann & Yannick Sertori, 2020. "Financial Spillover Effects in Supply Chains: Do Customers and Suppliers Really Benefit?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, March.
    11. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak, 2017. "Koncepcja sieci w badaniach zrównoważonego rozwoju agrobiznesu," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 119-145.
    12. Thierry Isckia & Denis Lescop, 2008. "Open innovation within business ecosystems : lessons from Amazon.com," Post-Print hal-02507841, HAL.
    13. Gunn-Turid Kvam & Hilde Bjørkhaug & Ann-Charlott Pedersen, 2017. "How relationships can influence an organic firm’s network identity," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1147-1165, July.
    14. Paulina Nowak, 2021. "Cooperation of enterprises in innovative activities on the example of Polish regions," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(4), pages 839-857, December.
    15. Erkan Erdil & Dilek Cetin, 2008. "Innovation and Relationships in an Organized Indutrial District: Ankara Sincan Industrial District," STPS Working Papers 0802, STPS - Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Aug 2008.
    16. Arcagni, Alberto & Grassi, Rosanna & Stefani, Silvana & Torriero, Anna, 2021. "Extending assortativity: An application to weighted social networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 774-783.
    17. Monaghan, Sinéad & Lavelle, Jonathan & Gunnigle, Patrick, 2017. "Mapping networks: Exploring the utility of social network analysis in management research and practice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 136-144.
    18. Karl Finger & Daniel Fricke & Thomas Lux, 2013. "Network analysis of the e-MID overnight money market: the informational value of different aggregation levels for intrinsic dynamic processes," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 187-211, June.
    19. Mattos, Enlinson & Bressan, Rafael, 2022. "Nontariff barriers, trading companies and customs duties evasion," Textos para discussão 560, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    20. Filipe J. Sousa & Luís M. de Castro, 2005. "Relationship significance: is it sufficiently explained?," FEP Working Papers 183, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovations; innovative development; enterprises; network approach; network innovative structures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • P2 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.