IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v27y2015i2p133-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Environmental Responsibility Of Cities And Emissions Embodied In Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Taelim Choi

Abstract

The attribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions embedded in interregionally traded products to either production or consumption regions is a key issue to the understanding of the global environmental responsibility of metropolitan areas. In this paper we identify GHG emissions for which metropolitan areas assume responsibility by allocating emissions embodied in import and export products to regions of either consumption or production in the cases of three US metropolitan areas. The case studies show that embodied emissions in both export and import products accounted for 63-73% of total GHG emissions directly and indirectly pertaining to these metropolitan economies. These findings suggest that an accounting method that incorporates emissions embodied in product trade has relevance to the development of local policies that govern actions ranging from redirecting metropolitan development patterns toward low carbon emissions to promoting sustainable consumption behavior, particularly those involving the collaboration of cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Taelim Choi, 2015. "Understanding Environmental Responsibility Of Cities And Emissions Embodied In Trade," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:27:y:2015:i:2:p:133-153
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2015.1012638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2015.1012638
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2015.1012638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Norihiko Yamano & Nadim Ahmad, 2006. "The OECD Input-Output Database: 2006 Edition," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2006/8, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhong, Zhangqi & Guo, Zhifang & Zhang, Jianwu, 2021. "Does the participation in global value chains promote interregional carbon emissions transferring via trade? Evidence from 39 major economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Pedro N. Ramos & João Pedro Ferreira & Luís Cruz & Eduardo Barata, 2020. "Os modelos Input-Output, a estrutura setorial das economias e o impacto da crise da COVID 19," GEE Papers 0150, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised May 2020.
    3. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten S. Wiebe & Martin Bruckner & Stefan Giljum & Christian Lutz, 2012. "Calculating Energy-Related Co 2 Emissions Embodied In International Trade Using A Global Input--Output Model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 113-139, November.
    2. L. Ngai & Roberto Samaniego, 2009. "Mapping prices into productivity in multisector growth models," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 183-204, September.
    3. Dario Guarascio & Mario Pianta & Francesco Bogliacino, 2017. "Export, R&D and New Products: A Model and a Test on European Industries," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 393-432, Springer.
    4. Cristiano Cantore & Miguel León-Ledesma & Peter McAdam & Alpo Willman, 2014. "Shocking Stuff: Technology, Hours, And Factor Substitution," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 108-128, February.
    5. Camacho, José A. & Rodríguez, M., 2005. "Los esfuerzos tecnológicos en el sistema productivo español: evaluación y comparación con otros países europeos/Technological efforts in the Spanish production system. Aassessment and comparison with ," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 23, pages 621-636, Diciembre.
    6. Sadao, Nishimura, 2010. "Towards Analysis of Vertical Structure of Industries: a method and its application to U.S. industries," MPRA Paper 27464, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Charles I. Jones, 2011. "Intermediate Goods and Weak Links in the Theory of Economic Development," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Fernando Rio & Antonio Sampayo, 2017. "Complementarity, Linkages between Firms, and the Effect of Entry Costs on Productivity," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 1281-1304, November.
    9. Grobovšek Jan, 2018. "Development accounting with intermediate goods," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Escaith, Hubert, 2008. "Measuring trade in value added in the new industrial economy: statistical implications," MPRA Paper 14454, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Thomas Strobel, 2012. "ICT Intermediates, Growth and Productivity Spillovers Evidence from Comparison of Growth Effects in German and US Manufacturing Sectors," ifo Working Paper Series 123, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (Ed.), 2012. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse. Tagungsband: Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2010," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    13. Jan Grobovsek, 2013. "Development Accounting with Intermediate Goods," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 223, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    14. Epifani, Paolo & Gancia, Gino, 2017. "Global imbalances revisited: The transfer problem and transport costs in monopolistic competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 99-116.
    15. Dias, Guilherme Leite da Silva & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2009. "Energy versus food: How do countries differ?," MPRA Paper 30730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Dario Guarascio & Mario Pianta & Matteo Lucchese & Francesco Bogliacino, 2015. "Business cycles, technology and exports," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 32(2), pages 167-200, August.
    17. Mai Farid, "undated". "Vertical Production and Macroeconomic Persistence: The Case of an Emerging Market Economy," Discussion Papers 09/11, Department of Economics, University of York.
    18. Fernanda Ricotta, 2009. "Trade In Intermediate Goods In Italian Manufacturing Industries," Working Papers 200915, Università della Calabria, Dipartimento di Economia, Statistica e Finanza "Giovanni Anania" - DESF.
    19. Faria, Weslem Rodrigues & Haddad, Eduardo Amaral & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2010. "A typology of propagation of technology and social preferences in the process of economic development: An input-output approach," MPRA Paper 30694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Marcial Echenique & Vadim Grinevich & Antony Hargreaves & Vassilis Zachariadis, 2011. "Implementation of a land use and spatial interaction model based on random utility choices and social accounting matrices," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1555, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:27:y:2015:i:2:p:133-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.