IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v30y2015i4p424-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing Space-Time Accessibility Towards the Implementation of the Light Rail System: The Case Study of Brescia

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Bonotti
  • Silvia Rossetti
  • Michela Tiboni
  • Maurizio Tira

Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology for investigation of the space-time relations of accessibility to public services and collective mobility. The paper assesses the space-time efficiency of local public transport facilities and makes an accessibility analysis as a baseline for evaluating future changes. It explains the potential for improvement and the effects on planning paradigms. Public transport accessibility greatly changes during day and night time so they should be assessed through multi-scaled and diachronic maps as a contribution to the timetable plan and overall planning strategies. The case study of Brescia, Italy is used to test the methodology. The new light rail system of Brescia entered into operation in 2013 and could change the entire form of urban mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Bonotti & Silvia Rossetti & Michela Tiboni & Maurizio Tira, 2015. "Analysing Space-Time Accessibility Towards the Implementation of the Light Rail System: The Case Study of Brescia," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 424-442, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:30:y:2015:i:4:p:424-442
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1028254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2015.1028254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2015.1028254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Handy, Susan L, 2002. "Accessibility- vs. Mobility-Enhancing Strategies for Addressing Automobile Dependence in the U.S," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5kn4s4pb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhansheng Liu & Yueyue Jiao & Anxiu Li & Ximei Liu, 2021. "Risk Assessment of Urban Rail Transit PPP Project Construction Based on Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Michela Tiboni & Silvia Rossetti & David Vetturi & Vincenza Torrisi & Francesco Botticini & Marco Domenico Schaefer, 2021. "Urban Policies and Planning Approaches for a Safer and Climate Friendlier Mobility in Cities: Strategies, Initiatives and Some Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Mizuki Kawabata, 2009. "Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Modal Accessibility Disparity in Boston and San Francisco," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 183-198, January.
    3. Mondschein, Andrew & Taylor, Brian D & Brumbaugh, Stephen, 2010. "Congestion And Accessibility: What’S The Relationship?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8135b0jh, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. João Monteiro & Ana Clara Carrilho & Nuno Sousa & Leise Kelli de Oliveira & Eduardo Natividade-Jesus & João Coutinho-Rodrigues, 2023. "Do We Live Where It Is Pleasant? Correlates of Perceived Pleasantness with Socioeconomic Variables," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Ahmed El-Geneidy & David Levinson, 2011. "Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 643-659, December.
    6. Ahmed El-Geneidy & David Levinson, 2007. "Mapping Accessibility Over Time," Working Papers 200709, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    7. Melo, Lucas Eduardo Araújo de & Isler, Cassiano Augusto, 2023. "Integrating link count data for enhanced estimation of deterrence functions: A case study of short-term bicycle network interventions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Hayati Sari Hasibuan & Mari Mulyani, 2022. "Transit-Oriented Development: Towards Achieving Sustainable Transport and Urban Development in Jakarta Metropolitan, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    9. te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Skou Nicolaisen, Morten & Büttner, Benjamin & Ferreira, Antonio, 2017. "Experiences with transportation models: An international survey of planning practices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 10-18.
    10. Manaugh, Kevin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2012. "What makes travel 'local': Defining and understanding local travel behaviour," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(3), pages 15-27.
    11. Mondschein, Andrew & Taylor, Brian D. & Brumbaugh, Stephen, 2011. "Congestion and Accessibility: What's the Relationship," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6bh2n9wx, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Mondschein, Andrew Samuel, 2013. "The Personal City: The Experiential, Cognitive Nature of Travel and Activity and Implications for Accessibility," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7014d9cg, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Yang, Wenyue & Chen, Bi Yu & Cao, Xiaoshu & Li, Tao & Li, Peng, 2017. "The spatial characteristics and influencing factors of modal accessibility gaps: A case study for Guangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 21-32.
    14. Vilhelmson, Bertil & Elldér, Erik, 2021. "Realizing proximity in times of deregulation and densification: Evaluating urban change from a welfare regime perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Chen, Na & Akar, Gulsah, 2016. "Effects of neighborhood types & socio-demographics on activity space," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 112-121.
    16. Boisjoly, Geneviève & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2016. "Daily fluctuations in transit and job availability: A comparative assessment of time-sensitive accessibility measures," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 73-81.
    17. Jin, Scarlett T. & Sui, Daniel Z., 2024. "Bikesharing and equity: A nationwide study of bikesharing accessibility in the U.S," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Michela Tiboni & Silvia Rossetti & David Vetturi & Vincenza Torrisi & Francesco Botticini & Marco Domenico Schaefer, 2021. "Urban Policies and Planning Approaches for a Safer and Climate Friendlier Mobility in Cities: Strategies, Initiatives and Some Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    19. António Ferreira & Els Beukers & Marco Te Brömmelstroet, 2012. "Accessibility is Gold, Mobility is Not: A Proposal for the Improvement of Dutch Transport-Related Cost-Benefit Analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(4), pages 683-697, August.
    20. Damurski Łukasz & Pluta Jacek & Zipser Wawrzyniec, 2020. "Pedestrian accessibility of services as a measure of territorial cohesion at the neighbourhood level," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 49(49), pages 31-48, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:30:y:2015:i:4:p:424-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.