IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v23y2005i3p327-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-dependent construction social costs model

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Der Yu
  • Shao-Shung Lo

Abstract

Negative impacts of construction works on local traffic, environment and business have been pointed out by previous researchers. However, little work has been conductd on the quantification of such costs. A time-dependent construction social costs (COSCO) model is developed for quantifying the negative impacts that result from construction operations during the field execution phase. The COSCO model is a simplified but practical model that calculates the construction social costs in a conservative way. A roadwork construction project is used to show the applicability of the COSCO model. It is found that the daily social cost was US$18 188-5.52 times the project construction cost. This is a striking illustration of management techniques for mediating the social costs of construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Der Yu & Shao-Shung Lo, 2005. "Time-dependent construction social costs model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 327-337.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:3:p:327-337
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190500040281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190500040281
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190500040281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evia Wong & Robin Yip, 2004. "Promoting sustainable construction waste management in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 563-566.
    2. Christopher Miller & Gary Packham & David Pickernell & Mark Mcgovern, 2004. "Building for the future: the potential importance of the construction industry in Welsh economic development policy," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 533-540.
    3. Timothy Michael Lewis, 2004. "The construction industry in the economy of Trinidad & Tobago," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 541-549.
    4. M. M. M. Teo & M. Loosemore, 2001. "A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 741-751.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zi-Yun Zhang & Fang-Le Peng & Chen-Xiao Ma & Hui Zhang & Su-Juan Fu, 2021. "External Benefit Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Udawatta, Nilupa & Zuo, Jian & Chiveralls, Keri & Zillante, George, 2015. "Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 73-83.
    2. Mekhala Kaluarachchi & Anuradha Waidyasekara & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Mitigating Dust Pollution from Construction Activities: A Behavioural Control Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Serenari, Christopher & Bosak, Keith & Attarian, Aram, 2013. "Cross-cultural efficacy of American low-impact programs: A comparison between Garhwal guide beliefs on environmental behavior and American outdoor travel norms," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 50-60.
    4. Farrelly, Trisia & Tucker, Corrina, 2014. "Action research and residential waste minimisation in Palmerston North, New Zealand," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 11-26.
    5. Esa, Mohd Reza & Halog, Anthony & Rigamonti, Lucia, 2017. "Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 219-229.
    6. Heni Fitriani & Saheed Ajayi & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the Underlying Causes of Waste Generation in Indonesia’s Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Vivian Tam & C. M. Tam & L. Y. Shen & S. X. Zeng & C. M. Ho, 2006. "Environmental performance assessment: perceptions of project managers on the relationship between operational and environmental performance indicators," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 287-299.
    8. Gi-Wook Cha & Young-Chan Kim & Hyeun Jun Moon & Won-Hwa Hong, 2017. "The Effects of Data Collection Method and Monitoring of Workers’ Behavior on the Generation of Demolition Waste," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Michael Pitt & Andrew Smith, 2003. "An assessment of waste management efficiency at BAA airports," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 421-431.
    10. Wang, Jiayuan & Li, Zhengdao & Tam, Vivian W.Y., 2014. "Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at the design stage: A Shenzhen case study, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-7.
    11. Isabel Jordan-Palomar & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Jorge García-Valldecabres & Eugenio Pellicer, 2018. "Protocol to Manage Heritage-Building Interventions Using Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Lu, Weisheng & Webster, Chris & Chen, Ke & Zhang, Xiaoling & Chen, Xi, 2017. "Computational Building Information Modelling for construction waste management: Moving from rhetoric to reality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 587-595.
    13. Lu, Weisheng & Yuan, Hongping, 2010. "Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 201-208.
    14. Li, Jingru & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Zuo, Jian & Zhu, Jiaolan, 2015. "Designers’ attitude and behaviour towards construction waste minimization by design: A study in Shenzhen, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 29-35.
    15. Pitt, Michael & Smith, Andrew, 2003. "Waste management efficiency at UK airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 103-111.
    16. Jiménez-Rivero, Ana & García-Navarro, Justo, 2017. "Exploring factors influencing post-consumer gypsum recycling and landfilling in the European Union," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 116-123.
    17. Park, Joo Young, 2014. "Assessing determinants of industrial waste reuse: The case of coal ash in the United States," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 116-127.
    18. Bakshan, Amal & Srour, Issam & Chehab, Ghassan & El-Fadel, Mutasem & Karaziwan, Jalal, 2017. "Behavioral determinants towards enhancing construction waste management: A Bayesian Network analysis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 274-284.
    19. Chitdrakantan Subramaniam & Syuhaida Ismail & Serdar Durdyev & Wan Nurul Mardiah Wan Mohd Rani & Nur Fatin Syazwani Abu Bakar & Audrius Banaitis, 2021. "Overcoming the Project Communications Management Breakdown amongst Foreign Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Biophilia Inveigled Construction Projects in Malaysia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Abdulmalek K. Badraddin & Rahimi A. Rahman & Saud Almutairi & Muneera Esa, 2021. "Main Challenges to Concrete Recycling in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:3:p:327-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.