IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i15p4077-d252486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Sites for the Treatment and the Final Disposal of Construction and Demolition Waste, Using Two Approaches: An Analysis for Mexico City

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Antonio Araiza-Aguilar

    (Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, External Circuit, University City, Coyoacan Delegation, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Constantino Gutiérrez-Palacios

    (Faculty of Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico, External Circuit, University City, Coyoacan Delegation, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • María Neftalí Rojas-Valencia

    (Institute of Engineering, National Autonomous University of Mexico, External Circuit, University City, Coyoacan Delegation, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Hugo Alejandro Nájera-Aguilar

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Science and Arts of Chiapas, North Beltway 1150, Lajas Maciel 29000, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, Mexico)

  • Rubén Fernando Gutiérrez-Hernández

    (Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, National Technological of Mexico-Technological Institute of Tapachula, Km 2, Highway to Puerto Madero 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico)

  • Rodrigo Antonio Aguilar-Vera

    (Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, External Circuit, University City, Coyoacan Delegation, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

Abstract

This paper proposes a solution to the current problems of Mexico City (Ciudad de México) with respect to construction and demolition waste, through a spatial analysis to locate a waste treatment and disposal infrastructure. Two analysis methodologies, specifically the multi-criteria evaluation technique and network analysis, are used with the support of geographic information systems. The results of the multi-criteria evaluation technique indicate that the most suitable places for this infrastructure location are in the south and southeast of the study area, in the Tlalpan, Milpa Alta, Xochimilco and Cuajimalpa boroughs. The results of the network analysis technique indicate that four facilities strategically located in Miguel Hidalgo, Gustavo A. Madero, Tlahuac and Tlalpan boroughs would permit the provision of service to almost all waste generation points in the study area. Decision makers in Mexico City can use either of the two approaches. If the objective is to find the best location of a single place for the treatment or disposal of huge amounts of waste, the results obtained with the multi-criteria evaluation technique should be used. On the other hand, if waste treatment is favored over final disposal, decision makers should use the results of the network analysis technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Antonio Araiza-Aguilar & Constantino Gutiérrez-Palacios & María Neftalí Rojas-Valencia & Hugo Alejandro Nájera-Aguilar & Rubén Fernando Gutiérrez-Hernández & Rodrigo Antonio Aguilar-Vera, 2019. "Selection of Sites for the Treatment and the Final Disposal of Construction and Demolition Waste, Using Two Approaches: An Analysis for Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4077-:d:252486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4077/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4077/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evia Wong & Robin Yip, 2004. "Promoting sustainable construction waste management in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 563-566.
    2. Constantine Toregas & Ralph Swain & Charles ReVelle & Lawrence Bergman, 1971. "The Location of Emergency Service Facilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 1363-1373, October.
    3. Helen Lingard & Guinevere Gilbert & Peter Graham, 2001. "Improving solid waste reduction and recycling performance using goal setting and feedback," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 809-817.
    4. Richard Church & Charles R. Velle, 1974. "The Maximal Covering Location Problem," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 101-118, January.
    5. S. L. Hakimi, 1964. "Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 450-459, June.
    6. Marianov, Vladimir & Revelle, Charles, 1994. "The queuing probabilistic location set covering problem and some extensions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-178.
    7. P J Densham & G Rushton, 1992. "Strategies for Solving Large Location-Allocation Problems by Heuristic Methods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(2), pages 289-304, February.
    8. Chi Sun Poon & Ann Tit Wan Yu & Siu Ching See & Esther Cheung, 2004. "Minimizing demolition wastes in Hong Kong public housing projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 799-805, October.
    9. S. L. Hakimi, 1965. "Optimum Distribution of Switching Centers in a Communication Network and Some Related Graph Theoretic Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 462-475, June.
    10. Alan Tan Tong Kein & George Ofori & Cle Briffett, 1999. "ISO 14000: Its relevance to the construction industry of Singapore and its potential as the next industry milestone," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 449-461.
    11. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wei & Wu, Shining & Wang, Shuaian & Zhen, Lu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Emergency facility location problems in logistics: Status and perspectives," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Xiujuan Zhao & Wei Xu & Yunjia Ma & Fuyu Hu, 2015. "Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Optimum Allocation Model for Earthquake Emergency Shelters Using a Modified Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm: A Case Study in Chaoyang District, Beijing, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Dayanna Rodrigues da Cunha Nunes & Orivalde Soares da Silva Júnior & Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira & Yesus Emmanuel Medeiros Vieira, 2023. "A Robust Stochastic Programming Model for the Well Location Problem: The Case of The Brazilian Northeast Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Mahmutoğulları, Özlem & Yaman, Hande, 2023. "Robust alternative fuel refueling station location problem with routing under decision-dependent flow uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 173-188.
    5. Mark S. Daskin, 2008. "What you should know about location modeling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 283-294, June.
    6. Jianfeng Lu & Qiang Yang, 2022. "Location Optimization of Emergency Station for Dangerous Goods Accidents Considering Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Yunjia Ma & Wei Xu & Lianjie Qin & Xiujuan Zhao, 2019. "Site Selection Models in Natural Disaster Shelters: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Michael J. Brusco, 2022. "Solving Classic Discrete Facility Location Problems Using Excel Spreadsheets," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 160-171, May.
    9. Eliş, Haluk & Tansel, Barbaros & Oğuz, Osman & Güney, Mesut & Kian, Ramez, 2021. "On guarding real terrains: The terrain guarding and the blocking path problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Jiwon Baik & Alan T. Murray, 2022. "Locating a facility to simultaneously address access and coverage goals," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(5), pages 1199-1217, October.
    11. Xin Feng & Alan T. Murray, 2018. "Allocation using a heterogeneous space Voronoi diagram," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 207-226, July.
    12. Knight, V.A. & Harper, P.R. & Smith, L., 2012. "Ambulance allocation for maximal survival with heterogeneous outcome measures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 918-926.
    13. Amir Hossein Sadeghi & Ziyuan Sun & Amirreza Sahebi-Fakhrabad & Hamid Arzani & Robert Handfield, 2023. "A Mixed-Integer Linear Formulation for a Dynamic Modified Stochastic p-Median Problem in a Competitive Supply Chain Network Design," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Mingjian Wu & Tae J. Kwon & Karim El-Basyouny, 2020. "A Citywide Location-Allocation Framework for Driver Feedback Signs: Optimizing Safety and Coverage of Vulnerable Road Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Zhi-Chun Li & Qian Liu, 2020. "Optimal deployment of emergency rescue stations in an urban transportation corridor," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 445-473, February.
    16. Comber, Alexis & Dickie, Jennifer & Jarvis, Claire & Phillips, Martin & Tansey, Kevin, 2015. "Locating bioenergy facilities using a modified GIS-based location–allocation-algorithm: Considering the spatial distribution of resource supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 309-316.
    17. Li, Hongmei & Luo, Taibo & Xu, Yinfeng & Xu, Jiuping, 2018. "Minimax regret vertex centdian location problem in general dynamic networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 87-96.
    18. Kayode J. Samuel, 2010. "Infrastructure Location," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 2(1), pages 71-90, June.
    19. Wei Wang & Zihao Zhou & Jun Chen & Wen Cheng & Jian Chen, 2021. "Analysis of Location Selection of Public Service Facilities Based on Urban Land Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-20, January.
    20. Bell, John E. & Griffis, Stanley E. & Cunningham III, William A. & Eberlan, Jon A., 2011. "Location optimization of strategic alert sites for homeland defense," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 151-158, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:15:p:4077-:d:252486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.