IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v16y1998i2p177-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstacles to implementing total quality management in the UK construction industry

Author

Listed:
  • Mazin Shammas-Toma
  • David Seymour
  • Leslie Clark

Abstract

Since at least the Tavistock studies, the need to improve communication and coordination in the construction process has been stressed. This paper reports from a study of 25 construction projects where QA and a number of procedures were in use which might have been expected to bring such improvement. The finding was, however, that coordination was poor. The purpose of the paper is to consider how this finding is to be explained. With reference to the markets/hierarchy theoretical framework, it is proposed that the use of this and other similar frameworks in fact obscures the empirical reality which they are intended to explain. It is accepted that the meta-language which such frameworks supply may enable researchers and those practitioners who choose to use this language to share their interests and concerns. However, the relationship between the abstract and global concepts which feature in such talk and the reality to which they refer needs closer enquiry. This paper proposes that our knowledge of the impact of QA has been compromised by the lack of such attention. The paper then inspects the global proposition that QA has been a step in the right direction towards TQM. With the aim of giving this proposition a stronger empirical referent, six key principles of TQM are used as a benchmark against which to assess the significance of the empirical data drawn from the study. It is proposed that greater attention to such data is necessary to provide a sounder basis for establishing what needs to be done to stimulate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Mazin Shammas-Toma & David Seymour & Leslie Clark, 1998. "Obstacles to implementing total quality management in the UK construction industry," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 177-192.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:177-192
    DOI: 10.1080/014461998372475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014461998372475
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/014461998372475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahid Hussain & Zhu Fangwei & Ahmed Faisal Siddiqi & Zaigham Ali & Muhammad Salman Shabbir, 2018. "Structural Equation Model for Evaluating Factors Affecting Quality of Social Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Lars Huemer & Katarina Östergren, 2000. "Strategic change and organizational learning in two 'Swedish' construction firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 635-642, December.
    3. Mehmet Tolga Taner, 2013. "Critical Success Factors for Six Sigma Implementation in Large-scale Turkish Construction Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 3(4), pages 212-225.
    4. Anna Dubois & Lars-Erik Gadde, 2002. "The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(7), pages 621-631.
    5. Rodney Stewart & Clinton Spencer, 2006. "Six-sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: a case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 339-348.
    6. Ahmet DEMIR & Mustafa MUKHLIS, 2017. "An Evaluation Of Gated Communities As A Product: An Empirical Study In Sulaimaniyah, Iraq," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 63-84, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:177-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.