IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v22y2017i4p366-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Zeenat Kotval-K
  • Cassi Meitl
  • Zenia Kotval

Abstract

In the US and Germany, various public funding tools are available to make brownfield redevelopment projects financially feasible. The practices of private or public sector involvement differ from an international perspective. The following discussion will explore funding practices in the US and Germany. In Germany, there is a long tradition of public sector involvement while the US is predominately driven by private sector funding. A comparison will help identify long-standing practices in Germany and how they might be adapted to the US context. In a manner similar to the previous chapter on policies and programs, findings in this chapter are discussed at federal US, state of Michigan and local municipal levels, and European Union, Germany, and local-level funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeenat Kotval-K & Cassi Meitl & Zenia Kotval, 2017. "Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 366-383, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:366-383
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2017.1296760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2017.1296760
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2017.1296760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeenat Kotval-K, 2016. "Brownfield Redevelopment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(3), pages 275-282, August.
    2. Hunter Bacot & Cindy O’Dell, 2006. "Establishing Indicators to Evaluate Brownfield Redevelopment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(2), pages 142-161, May.
    3. Robert Shaw, 2002. "The International Building Exhibition (IBA) Emscher Park, Germany: A Model for Sustainable Restructuring?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 77-97, January.
    4. Todd K. BenDor & Sara S. Metcalf & Mark Paich, 2011. "The Dynamics of Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Gert-Jan Hospers, 2004. "Restructuring Europe’s Rustbelt," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 39(3), pages 147-156, May.
    6. Marie Howland, 2003. "Private Initiative and Public Responsibility for the Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields: Three Baltimore Case Studies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 17(4), pages 367-381, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brita Hermelin & Robert Jonsson, 2021. "Governance of Waterfront Regeneration Projects: Experiences from Two Second‐tier Cities in Sweden," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 266-281, March.
    2. Tomáš Krejčí & Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Ryan J. Frazier & Petr Klusáček & Kamil Pícha & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2021. "Spatial Unevenness of Formation, Remediation and Persistence of Post-Agricultural Brownfields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Zvirgzdiņš Jānis & Plotka Kaspars & Geipele Sanda, 2018. "Eco-Economics in Cities and Rural Areas," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 88-99, July.
    4. Heng Zhang & Guiwen Liu & Qingye Han & Gong Chen, 2022. "Mapping the Barriers of Utilizing Public Private Partnership into Brownfield Remediation Projects in the Public Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    3. Sławomir Pytel & Sławomir Sitek & Marta Chmielewska & Elżbieta Zuzańska-Żyśko & Anna Runge & Julita Markiewicz-Patkowska, 2021. "Transformation Directions of Brownfields: The Case of the Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Lageman Bernhard & Neumann Uwe & Schmidt Christoph M., 2006. "Und täglich grüßt die Subvention: Wie kann die erfolgreiche Revitalisierung des Ruhrgebiets gelingen?," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 50(1), pages 232-244, October.
    6. Hongjun Dai & Tao Sun & Wen Guo, 2016. "Brownfield Redevelopment Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Real Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
    7. Nyuying Wang & Oleg Golubchikov & Wei Chen & Zhigao Liu, 2020. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Post-Industrial Beijing: Communism, Neoliberalism, and Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Jihong Li & Kaiming Li & Rongxu Qiu, 2022. "The Suburbanization and Revitalization of Industrial Land in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Michael Trouw & Stephan Weiler & Jesse Silverstein, 2020. "Brownfield Development: Uncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Risk Premia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Weith, Thomas, 2009. "Abschied vom Gleichwertigkeitspostulat?!: Zur inhaltlichen Neuausrichtung räumlicher Entwicklungsziele für Schrumpfungsregionen im Kontext veränderter Förderpolitiken," Arbeitsmaterial der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Eich-Born, Marion (ed.), Räumlich differenzierte Entwicklungs- und Förderstrategien für Nordostdeutschland für Nordostdeutschland, volume 127, pages 156-178, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    11. Marie Howland, 2007. "Employment Effects of Brownfield Redevelopment What Do We Know from the Literature?," NCEE Working Paper Series 200701, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Jan 2007.
    12. Farzan Yahya & Muhammad Rafiq, 2020. "Brownfield, greenfield, and renewable energy consumption: Moderating role of effective governance," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(3), pages 405-423, May.
    13. Maria Bostenaru Dan & Magdalena Maria Bostenaru-Dan, 2021. "Greening the Brownfields of Thermal Power Plants in Rural Areas, an Example from Romania, Set in the Context of Developments in the Industrialized Country of Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Doron Lavee & Tomer Ash & Gilat Baniad, 2012. "Cost‐benefit analysis of soil remediation in Israeli industrial zones," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(4), pages 285-299, November.
    15. Kolosz, B.W. & Athanasiadis, I.N. & Cadisch, G. & Dawson, T.P. & Giupponi, C. & Honzák, M. & Martinez-Lopez, J. & Marvuglia, A. & Mojtahed, V. & Ogutu, K.B.Z. & Van Delden, H. & Villa, F. & Balbi, S., 2018. "Conceptual advancement of socio-ecological modelling of ecosystem services for re-evaluating Brownfield land," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PA), pages 29-39.
    16. Koutra, Sesil & Bouillard, Philippe & Becue, Vincent & Cenci, Jeremy & Zhang, Jiazhen, 2023. "From ‘brown’ to ‘bright’: Key issues and challenges in former industrialized areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Melichová Katarína & Melišková Ina & Palšová Lucia, 2018. "Land Withdrawal Vs. Regional Development: Does Withdrawal of Agricultural Land Lead to Increase in Entrepreneurial Activity and Generate Positive Spatial Spillovers? (Slovak Republic)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 590-613, December.
    18. Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent & Wade, Belinda & Rekker, Saphira & Greig, Chris, 2022. "A systematic review of barriers to greenfield investment in decarbonisation solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga & Aleksandra Zdyrko & Jakub Bednarczyk, 2021. "Semi-Natural Areas on Post-Mining Brownfields as an Opportunity to Strengthen the Attractiveness of a Small Town. An Example of Radzionków in Southern Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Joaquin Ameller & Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Corinne Merly, 2020. "The contribution of economic science to brownfield redevelopment: a review," Post-Print hal-02532209, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:366-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.