IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v20y2006i2p142-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing Indicators to Evaluate Brownfield Redevelopment

Author

Listed:
  • Hunter Bacot

    (Elon University, Elon, NC)

  • Cindy O’Dell

    (City of Charlotte, NC)

Abstract

In this research, the authors identify and assess economic and environmental criteria useful for analyzing local government brownfield programs. Based on their results, the authors suggest that property values, private investment, public investment, and grant funding are common constituents of local government brownfield programs. After settling on criteria for these program features, the authors apply these to a case example in Charlotte, North Carolina, to assess their usefulness for a local program. The authors recommend several indicators be recognized as common, practical, and valid measures for assessing the viability of local brownfield programs. To institutionalize standard measures, however, states must require such data collection through Brownfield Agreements with private developers. To standardize indicators, there must be federal leadership to ensure uniformity and comparability across levels of governments and programs. The Environmental Protection Agency must direct the collection of useful factors for assessing successful brownfield conversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunter Bacot & Cindy O’Dell, 2006. "Establishing Indicators to Evaluate Brownfield Redevelopment," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(2), pages 142-161, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:20:y:2006:i:2:p:142-161
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242405285749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242405285749
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242405285749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bashir, S.A., 2002. "Home is where the harm is: Inadequate housing as a public health crisis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(5), pages 733-738.
    2. Leviton, L.C. & Snell, E. & McGinnis, M., 2000. "Urban issues in health promotion strategies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(6), pages 863-866.
    3. Daniel L. Millimet, 2003. "Environmental Abatement Costs and Establishment Size," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 21(3), pages 281-296, July.
    4. Kimberly Winson-Geideman & Robert Simons & John Pendergrass, 2004. "Tracking remediation and redevelopment trends of brownfield clean-up programmes: the Cook County experience," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 393-405.
    5. Sandra Alker & Victoria Joy & Peter Roberts & Nathan Smith, 2000. "The Definition of Brownfield," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 49-69.
    6. Cutter, S.L. & Scott, M.S. & Hill, A.A., 2002. "Spatial variability in toxicity indicators used to rank chemical risks," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(3), pages 420-422.
    7. Robert Simons & John Pendergrass & Kimberly Winson-Geideman, 2003. "Quantifying Long-term Environmental Regulatory Risk for Brownfields: Are Reopeners Really an Issue?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 257-269.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeenat Kotval-K & Cassi Meitl & Zenia Kotval, 2017. "Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 366-383, October.
    2. Todd K. BenDor & Sara S. Metcalf & Mark Paich, 2011. "The Dynamics of Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Adams & Christopher De Sousa & Steven Tiesdell, 2010. "Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 75-104, January.
    2. Melissa Chinchilla & Mariana C. Arcaya, 2017. "Using Health Impact Assessment as an Interdisciplinary Teaching Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    4. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    5. Chintrakarn, Pandej & Millimet, Daniel L., 2006. "The environmental consequences of trade: Evidence from subnational trade flows," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 430-453, July.
    6. Marjorie Tendero & Cécile Bazart, 2018. "" Empty lands " ? Social representations of contaminated brownfields in France," Working Papers halshs-01709548, HAL.
    7. Brittany E Evans & Anja C Huizink & Kirstin Greaves-Lord & Joke H M Tulen & Karin Roelofs & Jan van der Ende, 2020. "Urbanicity, biological stress system functioning and mental health in adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    9. Becker, Randy A. & Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ronald J., 2013. "Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures survey," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 523-538.
    10. Kronenburg García, Angela & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Sitoe, Almeida A., 2022. "Waves and legacies: The making of an investment frontier in Niassa, Mozambique," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1).
    11. Ricardo J. G. Mateus & João C. Bana e Costa & Pedro Verga Matos, 2017. "Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 495-521, May.
    12. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    13. Kai Hockerts, 2015. "A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 102-122, February.
    14. Becker, Randy A. & Pasurka, Carl & Shadbegian, Ronald J., 2013. "Do environmental regulations disproportionately affect small businesses? Evidence from the Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures survey," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 523-538.
    15. Phillips II, Gregory & McCuskey, David J. & Felt, Dylan & Raman, Anand B. & Hayford, Christina S. & Pickett, Jim & Shenkman, Julia & Lindeman, Peter T. & Mustanski, Brian, 2020. "Geospatial perspectives on health: The PrEP4Love campaign and the role of local context in health promotion messaging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    16. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Clair, Amy & Baker, Emma, 2022. "Cold homes and mental health harm: Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    18. Donaldson, Ross & Lord, Richard, 2018. "Can brownfield land be reused for ground source heating to alleviate fuel poverty?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 344-355.
    19. Pasqualino Boschetto & Alessandro Bove & Elena Mazzola, 2022. "Comparative Review of Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Dorit Kerret & George M. Gray, 2007. "What Do We Learn from Emissions Reporting? Analytical Considerations and Comparison of Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers in the United States, Canada, England, and Australia," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 203-223, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:20:y:2006:i:2:p:142-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.