IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ceasxx/v56y2004i3p421-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

East European protest politics in the early 1990s: comparative trends and preliminary theories

Author

Listed:
  • Pieter Vanhuysse

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Pieter Vanhuysse, 2004. "East European protest politics in the early 1990s: comparative trends and preliminary theories," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 421-438.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:56:y:2004:i:3:p:421-438
    DOI: 10.1080/09668130410001682708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09668130410001682708
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09668130410001682708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira,Luiz Carlos Bresser & Maravall,José María & Przeworski,Adam, 1993. "Economic Reforms in New Democracies," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521432597, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barlow, David & Radulescu, Roxana, 2005. "The sequencing of reform in transition economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 835-850, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John S. Earle & Scott Gehlbach, 2003. "A Spoonful of Sugar: Privatization and Popular Support for Reform in the Czech Republic," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, March.
    2. Corrales, Javier & Cisneros, Imelda, 1999. "Corporatism, Trade Liberalization and Sectoral Responses: The Case of Venezuela, 1989-99," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 2099-2122, December.
    3. Elena Gaber & Leonid Polishchuk & Kharis Sokolov & Denis Stukal, 2019. "Chronicles of a democracy postponed : Cultural legacy of the Russian transition," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 27(1), pages 99-137, January.
    4. Ethan Kapstein & Nathan Converse, 2006. "The Economics of Young Democracies: Policies and Performance," Working Papers 85, Center for Global Development.
    5. James Alexander, 1998. "Uncertain conditions in the Russian transition: The popular drive towards stability in a ‘stateless’ environment," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 415-443.
    6. Yao-Jen Fan & Shuo-Fang Liu & Ding-Bang Luh & Pei-Shan Teng, 2021. "Corporate Sustainability: Impact Factors on Organizational Innovation in the Industrial Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Hausken, Kjell & Plümper, Thomas & Schneider, Gerald, 2002. "The Trilemma of the Protectionist Autocrat: An Assessment of the Political Determinants of Foreign Economic Liberalization," MPRA Paper 75866, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Bernd Hayo & Doh Shin, 2002. "Mass Attitudes Toward Financial Crisis and Economic Reform in Korea," Development and Comp Systems 0205003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kai-Chih Chang & Tsuifang Hsieh, 2017. "From Having Fun to Applause: The Study of Relationships among Festival Benefits, Festival Identity and Festival Support by Viewpoints of the Hosts and Guests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Jain, Sanjay & Sharun Mukand, 2003. "Public Opinion and the Dynamics of Reform," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 114, Royal Economic Society.
    11. Dani Rodrik, 1998. "Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 997-1032, October.
    12. Bresser Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 1995. "Latin Amerika az "állam válsága" megközelítés fényében [The crisis of the state approach to Latin America]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 533-551.
    13. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 2000. "After structuralism, a development alternative for Latin America," Textos para discussão 99, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    14. Kapstein, Ethan & Converse, Nathan, 2006. "The Economics of Young Democracies: Policies and Performance," MPRA Paper 553, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Natkhov, T. & Polishchuk, L., 2017. "Political Economy of Institutions and Development: The Importance of Being Inclusive. Reflection on "Why Nations Fail" by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part II. Institutional Change and Impli," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 12-32.
    16. Sylviane GUILLAUMONT JEANNENEY & Ping HUA, 2000. "Ouverture économique et dépenses publiques en Chine : une analyse régionale," Working Papers 200006, CERDI.
    17. Alvaro Forteza & Daniel Buquet & Mario Ibarburu & Jorge Lanzaro & Andrés Pereyra & Eduardo Siandra & Marcel Vaillant, 2003. "Understanding reform. The Uruguayan case," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0603, Department of Economics - dECON.
    18. Hayo, Bernd, 1999. "Micro and macro determinants of public support for market reforms in Eastern Europe," ZEI Working Papers B 25-1999, University of Bonn, ZEI - Center for European Integration Studies.
    19. José Alemán, 2008. "Labor Market Deregulation and Industrial Conflict in New Democracies: A Cross‐National Analysis," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 830-856, December.
    20. Mariano Tommasi, 2002. "Crisis, Political Institutions and Policy Reform: It Is Not the Policy, It Is the Polity, Stupid," Working Papers 49, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Jun 2004.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ceasxx:v:56:y:2004:i:3:p:421-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ceas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.