IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v44y2012i2p219-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation in universal prevention programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Rosenman
  • Scott Goates
  • Laura Hill

Abstract

We analyse family decisions to participate in community-based universal substance-abuse prevention programmes through the framework of expected utility theory. Family functioning, which has been shown to be a good indicator of child risk for substance abuse, provides a useful reference point for family decision making. Our results show that well-functioning families (with children at low risk for substance use) should have the lowest incentive to participate, but that high-risk families may also opt out of prevention programmes. For programmes that are most effective for high-risk youth, this could be a problem. Using data from the Strengthening Families Programme (SFP) and the Washington Healthy Youth Survey (HYS), we empirically test the implications of our model and find that at least for one measure of family functioning those families with children most likely to be at risk for substance use are opting out of the programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Rosenman & Scott Goates & Laura Hill, 2012. "Participation in universal prevention programmes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 219-228, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:44:y:2012:i:2:p:219-228
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2010.502111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2010.502111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2010.502111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imbens, Guido W, 1992. "An Efficient Method of Moments Estimator for Discrete Choice Models with Choice-Based Sampling," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(5), pages 1187-1214, September.
    2. Ana Isabel Gil & Jose Alberto Molina, 2007. "Human development and alcohol abuse in adolescence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1315-1323.
    3. Hill, L.G. & Goates, S.G. & Rosenman, R., 2010. "Detecting selection effects in community implementations of family-based substance abuse prevention programs," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(4), pages 623-630.
    4. Ambrose Leung, 2004. "Delinquency, schooling, and work: time allocation decision of youth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 987-993.
    5. Cosslett, Stephen R, 1981. "Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Choice-Based Samples," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(5), pages 1289-1316, September.
    6. Robert J. Brent, 1998. "Estimating the effectiveness and benefits of alcohol treatment programmes for use in economic evaluations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 217-226, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erard Brian, 2022. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A New and More Versatile Approach," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 35-53, January.
    2. Erard, Brian, 2017. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A Calibrated Qualitative Response Estimation Approach," MPRA Paper 79927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Nkegbe, Paul Kwame & Abdul Mumin, Yazeed, 2022. "Impact of community development initiatives and access to community markets on household food security and nutrition in Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmeralda Ramalho, 2004. "Covariate Measurement Error in Endogenous Stratified Samples," Economics Working Papers 2_2004, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    2. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2024. "Causal Inference Under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 998-1009, July.
    3. Daniel McFadden, 2001. "Economic Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
    4. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
    5. Wonsang Ryu & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Thomas H. Brush, 2020. "The effects of multimarket contact on partner selection for technology cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 267-289, February.
    6. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.
    7. Kyungchul Song, 2009. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Treatment-Based Sampling," PIER Working Paper Archive 09-011, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. Gonzalez, Pedro & Vasconcellos, Geraldo M. & Kish, Richard J., 1998. "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The undervaluation hypothesis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-45.
    9. Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Joaquim J. S. Ramalho, 2006. "Two‐Step Empirical Likelihood Estimation Under Stratified Sampling When Aggregate Information Is Available," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(5), pages 577-592, September.
    10. Imbens, Guido W. & Lancaster, Tony, 1996. "Efficient estimation and stratified sampling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 289-318, October.
    11. Shi Chang & Rohan Singh Wilkho & Nasir Gharaibeh & Garett Sansom & Michelle Meyer & Francisco Olivera & Lei Zou, 2023. "Environmental, climatic, and situational factors influencing the probability of fatality or injury occurrence in flash flooding: a rare event logistic regression predictive model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3957-3978, April.
    12. Shi, Mengze & Yang, Botao & Chiang, Jeongwen, 2018. "Dyad Calling Behavior: Asymmetric Power and Tie Strength Dynamics," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 63-79.
    13. Butler, J. S., 2000. "Efficiency results of MLE and GMM estimation with sampling weights," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 25-37, May.
    14. Ramalho, Esmeralda A., 2002. "Regression models for choice-based samples with misclassification in the response variable," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 171-201, January.
    15. Esmeralda Ramalho & Joaquim Ramalho, 2006. "Bias-Corrected Moment-Based Estimators for Parametric Models Under Endogenous Stratified Sampling," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 475-496.
    16. Ahmed, M.S. & Attouch, M.K. & Dabo-Niang, S., 2018. "Binary functional linear models under choice-based sampling," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 134-152.
    17. Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Richard J. Smith, 2013. "Discrete Choice Non-Response," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(1), pages 343-364.
    18. Esmerelda A. Ramalho & Richard Smith, 2003. "Discrete choice non-response," CeMMAP working papers 07/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. Wayne E. Baker & Nathaniel Bulkley, 2014. "Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1493-1510, October.
    20. Ramalho Esmeralda A., 2010. "Covariate Measurement Error: Bias Reduction under Response-Based Sampling," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:44:y:2012:i:2:p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.