IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v27y1997i3p219-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear Information Dynamics, Dividend Irrelevance, Corporate Valuation and the Clean Surplus Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew W. Stark

Abstract

This paper adopts the linear information dynamics framework pioneered in Ohlson (1979) and Garman and Ohlson (1980) (and subsequently used in, in particular, Ohlson, 1989, 1995 and Feltham and Ohlson, 1995) for thinking about desirable properties of earnings numbers in the context of the market valuation of firms, where such valuations are fundamentally based on expected future dividends. The first purpose of this paper is to consider the valuation-relevance of clean surplus earnings when there are two distinct components of clean surplus earnings whose evolutions are governed, along with book value and dividends, by a system of linear information dynamics, and dividend irrelevancy holds. The system of linear information dynamics assumed ensures that corporate value is a linear combination of the two components of clean surplus earnings, book value and dividends. One question becomes—under what circumstances are clean surplus earnings (combined with book value and dividends) sufficient for corporate valuation without a knowledge of the breakdown of clean surplus earnings into its separate components? This paper develops the conditions defining these circumstances. At the other extreme, another question can be asked—under what circumstances is one component of clean surplus earnings irrelevant to corporate valuation? This paper identifies some conditions that identify these latter circumstances. The second purpose of the paper is to identify implications of these results for both the traditional arguments about the desirability of measuring earnings on a clean surplus basis and also the more contemporary issues surrounding FRS3. A third purpose is to discuss the implications of the overall analysis for the empirical testing of the relationship between market prices and earnings numbers, and for empirically-justified definitions of maintainable earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew W. Stark, 1997. "Linear Information Dynamics, Dividend Irrelevance, Corporate Valuation and the Clean Surplus Relationship," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 219-228, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1997:i:3:p:219-228
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1997.9729546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.1997.9729546
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.1997.9729546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Jiang & Yun Shen, 2009. ""Discussion of" Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3-4), pages 289-296.
    2. Akbar, S, 2007. "The Separate Valuation Relevance of Earnings, Book Value and their Components in Profit and Loss Making Firms: UK Evidence," MPRA Paper 5665, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Wei Jiang & Yun Shen, 2009. "Discussion of Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3‐4), pages 289-296, April.
    4. Pengguo Wang, 2013. "The role of disaggregation of earnings in stock valuation and earnings forecasting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 530-557, October.
    5. Lu, Hsueh-Tien, 2018. "Voluntary disclosure and the pricing of earnings components," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 64-73.
    6. Courtenay, Stephen M. & Cahan, Steven F., 2004. "The impact of debt on market reactions to the revaluation of noncurrent assets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 219-243, April.
    7. Pope, Peter F., 2010. "Bridging the gap between accounting and finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 88-102.
    8. Al-Hares, Osama M. & AbuGhazaleh, Naser M. & Haddad, Ayman E., 2012. "Value relevance of earnings, book value and dividends in an emerging capital market: Kuwait evidence," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 221-234.
    9. Mark Tippett, 2004. "Discussion of Interim Reporting Frequency and Financial Analysts’ Expenditures," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1‐2), pages 199-207, January.
    10. Pooja Kumari & Chandra Sekhar Mishra, 2020. "Equity Values and Prediction of Earnings with Disaggregation of Earnings in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 21(4), pages 990-1010, August.
    11. Colin Clubb & Martin Walker, 2014. "Payout Policy Relevance and Accounting-based Valuation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(4), pages 490-516, December.
    12. Veltri, Stefania & Ferraro, Olga, 2018. "Does other comprehensive income matter in credit-oriented systems? Analyzing the Italian context," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 18-31.
    13. Clare Roberts & Yue Wang, 2009. "Accounting harmonization and the value‐relevance of dirty surplus accounting flows," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 340-368, October.
    14. Carien van Mourik & Yuko Katsuo Asami, 2018. "Articulation, Profit or Loss and OCI in the IASB Conceptual Framework: Different Shades of Clean (or Dirty) Surplus," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 167-192, May.
    15. Saeed Akbar & Andrew W. Stark, 2003. "Discussion of Scale and the Scale Effect in Market‐based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1‐2), pages 57-72, January.
    16. Philippe Touron, 2016. "Mesures de la performance et les autres éléments du résultat global (OCI) : état de l'art," Post-Print hal-01902529, HAL.
    17. Pengguo Wang, 2014. "On the relevance of earnings components in valuation and forecasting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 399-413, April.
    18. Akbar, Saeed & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Stark, Andrew W., 2011. "The value relevance of cash flows, current accruals, and non-current accruals in the UK," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 311-319.
    19. Igor Goncharov & Allan Hodgson, 2008. "Comprehensive Income In Europe: Valuation, Prediction And Conservative Issues," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(10), pages 1-1.
    20. Pawel Bilinski, 2014. "Do Analysts Disclose Cash Flow Forecasts with Earnings Estimates when Earnings Quality is Low?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3-4), pages 401-434, April.
    21. Alan Gregory & Walid Saleh & Jon Tucker, 2005. "A UK Test of an Inflation‐Adjusted Ohlson Model," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3‐4), pages 487-534, April.
    22. Arturo Leccadito & Stefania Veltri, 2015. "A regime switching Ohlson model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2015-2035, September.
    23. Wayne R. Landsman & Bruce L. Miller & Shu Yeh, 2007. "Implications of Components of Income Excluded from Pro Forma Earnings for Future Profitability and Equity Valuation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3‐4), pages 650-675, April.
    24. Kazbi Soonawalla, 2006. "Accounting for Joint Ventures and Associates in Canada, UK, and US: Do US Rules Hide Information?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3‐4), pages 395-417, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:27:y:1997:i:3:p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.