IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v9y2000i2p417-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing linearity of regression models with dependent errors by kernel based methods

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Biedermann
  • Holger Dette

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Biedermann & Holger Dette, 2000. "Testing linearity of regression models with dependent errors by kernel based methods," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 417-438, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:417-438
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02595743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02595743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02595743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alcalá, J. T. & Cristóbal, J. A. & González-Manteiga, W., 1999. "Goodness-of-fit test for linear models based on local polynomials," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 39-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    2. Zhang, Rongmao & Chan, Ngai Hang & Chi, Changxiong, 2023. "Nonparametric testing for the specification of spatial trend functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Anouar El Ghouch & Marc G. Genton & Taoufik Bouezmarni, 2013. "Measuring the Discrepancy of a Parametric Model via Local Polynomial Smoothing," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(3), pages 455-470, September.
    4. Dette, Holger & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2000. "Nonparametric analysis of covariance," Technical Reports 2000,42, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    5. Andrea Meilán-Vila & Jean D. Opsomer & Mario Francisco-Fernández & Rosa M. Crujeiras, 2020. "A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(3), pages 728-749, September.
    6. Bücher, Axel & Dette, Holger & Wieczorek, Gabriele, 2011. "Testing model assumptions in functional regression models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1472-1488, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biedermann, Stefanie & Dette, Holger, 2000. "Testing linearity of regression models with dependent errors by kernel based methods," Technical Reports 2000,40, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    2. Dette, Holger & Hetzler, Benjamin, 2004. "Specification tests indexed by bandwidths," Technical Reports 2004,48, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    3. Dette, Holger & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2000. "Nonparametric analysis of covariance," Technical Reports 2000,42, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    4. Heuchenne, Cédric & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2010. "Goodness-of-fit tests for the error distribution in nonparametric regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1942-1951, August.
    5. Dette, Holger, 2000. "On a nonparametric test for linear relationships," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 307-316, February.
    6. Mario Francisco-Fernández & Juan Vilar-Fernández, 2009. "Two tests for heteroscedasticity in nonparametric regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 145-163, February.
    7. Gijbels, Irène & Rousson, Valentin, 2001. "A nonparametric least-squares test for checking a polynomial relationship," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 253-261, February.
    8. Gilles R. Ducharme & Bénédicte Fontez, 2004. "A Smooth Test of Goodness-of-Fit for Growth Curves and Monotonic Nonlinear Regression Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 977-986, December.
    9. J. Opsomer & M. Francisco-Fernández, 2010. "Finding local departures from a parametric model using nonparametric regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 69-84, January.
    10. Hall, Peter & Park, Byeong U., 2004. "Bandwidth choice for local polynomial estimation of smooth boundaries," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 240-261, November.
    11. J. Ojeda & J. Cristóbal & J. Alcalá, 2008. "A bootstrap approach to model checking for linear models under length-biased data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(3), pages 519-543, September.
    12. Biedermann, Stefanie & Dette, Holger, 2001. "Optimal designs for testing the functional form of a regression via nonparametric estimation techniques," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 215-224, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:417-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.