IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/svcbiz/v18y2024i3d10.1007_s11628-024-00566-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User satisfaction with the service quality of ChatGPT

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Shin Young

    (Sogang University)

  • Sang-Gun Lee

    (Sogang University)

  • Ga Youn Hong

    (Sogang University)

Abstract

The present study identified the attributes of generative AI services provided by enterprises that affect satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The KANO model was validated on the data collected from two-hundred respondents participated in the present work. The results from an KANO model analysis indicate that (1) ChatGPT’s service quality factors were categorized into the sector of must-be quality, attractive quality, and one-dimensional quality, presenting a positive image to users; and (2) service improvement efforts in attractive quality factors had strong influence on satisfaction, whereas service improvement efforts in must-be quality factors had weak influence on satisfaction. The findings from the study should be applied by companies using ChatGPT to establish effective ChatGPT utilization strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Shin Young & Sang-Gun Lee & Ga Youn Hong, 2024. "User satisfaction with the service quality of ChatGPT," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 18(3), pages 417-431, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11628-024-00566-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11628-024-00566-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11628-024-00566-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11628-024-00566-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Jungkeun & Kim, Jeong Hyun & Kim, Changju & Park, Jooyoung, 2023. "Decisions with ChatGPT: Reexamining choice overload in ChatGPT recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Ma, Xiaoyue & Huo, Yudi, 2023. "Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Chen, Qian & Gong, Yeming & Lu, Yaobin & Tang, Jing, 2022. "Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 552-568.
    4. Anton Korinek, 2023. "Generative AI for Economic Research: Use Cases and Implications for Economists," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1281-1317, December.
    5. Qian Chen & Yeming Gong & Yaobin Lu & Jing Tang, 2022. "Classifying and measuring the service quality of AI chatbot in frontline service," Post-Print hal-04325624, HAL.
    6. Koc, Erdogan & Hatipoglu, Sercan & Kivrak, Oguzhan & Celik, Cemal & Koc, Kaan, 2023. "Houston, we have a problem!: The use of ChatGPT in responding to customer complaints," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javed Ali, 2024. "Thematic Evolution of Service Quality (2011-2023): Insights for Future Research Directions ," GATR Journals jmmr341, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Xing, Yunfei & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Teng, Guangqing & Zhou, Xiaotang, 2024. "Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Choi, Sunhwa & Yi, Youjae & Zhao, Xiaohong, 2024. "The human touch vs. AI efficiency: How perceived status, effort, and loyalty shape consumer satisfaction with preferential treatment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Chen, Qian & Jing, Yufan & Gong, Yeming & Tan, Jie, 2025. "Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Ma, Liang & Yu, Peng & Zhang, Xin & Wang, Gaoshan & Hao, Feifei, 2024. "How AI use in organizations contributes to employee competitive advantage: The moderating role of perceived organization support," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Rehman, Anis ur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md. Saiful & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Assessing the usage of ChatGPT on life satisfaction among higher education students: The moderating role of subjective health," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Pinochet, Luis Hernan Contreras & de Gois, Fernanda Silva & Pardim, Vanessa Itacaramby & Onusic, Luciana Massaro, 2024. "Experimental study on the effect of adopting humanized and non-humanized chatbots on the factors measure the intensity of the user's perceived trust in the Yellow September campaign," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Ullah, Rafid & Ismail, Hishamuddin Bin & Islam Khan, Mohammad Tariqul & Zeb, Ali, 2024. "Nexus between Chat GPT usage dimensions and investment decisions making in Pakistan: Moderating role of financial literacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Kim, Myung Ja & Hall, C. Michael & Kwon, Ohbyung & Sohn, Kwonsang, 2024. "Space tourism: Value-attitude-behavior theory, artificial intelligence, and sustainability," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Manish Jha & Jialin Qian & Michael Weber & Baozhong Yang, 2024. "Harnessing Generative AI for Economic Insights," Papers 2410.03897, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    11. Cui, Yuanyuan (Gina) & van Esch, Patrick & Phelan, Steven, 2024. "How to build a competitive advantage for your brand using generative AI," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 583-594.
    12. Albanesi, Stefania & Dias da Silva, Antonio & Jimeno, Juan Francisco & Lamo, Ana & Wabitsch, Alena, 2023. "New Technologies and Jobs in Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 18220, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Heba E. Hassan, 2024. "The role of mobile shopping service quality in enhancing customers M-satisfaction, M-loyalty, and E-word of mouth," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Wagner Marco, 2024. "Künstliche Intelligenz: ChatGPT bei EZB-Prognosen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 104(9), pages 592-592.
    15. Zhou, Tao & Zhang, Chunlei, 2024. "Examining generative AI user addiction from a C-A-C perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Dong, Mengming Michael & Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. & Wang, Victor Xiaoqi, 2024. "A scoping review of ChatGPT research in accounting and finance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Guo, Wenshan & Luo, Qiangqiang, 2023. "Investigating the impact of intelligent personal assistants on the purchase intentions of Generation Z consumers: The moderating role of brand credibility," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Buchanan, Joy & Hickman, William, 2024. "Do people trust humans more than ChatGPT?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Asatryan, Zareh & Birkholz, Carlo & Heinemann, Friedrich, 2024. "Evidence-based policy or beauty contest? An LLM-based meta-analysis of EU cohesion policy evaluations," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-037, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Thiemo Fetzer & Peter John Lambert & Bennet Feld & Prashant Garg, 2024. "AI-Generated Production Networks: Measurement and Applications to Global Trade," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 346, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:18:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11628-024-00566-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.