IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/svcbiz/v19y2025i1d10.1007_s11628-025-00580-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardization versus customization in artificial intelligence-based services: what fuels continuous intention to use on digital platforms?

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Yeon Kim

    (Korea University)

  • Jin Min Kim

    (Korea University)

Abstract

This study investigates how standardization and customization influence AI service quality and their subsequent effects on user satisfaction and continuous intention to use, with a focus on AI service preference as a moderating factor. Analysis of 1032 survey responses using PLS-SEM revealed that while standardization positively affects AI service quality dimensions, customization shows a stronger positive impact. AI service satisfaction significantly influences continuous intention to use. Additionally, AI service preference demonstrates dual moderating effects: positive between AI system quality and satisfaction and negative between AI recommendation quality and satisfaction. These findings provide valuable insights for service providers seeking to enhance their market competitiveness through AI-based services.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Yeon Kim & Jin Min Kim, 2025. "Standardization versus customization in artificial intelligence-based services: what fuels continuous intention to use on digital platforms?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:19:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11628-025-00580-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11628-025-00580-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11628-025-00580-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11628-025-00580-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:svcbiz:v:19:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11628-025-00580-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.