IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v66y2025i1d10.1007_s00362-024-01635-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An unbiased rank-based estimator of the Mann–Whitney variance including the case of ties

Author

Listed:
  • Edgar Brunner

    (University Medical School)

  • Frank Konietschke

    (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin)

Abstract

Many estimators of the variance of the well-known unbiased and uniform most powerful estimator of the Mann–Whitney effect, are considered in the literature. Some of these estimators are only valid in cases of no ties or are biased in small sample sizes where the amount of bias is not discussed. Here, we derive an unbiased estimator based on different rankings, the so-called ’placements’ (Orban and Wolfe in Commun Stat Theory Methods 9:883–904, 1980), which is therefore easy to compute. This estimator does not require the assumption of continuous distribution functions and is also valid in the case of ties. Moreover, it is shown that this estimator is non-negative and has a sharp upper bound, which may be considered an empirical version of the well-known Birnbaum–Klose inequality. The derivation of this estimator provides an option to compute the biases of some commonly used estimators in the literature. Simulations demonstrate that, for small sample sizes, the biases of these estimators depend on the underlying distribution functions and thus are not under control. This means that in the case of a biased estimator, simulation results for the type-I error of a test or the coverage probability of a confidence interval do not only depend on the quality of the approximation of by a normal distribution but also an additional unknown bias caused by the variance estimator. Finally, it is shown that this estimator is $$L_2$$ L 2 -consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgar Brunner & Frank Konietschke, 2025. "An unbiased rank-based estimator of the Mann–Whitney variance including the case of ties," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01635-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-024-01635-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-024-01635-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-024-01635-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edgar Brunner & Madan Puri, 2001. "Nonparametric methods in factorial designs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friedrich, Sarah & Pauly, Markus, 2018. "MATS: Inference for potentially singular and heteroscedastic MANOVA," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 166-179.
    2. Stefano Bonnini & Getnet Melak Assegie & Kamila Trzcinska, 2024. "Review about the Permutation Approach in Hypothesis Testing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Fan, Chunpeng & Zhang, Donghui, 2014. "Wald-type rank tests: A GEE approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Denis A. Shah & Laurence V. Madden, 2013. "A comment on Mendeş and Yiğit (2013), ‘Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments’, Statistica Neerlandica, 67:1–26," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 397-399, November.
    5. Debajit Chatterjee & Uttam Bandyopadhyay, 2019. "Testing in nonparametric ANCOVA model based on ridit reliability functional," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 327-364, April.
    6. Edgar Brunner & Frank Konietschke & Arne C. Bathke & Markus Pauly, 2021. "Ranks and Pseudo‐ranks—Surprising Results of Certain Rank Tests in Unbalanced Designs," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 349-366, August.
    7. Sonja Hahn & Luigi Salmaso, 2017. "A comparison of different synchronized permutation approaches to testing effects in two-level two-factor unbalanced ANOVA designs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 123-146, March.
    8. M. Akritas & A. Stavropoulos & C. Caroni, 2009. "Asymptotic theory of weighted -statistics based on ranks," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 177-191.
    9. Friedrich, Sarah & Konietschke, Frank & Pauly, Markus, 2017. "A wild bootstrap approach for nonparametric repeated measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-52.
    10. Gunawardana, Asanka & Konietschke, Frank, 2019. "Nonparametric multiple contrast tests for general multivariate factorial designs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 165-180.
    11. Konietschke, F. & Bathke, A.C. & Hothorn, L.A. & Brunner, E., 2010. "Testing and estimation of purely nonparametric effects in repeated measures designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 1895-1905, August.
    12. Edgar Brunner & Frank Konietschke & Markus Pauly & Madan L. Puri, 2017. "Rank-based procedures in factorial designs: hypotheses about non-parametric treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1463-1485, November.
    13. Arne Bathke, 2009. "A unified approach to nonparametric trend tests for dependent and independent samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 17-29, January.
    14. Edgar Brunner & Madan L. Puri, 2013. "Comments on the paper ‘Type I error and test power of different tests for testing interaction effects in factorial experiments’ by M. Mendes and S. Yigit (Statistica Neerlandica, 2013, pp. 1–26)," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 67(4), pages 390-396, November.
    15. Dennis Dobler & Sarah Friedrich & Markus Pauly, 2020. "Nonparametric MANOVA in meaningful effects," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 997-1022, August.
    16. Bathke, Arne C. & Harrar, Solomon W. & Madden, Laurence V., 2008. "How to compare small multivariate samples using nonparametric tests," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 4951-4965, July.
    17. Jan De Neve & Olivier Thas, 2015. "A Regression Framework for Rank Tests Based on the Probabilistic Index Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1276-1283, September.
    18. Oleg Museyko & Robert Percy Marshall & Jing Lu & Andreas Hess & Georg Schett & Michael Amling & Willi A. Kalender & Klaus Engelke, 2015. "Registration of 2D histological sections with 3D micro-CT datasets from small animal vertebrae and tibiae," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(15), pages 1658-1673, November.
    19. Kandianos Emmanouil Sakalidis & Stein Gerrit Paul Menting & Florentina Johanna Hettinga, 2023. "The Role of Cognition and Social Factors in Competition: How Do People with Intellectual Disabilities Respond to Opponents?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Sattler, Paavo & Zimmermann, Georg, 2024. "Choice of the hypothesis matrix for using the Wald-type-statistic," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:66:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01635-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.