IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v65y2024i7d10.1007_s00362-024-01562-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing quantitative performance: Bayesian estimation of 3-component mixture geometric distributions based on Kumaraswamy prior

Author

Listed:
  • Nadeem Akhtar

    (Islamia College Peshawar
    Higher Education Department)

  • Sajjad Ahmad Khan

    (Islamia College Peshawar)

  • Emad A. A. Ismail

    (King Saud University)

  • Fuad A. Awwad

    (King Saud University)

  • Akbar Ali Khan

    (Higher Education Department)

  • Taza Gul

    (University of Cambridge
    City University of Science and IT)

  • Haifa Alqahtani

    (United Arab Emirates University)

Abstract

This research addresses the underutilization of discrete life testing models and proposes a Bayesian estimation strategy for a 3-component mixture of geometric distributions under a doubly type-I censoring scheme. Simpler models are less good at capturing how different processes work than more complex ones. This is because simpler models only show the lifetime distributions. This paper focuses on the examination of a 3-component mixture of geometric distributions from a Bayesian perspective. We conduct the analysis within a censored sampling environment, a commonly employed method in reliability theory and survival analysis. We derive expressions for Bayes estimators and Bayes risks under the Squared Error Loss Function (SELF), the Precautionary Loss Function (PLF), and the DeGroot Loss Function (DLF) using the Kumaraswamy prior. The process includes the elicitation of hyperparameters for the Kumaraswamy prior. Notably, the study recommends the use of the SELF for optimal estimation parameters of the 3-component mixture of geometric distributions under the doubly type-I censoring scheme. This exploration contributes to advancing the application of the Bayesian approach in discrete life testing, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field. To numerically assess the performance of Bayes estimators employing Kumaraswamy prior under different loss functions, we conducted simulations to investigate their statistical properties. This analysis involved different sample sizes and test termination times. Furthermore, to underscore the practical relevance of our findings, we present an illustrative example based on real-life data.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadeem Akhtar & Sajjad Ahmad Khan & Emad A. A. Ismail & Fuad A. Awwad & Akbar Ali Khan & Taza Gul & Haifa Alqahtani, 2024. "Analyzing quantitative performance: Bayesian estimation of 3-component mixture geometric distributions based on Kumaraswamy prior," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 4431-4451, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01562-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-024-01562-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-024-01562-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-024-01562-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chansoo Kim & Jinhyouk Jung & Younshik Chung, 2011. "Bayesian estimation for the exponentiated Weibull model under Type II progressive censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 53-70, February.
    2. Hiba Z. Muhammed & Ehab M. Almetwally, 2023. "Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Estimation for the Bivariate Inverse Weibull Distribution Under Progressive Type-II Censoring," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 481-512, April.
    3. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Kundu, Debasis, 2008. "Bayes estimators for reliability measures in geometric distribution model using masked system life test data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1821-1836, January.
    4. Indranil Ghosh & Saralees Nadarajah, 2017. "On the Bayesian inference of Kumaraswamy distributions based on censored samples," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(17), pages 8760-8777, September.
    5. Nadeem Akhtar & Sajjad Ahmad Khan & Muhammad Amin & Akbar Ali Khan & Zahra Almaspoor & Amjad Ali & Sadaf Manzoor & Tahir Mehmood, 2023. "Bayesian Estimation of a Geometric Life Testing Model under Different Loss Functions Using a Doubly Type-1Censoring Scheme," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-14, April.
    6. M. Saleem & M. Aslam & P. Economou, 2010. "On the Bayesian analysis of the mixture of power function distribution using the complete and the censored sample," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 25-40.
    7. Sultan, K.S. & Ismail, M.A. & Al-Moisheer, A.S., 2007. "Mixture of two inverse Weibull distributions: Properties and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5377-5387, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Refah Alotaibi & Mazen Nassar & Hoda Rezk & Ahmed Elshahhat, 2022. "Inferences and Engineering Applications of Alpha Power Weibull Distribution Using Progressive Type-II Censoring," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Olayan Albalawi & Naresh Chandra Kabdwal & Qazi J. Azhad & Rashi Hora & Basim S. O. Alsaedi, 2022. "Estimation of the Generalized Logarithmic Transformation Exponential Distribution under Progressively Type-II Censored Data with Application to the COVID-19 Mortality Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. K. Sultan & A. Al-Moisheer, 2013. "Updating a nonlinear discriminant function estimated from a mixture of two inverse Weibull distributions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 163-175, February.
    4. Neha Goel & Hare Krishna, 2022. "Different methods of estimation in two parameter Geometric distribution with randomly censored data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1652-1665, August.
    5. A. Sikov & J. M. Stern, 2019. "Application of the full Bayesian significance test to model selection under informative sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 89-104, February.
    6. Tian, Yuzhu & Zhu, Qianqian & Tian, Maozai, 2015. "Estimation for mixed exponential distributions under type-II progressively hybrid censored samples," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 85-96.
    7. Chang, Yiming & Tao, YinYing & Shan, Wei & Yu, Xiangyuan, 2023. "Forecasting COVID-19 new cases through the Mixed Generalized Inverse Weibull Distribution and time series model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P2).
    8. Rashad M. EL-Sagheer, 2018. "Estimation of parameters of Weibull–Gamma distribution based on progressively censored data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 725-757, June.
    9. Tzong-Ru Tsai & Yuhlong Lio & Wei-Chen Ting, 2021. "EM Algorithm for Mixture Distributions Model with Type-I Hybrid Censoring Scheme," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Fu, Jiayu & Xu, Ancha & Tang, Yincai, 2012. "Objective Bayesian analysis of Pareto distribution under progressive Type-II censoring," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1829-1836.
    11. Wang, Lichun, 2019. "Computing the estimator of a parameter vector via a competing Bayes method," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 271-279.
    12. Xuehua Hu & Wenhao Gui, 2018. "Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Inference for the Generalized Pareto Distribution Based on Progressive Type II Censored Sample," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Almalki, Saad J. & Nadarajah, Saralees, 2014. "Modifications of the Weibull distribution: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 32-55.
    14. Saralees Nadarajah & Gauss Cordeiro & Edwin Ortega, 2013. "The exponentiated Weibull distribution: a survey," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 839-877, August.
    15. Saieed Ateya, 2014. "Maximum likelihood estimation under a finite mixture of generalized exponential distributions based on censored data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 311-325, May.
    16. Kim, Jin Seon & Yum, Bong-Jin, 2008. "Selection between Weibull and lognormal distributions: A comparative simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 477-485, December.
    17. Ruhul Ali Khan & Murari Mitra, 2021. "Estimation issues in the Exponential–Logarithmic model under hybrid censoring," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 419-450, February.
    18. Ehab M. Almetwally & Aisha Fayomi & Maha E. Qura, 2024. "Advanced Copula-Based Models for Type II Censored Data: Applications in Industrial and Medical Settings," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-35, June.
    19. Kotb, M.S. & Raqab, M.Z., 2019. "Statistical inference for modified Weibull distribution based on progressively type-II censored data," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 233-248.
    20. Felipe Gusmão & Edwin Ortega & Gauss Cordeiro, 2011. "The generalized inverse Weibull distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 591-619, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:65:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s00362-024-01562-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.