IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v62y2021i5d10.1007_s00362-020-01190-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection and integration of generalized instrumental variables for estimating total effects

Author

Listed:
  • Ryusei Shingaki

    (Yokohama National University)

  • Hiroshi Kanda

    (Yokohama National University)

  • Manabu Kuroki

    (Yokohama National University)

Abstract

We consider a situation where cause–effect relationships between variables can be described as a directed acyclic graph (DAG) and the corresponding linear structural equation model (linear SEM). When several pairs of instrumental variables (IVs) and covariates (IV-pairs; Pearl in: Proceedings of the 20th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, AUAI Press, Arlington, Virginia, United States, UAI’04, 2004) are available, we propose (i) the graphical selection criteria of IV-pairs for total effects and (ii) an integrated estimator that combines them to estimate total effects with better accuracy. In this paper, in accordance with the paper by Brito and Pearl (in: Proceedings of the 18th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, UAI’02, 2002), the proposed estimator is called an integrated generalized instrumental variable (iGIV) estimator. The proposed graphical selection criteria imply that (a) the back-door criterion achieves better estimation accuracy than the traditional instrumental variable (IV) method of estimating total effects even when the treatment and covariates are highly correlated and (b) the conditional IV method can be superior to the back-door criterion in some situations. The iGIV estimator provides a general class that includes both the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator based on the back-door criterion and the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator based on the (conditional) IV method. We clarify the properties of the iGIV estimator, some of which can be read off from the DAG structure. Furthermore, through numerical experiments and an application to a case study, we show that the performance of the iGIV estimator is superior to those of the OLS and IV estimators. The iGIV estimator can be a powerful tool to estimate the total effect when the proposed graphical selection criteria of the IV-pairs are not satisfied.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryusei Shingaki & Hiroshi Kanda & Manabu Kuroki, 2021. "Selection and integration of generalized instrumental variables for estimating total effects," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2355-2381, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-020-01190-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-020-01190-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-020-01190-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-020-01190-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruud, Paul A., 2000. "An Introduction to Classical Econometric Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195111644, Decembrie.
    2. Paul Bekker & Jan Leeuw, 1987. "The rank of reduced dispersion matrices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 125-135, March.
    3. Manabu Kuroki & Zhihong Cai, 2006. "On recovering a population covariance matrix in the presence of selection bias," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 601-611, September.
    4. Manabu Kuroki & Masami Miyakawa, 2003. "Covariate selection for estimating the causal effect of control plans by using causal diagrams," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 209-222, February.
    5. Hansen, Christian & Hausman, Jerry & Newey, Whitney, 2008. "Estimation With Many Instrumental Variables," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 398-422.
    6. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1993. "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195060119, Decembrie.
    7. Elena Stanghellini & Eduwin Pakpahan, 2015. "Identification of causal effects in linear models: beyond instrumental variables," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 489-509, September.
    8. Manabu Kuroki & Judea Pearl, 2014. "Measurement bias and effect restoration in causal inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(2), pages 423-437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manabu Kuroki & Hisayoshi Nanmo, 2020. "Variance formulas for estimated mean response and predicted response with external intervention based on the back-door criterion in linear structural equation models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 667-685, December.
    2. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2020. "Exogeneity tests, incomplete models, weak identification and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 390-418.
    3. Frank Windmeijer & Helmut Farbmacher & Neil Davies & George Davey Smith, 2019. "On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(527), pages 1339-1350, July.
    4. Herrera Gómez, Marcos & Cid, Juan Carlos & Paz, Jorge Augusto, 2012. "Introducción a la econometría espacial: Una aplicación al estudio de la fecundidad en la Argentina usando R [Introduction to Spatial Econometrics: An application to the study of fertility in Argent," MPRA Paper 41138, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Michal Kolesár & Raj Chetty & John Friedman & Edward Glaeser & Guido W. Imbens, 2015. "Identification and Inference With Many Invalid Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 474-484, October.
    6. Olivier Donni & Nicolas Moreau, 2007. "Collective Labor Supply: A Single-Equation Model and Some Evidence from French Data," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 42(1).
    7. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin, 2012. "Specification tests with weak and invalid instruments," Working Papers 15063, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, revised 26 Jun 2012.
    8. Peter Ebbes & Ulf Böckenholt & Michel Wedel, 2004. "Regressor and random‐effects dependencies in multilevel models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 58(2), pages 161-178, May.
    9. Sanjay Chaudhuri, 2014. "Qualitative inequalities for squared partial correlations of a Gaussian random vector," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(2), pages 345-367, April.
    10. Lung-fei Lee & Jihai Yu, 2012. "The C(α)-type gradient test for spatial dependence in spatial autoregressive models," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 119-135, October.
    11. Keita, Moussa, 2015. "Introduction à l'Econométrie [Introduction to Econometrics]," MPRA Paper 66840, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Parente, Paulo M.D.C. & Smith, Richard J., 2017. "Tests of additional conditional moment restrictions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-16.
    13. Möhring, Niklas & Dalhaus, Tobias & Enjolras, Geoffroy & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Christopher F Baum & Mark E. Schaffer & Steven Stillman, 2003. "Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, March.
    15. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic Data," MPRA Paper 106408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Firmin Doko Tchatoka & Jean-Marie Dufour, 2016. "Exogeneity tests, weak identification, incomplete models and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2016-01, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    17. Guy Tchuente, 2019. "Weak Identification and Estimation of Social Interaction Models," Papers 1902.06143, arXiv.org.
    18. Peter Ebbes, 2007. "A non-technical guide to instrumental variables and regressor-error dependencies (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 2, pages 3-20, March.
    19. J. Hirschberg & J. Lye & D.J. Slottje, 2005. "Alernative Forms for Restricted Regressions," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 954, The University of Melbourne.
    20. Nanmo, Hisayoshi & Kuroki, Manabu, 2021. "Exact variance formula for the estimated mean outcome with external intervention based on the front-door criterion in Gaussian linear structural equation models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s00362-020-01190-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.