IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v31y2022i2d10.1007_s10260-021-00570-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of refraction prediction error after cataract surgery: a shared parameter model to account for missing post-operative measurements

Author

Listed:
  • D. Claire Miller

    (Colorado School of Public Health
    University of Colorado School of Medicine)

  • Samantha MaWhinney

    (Colorado School of Public Health)

  • Jennifer L. Patnaik

    (University of Colorado School of Medicine)

  • Karen L. Christopher

    (University of Colorado School of Medicine)

  • Anne M. Lynch

    (University of Colorado School of Medicine)

  • Brandie D. Wagner

    (Colorado School of Public Health
    University of Colorado School of Medicine)

Abstract

Cataract surgery is a common procedure that involves removing the cataractous lens of the eye and implanting a new clear plastic lens, with a goal of improving vision and often changing the refraction of the eye. Unexpected refractive outcomes, or refraction prediction error (PE), may be more likely to occur among patients with certain preexisting ocular conditions. However, longitudinal refractive measurements are often missing after surgery, making it difficult to accurately assess which ocular comorbidities lead to increased PE. Moreover, patients with ideal refractive outcomes in one or both eyes may be less likely to return to the clinic, thus more likely to have missing measurements that are missing not at random (MNAR). Despite this potential complication to data analysis, very few studies evaluating PE address the missing data mechanism and the effect it may have on the results. We propose the application of a shared parameter model to reduce bias in situations of MNAR data and compare this to a linear mixed model that is not able to account for this mechanism. We also conduct a simulation study to better understand the most plausible missing mechanism in our study and to characterize situations in which the shared parameter model may be necessary. Applied to the cataract surgery data, the shared parameter model gives similar results as the linear mixed model, finding that a history of LASIK, PRK, RK, high myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, or combined surgery lead to increased PE. In addition, the simulations confirm that under certain scenarios, a shared parameter model will greatly reduce bias in situations of MNAR.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Claire Miller & Samantha MaWhinney & Jennifer L. Patnaik & Karen L. Christopher & Anne M. Lynch & Brandie D. Wagner, 2022. "Predictors of refraction prediction error after cataract surgery: a shared parameter model to account for missing post-operative measurements," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-021-00570-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-021-00570-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-021-00570-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-021-00570-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christos Thomadakis & Loukia Meligkotsidou & Nikos Pantazis & Giota Touloumi, 2019. "Longitudinal and time‐to‐drop‐out joint models can lead to seriously biased estimates when the drop‐out mechanism is at random," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 58-68, March.
    2. Roula Tsonaka & Dimitris Rizopoulos & Geert Verbeke & Emmanuel Lesaffre, 2010. "Nonignorable Models for Intermittently Missing Categorical Longitudinal Responses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 834-844, September.
    3. Joseph Ibrahim & Geert Molenberghs, 2009. "Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: a review," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 1-43, May.
    4. Joseph Ibrahim & Geert Molenberghs, 2009. "Rejoinder on: Missing data methods in longitudinal studies: a review," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 18(1), pages 68-75, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wan-Lun Wang, 2019. "Mixture of multivariate t nonlinear mixed models for multiple longitudinal data with heterogeneity and missing values," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 196-222, March.
    2. Zhou, Jing & Lan, Wei & Wang, Hansheng, 2022. "Asymptotic covariance estimation by Gaussian random perturbation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Maria Gheorghe & Susan Picavet & Monique Verschuren & Werner B. F. Brouwer & Pieter H. M. Baal, 2017. "Health losses at the end of life: a Bayesian mixed beta regression approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 723-749, June.
    4. Cai, T. Tony & Zhang, Anru, 2016. "Minimax rate-optimal estimation of high-dimensional covariance matrices with incomplete data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 55-74.
    5. Jouni Kuha & Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2018. "Latent variable modelling with non‐ignorable item non‐response: multigroup response propensity models for cross‐national analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1169-1192, October.
    6. Li, Chao & Sun, Daoming, 2023. "Women’s bargaining power and spending on children’s education: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Francesco Bravo, 2020. "Robust estimation and inference for general varying coefficient models with missing observations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(4), pages 966-988, December.
    8. Li, Chao & Zhang, Yuhan & Li, Xiang & Hao, Yanwei, 2024. "Artificial intelligence, household financial fragility and energy resources consumption: Impacts of digital disruption from a demand-based perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Tithi Biswas & Kylie H. Kang & Rohin Gawdi & David Bajor & Mitchell Machtay & Charu Jindal & Jimmy T. Efird, 2020. "Using the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) as a Mid-Treatment Marker for Survival among Patients with Stage-III Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Weiping Zhang & Feiyue Xie & Jiaxin Tan, 2020. "A robust joint modeling approach for longitudinal data with informative dropouts," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1759-1783, December.
    11. An-Min Tang & Nian-Sheng Tang & Dalei Yu, 2023. "Bayesian semiparametric joint model of multivariate longitudinal and survival data with dependent censoring," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 888-918, October.
    12. Nanhua Zhang & Henian Chen & Yuanshu Zou, 2014. "A joint model of binary and longitudinal data with non-ignorable missingness, with application to marital stress and late-life major depression in women," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 1028-1039, May.
    13. Daniel O. Scharfstein & Jon Steingrimsson & Aidan McDermott & Chenguang Wang & Souvik Ray & Aimee Campbell & Edward Nunes & Abigail Matthews, 2022. "Global sensitivity analysis of randomized trials with nonmonotone missing binary outcomes: Application to studies of substance use disorders," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 649-659, June.
    14. Antonello Maruotti, 2015. "Handling non-ignorable dropouts in longitudinal data: a conditional model based on a latent Markov heterogeneity structure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(1), pages 84-109, March.
    15. Li, Xiaofei & Huebner, E. Scott & Tian, Lili, 2021. "Vicious cycle of emotional maltreatment and bullying perpetration/victimization among early adolescents: Depressive symptoms as a mediator," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    16. Yuriko Takeda & Toshihiro Misumi & Kouji Yamamoto, 2022. "Joint Models for Incomplete Longitudinal Data and Time-to-Event Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-7, October.
    17. Edward F. Vonesh & Tom Greene, 2022. "Biased estimation with shared parameter models in the presence of competing dropout mechanisms," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 399-406, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-021-00570-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.