IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v14y2022i2d10.1007_s12571-021-01226-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of climate change on the yield of tropical root and tuber crops vs. rice and potato in India

Author

Listed:
  • Raji Pushpalatha

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • VS Santhosh Mithra

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • S Sunitha

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • James Goerge

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • M Nedunchezhiyan

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • K Mamatha

    (Dr. YSR Horticultural University)

  • P Ashok

    (Dr. YSR Horticultural University)

  • Sheriful Alam

    (Assam Agricultural University)

  • BK Saud

    (Assam Agricultural University)

  • J Tarafdar

    (Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya)

  • Surajit Mitra

    (Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya)

  • Chandra Deo

    (College of Horticulture and Forestry)

  • M Velmurugan

    (Tropica and Castor Research Station)

  • G Suja

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • V Ravi

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

  • Byju Gangadharan

    (ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute)

Abstract

The current study focused on the impact of climate change on tropical root and tuber crops of India over some of the major growing areas using the crop model, WOFOST. As part of this study, the impact of climate change on the yield of rice and potato is also carried out using the same crop model to understand the advantages of root and tuber crops over the yield variations of rice and potato. The LARS weather generator is used to derive future climate for 2030, 2050, and 2070 for the two representative concentration pathways (RCPs)-4.5 and 8.5. The future climate projections in the study locations indicate an increment in minimum and maximum temperatures up to a value of 3.4 and 3.8 ºC respectively. The rainfall also indicates a drastic fluctuation from -721 to 448 mm in the future. The results reveal that the predicted crop yield varies from one location to another depending on the future climate. Cassava (-13 to 12%, -17 to 8%), sweet potato (-32 to 14%, -38 to 13%), greater yam (-11 to 8, -14 to 6), elephant foot yam (-10 to 6, -12 to 4), and taro (-16 to 19, -28 to 18) can be considered as future crops based on their predicted yield variations and economics compared to that of rice (-26 to 15%, -50 to 18%) and potato (-37 to 7%, -59 to 8.5%) for both the RCPs. Among other crops, sweet potato has the same crop duration as rice and potato and can be recommended to increase food access. These crops can be recommended for enhancing the availability of food based on their superiority in dry matter production.

Suggested Citation

  • Raji Pushpalatha & VS Santhosh Mithra & S Sunitha & James Goerge & M Nedunchezhiyan & K Mamatha & P Ashok & Sheriful Alam & BK Saud & J Tarafdar & Surajit Mitra & Chandra Deo & M Velmurugan & G Suja &, 2022. "Impact of climate change on the yield of tropical root and tuber crops vs. rice and potato in India," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 495-508, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01226-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01226-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-021-01226-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-021-01226-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siwabhorn Pipitpukdee & Witsanu Attavanich & Somskaow Bejranonda, 2020. "Impact of Climate Change on Land Use, Yield and Production of Cassava in Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Cynthia W. Angba & Richard N. Baines & Allan J. Butler, 2020. "Examining Yam Production in Response to Climate Change in Nigeria: A Co-Integration Model Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Bradbury, J. Howard & Holloway, Warren D., 1988. "Chemistry of Tropical Root Crops: Significance for Nutrition and Agriculture in the Pacific," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 118050.
    4. Akinola, A.A. & Oke, J.T.O. & Adesiyan, A.T. & Famuyini, C.A., 2019. "Climate Change and Economic Efficiency of Yam Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria," 2019 Sixth International Conference, September 23-26, 2019, Abuja, Nigeria 295835, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel Henrique Olanda Souza & Lucas Eduardo Oliveira Aparecido & José Reinaldo da Silva Cabral Moraes & Guilherme Torsoni Botega, 2023. "Climate change and its influence on planting of cassava in the Midwest region of Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1184-1204, February.
    2. Aditya Parmar & Barbara Sturm & Oliver Hensel, 2017. "Crops that feed the world: Production and improvement of cassava for food, feed, and industrial uses," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 907-927, October.
    3. Adejo, S. A. & Amos, T. T. & Awolala, D. O., 2024. "Determinants of Vulnerability to Climate Change among Yam Farmers in Benue and Nasarawa States," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(7), pages 230-242, July.
    4. Cornelius B. Mushumbusi & Robert A. Max & Gaymary G. Bakari & James R. Mushi & Sakurani T. Balthazary, 2020. "Cyanide in Cassava Varieties and People’s Perception on Cyanide Poisoning in Selected Regions of Tanzania," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(1), pages 180-193, March.
    5. Timothy L. M. Sharp & Mark Busse & R. Michael Bourke, 2022. "Market update: Sixty years of change in Papua New Guineaʼs fresh food marketplaces," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 483-515, September.
    6. O'Sullivan, J.N. & Asher, Colin J. & Blarney, F.P.C., 1997. "Nutrient Disorders of Sweet Potato," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 117165.
    7. Edwen D. Waas & Sheny S. Kaihatu & Marthen P. Sirappa, 2020. "Tillage Systems and Fertilization for Increase of Yam’s Local Tuber (Dioscorea esculenta) on Farming System at Moluccas," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(4), pages 469-481, December.
    8. Carla Barlagne & Denis Cornet & Jean-Marc Blazy & Jean-Louis Diman & Harry Ozier-Lafontaine, 2017. "Consumers' preferences for fresh yam: a focus group study," Post-Print hal-02622383, HAL.
    9. Oluwatoyin Ayetigbo & Sajid Latif & Adebayo Abass & Joachim Müller, 2018. "Comparing Characteristics of Root, Flour and Starch of Biofortified Yellow-Flesh and White-Flesh Cassava Variants, and Sustainability Considerations: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-32, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01226-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.