IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v14y2022i1d10.1007_s12571-021-01205-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Oosting

    (Wageningen University & Research)

  • Jan Lee

    (Wageningen University & Research)

  • Marc Verdegem

    (Wageningen University & Research)

  • Marion Vries

    (Wageningen University & Research)

  • Adriaan Vernooij

    (Wageningen University & Research)

  • Camila Bonilla-Cedrez

    (The Alliance of International Biodiversity and CIAT)

  • Kazi Kabir

    (Wageningen University & Research
    CIRAD)

Abstract

In the discourse about the development of farmed animal production (terrestrial livestock production and aquaculture) in the tropics, two important food system outcomes emerge: (1) to supply animal-sourced food (ASF) at a level that suffices healthy future diets, including for poor people, and (2) to contribute to climate change mitigation and minimize pollution with nitrogen and phosphorus. Livestock production and aquaculture contribute to food security directly by increasing producers’ food diversity and availability, but also that of urban consumers, and indirectly through income generation and increased farm resilience. Recently, circularity has come to the fore as an integrated approach to food system development. Circularity has four cornerstones: (1) food crops have highest priority (which implies no food-feed competition), (2) avoid losses, (3) recycle waste and (4) use animals to unlock biomass that humans cannot eat. In this review, the role of farmed animals in circular food systems in the tropics is presented in four case studies and the impacts of circularity on food security and environmental impact mitigation are discussed. The cases are ruminants in grazing systems in West Africa and in Colombia, fish in pond aquaculture in general, and land-limited dairy production in Indonesia. Additionally, options for novel protein sources for use in livestock and fish feeding are presented. It is concluded that farmed animals are important in circular food systems because of their use of land unsuited for crop production, their upgrading of crop residues, and their supply of manure to crop production. Nevertheless, the increasing demand for ASF puts pressure on important characteristics of circularity, such as minimizing food-feed competition, maximization of use of waste streams in feed, and the value of manure for fertilization. Hence, in line with conclusions for Western countries, maximum circularity and sustainability of food systems can only be achieved by optimizing the population size of animals. Thus, a sustainable contribution of ASF production to global food security is complex and in not only a technical matter or outcome of an economic process balancing supply and demand. It requires governance for which public, private, and social actors need to partner.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Oosting & Jan Lee & Marc Verdegem & Marion Vries & Adriaan Vernooij & Camila Bonilla-Cedrez & Kazi Kabir, 2022. "Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(1), pages 273-292, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01205-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01205-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-021-01205-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-021-01205-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Badrun Nessa Ahmed & Hermann Waibel, 2019. "The role of homestead fish ponds for household nutrition security in Bangladesh," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(4), pages 835-854, August.
    2. Mamun-Ur-Rashid, M. & Belton, B. & Phillips, M. & Rosentrater, K.A., 2013. "Improving aquaculture feed in Bangladesh: From feed ingredients to farmer profit to safe consumption," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40218, April.
    3. Jan Van der Lee & Laurens Klerkx & Bockline Omedo Bebe & Ashenafi Mengistu & Simon Oosting, 2018. "Intensification and Upgrading Dynamics in Emerging Dairy Clusters in the East African Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Sarah A. Castine & Jessica R. Bogard & Benoy K. Barman & Manjurul Karim & Md. Mokarrom Hossain & Mrityunjoy Kunda & A. B. M. Mahfuzul Haque & Michael J. Phillips & Shakuntala H. Thilsted, 2017. "Homestead pond polyculture can improve access to nutritious small fish," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(4), pages 785-801, August.
    5. A. Parodi & A. Leip & I. J. M. Boer & P. M. Slegers & F. Ziegler & E. H. M. Temme & M. Herrero & H. Tuomisto & H. Valin & C. E. Middelaar & J. J. A. Loon & H. H. E. Zanten, 2019. "Author Correction: The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 342-347, April.
    6. Moll, Henk A.J. & Staal, Steven J. & Ibrahim, M.N.M., 2007. "Smallholder dairy production and markets: A comparison of production systems in Zambia, Kenya and Sri Lanka," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 593-603, May.
    7. Irene Rumbidzai Mazhangara & Eliton Chivandi & John Fisher Mupangwa & Voster Muchenje, 2019. "The Potential of Goat Meat in the Red Meat Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Rosamond L. Naylor & Ronald W. Hardy & Alejandro H. Buschmann & Simon R. Bush & Ling Cao & Dane H. Klinger & David C. Little & Jane Lubchenco & Sandra E. Shumway & Max Troell, 2021. "A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 591(7851), pages 551-563, March.
    9. Assem Abu Hatab & Maria Eduarda Rigo Cavinato & Carl Johan Lagerkvist, 2019. "Urbanization, livestock systems and food security in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(2), pages 279-299, April.
    10. Sankoh, S. & Teoh, S.J. & Phillips, M.J. & Siriwardena, S.N., 2018. "Sierra Leone aquaculture assessment with special emphasis on Tonkolili and Bombali districts," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40755, April.
    11. Toufique, Kazi Ali & Belton, Ben, 2014. "Is Aquaculture Pro-Poor? Empirical Evidence of Impacts on Fish Consumption in Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 609-620.
    12. Yamamoto, Wataru & Dewi, Ioan Ap & Ibrahim, Muhammad, 2007. "Effects of silvopastoral areas on milk production at dual-purpose cattle farms at the semi-humid old agricultural frontier in central Nicaragua," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 368-375, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pradeleix, L. & Roux, P. & Bouarfa, S. & Bellon-Maurel, V., 2023. "Multilevel life cycle assessment to evaluate prospective agricultural development scenarios in a semi-arid irrigated region of Tunisia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Alvarez-Rodriguez, Javier & Ryschawy, Julie & Grillot, Myriam & Martin, Guillaume, 2024. "Circularity and livestock diversity: Pathways to sustainability in intensive pig farming regions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Mauricio Vélez-Terranova & Arcesio Salamanca-Carreño & Oscar Mauricio Vargas-Corzo & Pere M. Parés-Casanova & Otoniel Pérez-López, 2023. "Influence of Cutting Intervals and Transition Periods on Chemical Composition Variability of Selected Tropical Grasses under Flooded Savanna Conditions of Arauca, Colombian Orinoquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lipper, Leslie & Cavatassi, Romina & Symons, Ricci & Gordes, Alashiya & Page, Oliver, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 85: Financing climate adaptation and resilient agricultural livelihoods," IFAD Research Series 322020, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    2. Oosting, Simon & van der Lee, Jan & Verdegem, Marc & de Vries, Marion & Vernooij, Adriaan & Bonilla-Cedrez, Camila & Kabir, Kazi, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 84: Farmed animal production in tropical circular food systems," IFAD Research Series 322018, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    3. Belton, Ben & Hein, Aung & Htoo, Kyan & Kham, L. Seng & Nischan, Ulrike & Reardon, Thomas & Boughton, Duncan, 2015. "• Aquaculture in Transition: Value Chain Transformation, Fish and Food Security in Myanmar," Food Security International Development Working Papers 230981, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    4. Amelie Bernzen & Ellen Mangnus & Franziska Sohns, 2022. "Diversify, produce or buy? An analysis of factors contributing to household dietary diversity among shrimp and non-shrimp farmers in coastal Bangladesh," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 741-761, June.
    5. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. van der Lee, Jan & Oosting, Simon & Klerkx, Laurens & Opinya, Felix & Bebe, Bockline Omedo, 2020. "Effects of proximity to markets on dairy farming intensity and market participation in Kenya and Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Constanza Gonzalez Parrao & Shannon Shisler & Marta Moratti & Cem Yavuz & Arnab Acharya & John Eyers & Birte Snilstveit, 2021. "Aquaculture for improving productivity, income, nutrition and women's empowerment in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    8. Belton, Ben & Hein, Aung & Htoo, Kyan & Kham, L. Seng & Nischan, Ulrike & Reardon, Thomas & Boughton, Duncan, 2015. "Aquaculture In Transition: Value Chain Transformation, Fish And Food Security In Myanmar," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259027, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    9. Khor, Ling Yee & Tran, Nhuong & Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia & Campos, Natalia & Zeller, Manfred, 2022. "Economic and productivity performance of tilapia and rohu carp polyculture systems in Bangladesh, Egypt, and Myanmar," SocArXiv bwmq4, Center for Open Science.
    10. Daykin Harohau & Jessica Blythe & Marcus Sheaves & Amy Diedrich, 2020. "Limits of Tilapia Aquaculture for Rural Livelihoods in Solomon Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Sean Irwin & Mark S. Flaherty & Joachim Carolsfeld, 2021. "The contribution of small-scale, privately owned tropical aquaculture to food security and dietary diversity in Bolivia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(1), pages 199-218, February.
    12. Thilsted, Shakuntala Haraksingh & Thorne-Lyman, Andrew & Webb, Patrick & Bogard, Jessica Rose & Subasinghe, Rohana & Phillips, Michael John & Allison, Edward Hugh, 2016. "Sustaining healthy diets: The role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 126-131.
    13. Alobo Loison, Sarah & Hillbom, Ellen, 2020. "Regional evidence of smallholder-based growth in Zambia’s livestock sector," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    14. Christopher Shaw & Klaus Knopf & Werner Kloas, 2022. "Toward Feeds for Circular Multitrophic Food Production Systems: Holistically Evaluating Growth Performance and Nutrient Excretion of African Catfish Fed Fish Meal-Free Diets in Comparison to Nile Tila," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, November.
    15. Rumana Akter & Shakuntala H. Thilsted & Nazia Hossain & Hiroe Ishihara & Nobuyuki Yagi, 2019. "Fish is the Preferred Animal-Source Food in the Rural Community of Southern Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Abid Hussain & Gopal Bahadur Thapa, 2016. "Fungibility of Smallholder Agricultural Credit: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(5), pages 826-846, November.
    17. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2022. "The direct and lag effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion patterns in Chinese mega-urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Rajts, F. & Shelley, C.C., 2020. "Mola (Amblypharyngodon mola) aquaculture in Bangladesh: Status and future needs," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 40908, April.
    19. Raza Ullah & Ganesh P. Shivakoti & Farhad Zulfiqar & Muhammad Nadeem Iqbal & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah, 2017. "Disaster risk management in agriculture: tragedies of the smallholders," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1361-1375, July.
    20. Katherine Elizabeth Drury & Felicity Victoria Crotty, 2022. "Developing the Use of Wool Rope within Aquaculture—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01205-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.