IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v149y2020i1d10.1007_s11205-019-02234-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Quality of Urban Development Plans Promoted by the European Union: The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)

Author

Listed:
  • Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez

    (Pablo de Olavide University)

  • María-Jesús Rodríguez-García

    (Pablo de Olavide University)

  • María José Guerrero-Mayo

    (Pablo de Olavide University)

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the European Union has launched different programs to promote urban development plans. Implementation and outcomes evaluations have resulted in a “European urban acquis” concerning the importance of comprehensiveness, collaborative governance, and participation to promote “good plans.” However, the evaluation of the quality of local plans, has received less attention. This article analyses quality of local plans developed under the framework of European Policies in Spain applying the plan quality evaluation approach, as well as factors explaining quality levels of these local plans. A scale to measure plan quality is proposed based on five main dimensions (fact base, objectives, policy actions, plan governance, evaluation). 64 local plans are analyzed applying content analysis. RgW and AD tests are used to measure codification reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is used to assess the validity of plan quality scale. Lineal regression is applied to analyze the impact of different aspects of planning process included in the ‘European urban acquis’ on plan quality. Main results show that CFA validates the scale proposed to measure local plan quality as a second-order factor; and point out objectives and policy actions as the most important first-order factors. Public participation during planning process, and more comprehensive plan across different policy areas, are the main factors explaining ‘good plans’. Therefore, the importance of the ‘European urban acquis,’ is confirmed in order to produce ‘good’ urban development plans; and the article provides a validated scale to evaluate the quality of urban development plans, and their main dimensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez & María-Jesús Rodríguez-García & María José Guerrero-Mayo, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Urban Development Plans Promoted by the European Union: The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 215-237, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:149:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-019-02234-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02234-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-019-02234-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-019-02234-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thiemo Eser & Eva Nussmueller, 2006. "Mid-term evaluations of Community Initiatives under European Union Structural Funds: A process between accounting and common learning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 249-258.
    2. Lindsey Ward Lyles & Philip Berke & Gavin Smith, 2014. "Do planners matter? Examining factors driving incorporation of land use approaches into hazard mitigation plans," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 792-811, May.
    3. Philip Berke & John Cooper & Meghan Aminto & Shannon Grabich & Jennifer Horney, 2014. "Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(4), pages 310-323, October.
    4. Sophie C. Rudolf & Simona R. Grădinaru & Anna M. Hersperger, 2017. "Impact of planning mandates on local plans: a multi-method assessment," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2192-2211, December.
    5. Dave Guyadeen, 2018. "Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights From a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 21-32, January.
    6. Satorra, Albert & Bentler, Peter M., 1990. "Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 235-249, December.
    7. Gene Bunnell & Edward Jepson, 2011. "The Effect of Mandated Planning on Plan Quality," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 338-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aparna Kumari & Tim G. Frazier, 2021. "Evaluating social capital in emergency and disaster management and hazards plans," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 949-973, October.
    2. Guyadeen, Dave & Henstra, Daniel & Kaup, Shivani & Wright, Grace, 2023. "Evaluating the quality of municipal strategic plans," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Norton, Richard K. & David, Nina P. & Buckman, Stephen & Koman, Patricia D., 2018. "Overlooking the coast: Limited local planning for coastal area management along Michigan’s Great Lakes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 183-203.
    4. Qiao Hu & Zhenghong Tang & Martha Shulski & Natalie Umphlett & Tarik Abdel-Monem & Frank E. Uhlarik, 2018. "An examination of midwestern US cities’ preparedness for climate change and extreme hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 777-800, November.
    5. Lei He & Ziang Xie & Yi Peng & Yan Song & Shenzhi Dai, 2019. "How Can Post-Disaster Recovery Plans Be Improved Based on Historical Learning? A Comparison of Wenchuan Earthquake and Lushan Earthquake Recovery Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Dave Guyadeen & Jason Thistlethwaite & Daniel Henstra, 2019. "Evaluating the quality of municipal climate change plans in Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 121-143, January.
    7. Ventura, Eva & Satorra, Albert, 2015. "A multiple indicator model for panel data: an application to ICT area-level variation," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Albert Satorra, 1989. "Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 131-151, March.
    9. Ke-Hai Yuan & Yubin Tian & Hirokazu Yanagihara, 2015. "Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 379-405, June.
    10. Haj-Salem, Narjes & Chebat, Jean Charles & Michon, Richard & Oliveira, Sandra, 2016. "Why male and female shoppers do not see mall loyalty through the same lens? The mediating role of self-congruity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1219-1227.
    11. Qiuqin Zhang & Tianzhu Zhang & Xiang Liu, 2018. "Index System to Evaluate the Quarries Ecological Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Kano, Yutaka & Takai, Keiji, 2011. "Analysis of NMAR missing data without specifying missing-data mechanisms in a linear latent variate model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(9), pages 1241-1255, October.
    13. Shin Tu & Siyu Yu, 2023. "Urban Planning for Climate Change: Comparing Climate Adaptation Plans between Taipei and Boston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Richard L. Dukes & Jodie B . Ullman & Judith A. Stein, 1996. "Three-Year Follow-Up of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 20(1), pages 49-66, February.
    15. Haruhiko Ogasawara, 2004. "Asymptotic biases in exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 235-256, June.
    16. Willem Saris & Harm Hartman, 1990. "Common factors can always be found but can they also be rejected?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 471-490, November.
    17. Albert Satorra, 1990. "Robustness issues in structural equation modeling: a review of recent developments," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 367-386, November.
    18. Gülhayat Şimşek & Fatma Noyan, 2012. "Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables: a large sample case study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1571-1581, August.
    19. Christine Quattro & Thomas Daniels, 2022. "The Constellation of Plans: Toward a New Structure of Comprehensive Plans in US Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Reckien, Diana & Buzasi, Attila & Olazabal, Marta & Spyridaki, Niki-Artemis & Eckersley, Peter & Simoes, Sofia G. & Salvia, Monica & Pietrapertosa, Filomena & Fokaides, Paris & Goonesekera, Sascha M. , 2023. "Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:149:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-019-02234-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.