IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i3p619-d133805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Index System to Evaluate the Quarries Ecological Restoration

Author

Listed:
  • Qiuqin Zhang

    (School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Tianzhu Zhang

    (School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Xiang Liu

    (School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

The restoration and evaluation of degraded ecosystems is an important component of the sustainable development of complex “human-natural-economic” ecosystems. Based on an analysis of ecosystem evolution and the integration of structure, function, and services, this study proposes that ecosystems can be returned to a self-maintaining, dynamic balance by enriching system elements, strengthening the relationships between the different elements and diverse ecological processes, and restoring internal functions, which includes the self-regulation of degraded ecosystems. This study developed and categorized quarry ecosystem recovery indicators based on the Core Capabilities of the Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) International through literature review and the development of recovery plans. Metrics identified in the literature were validated through the recovery plan review and the case study, and based on the findings, a user-friendly checklist for practitioners was established. Three elements and 17 indicators representing ecological processes, vegetation structures, and ecological functions were developed to evaluate and manage the ecological restoration of an abandoned quarry.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiuqin Zhang & Tianzhu Zhang & Xiang Liu, 2018. "Index System to Evaluate the Quarries Ecological Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:619-:d:133805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/3/619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Berke & John Cooper & Meghan Aminto & Shannon Grabich & Jennifer Horney, 2014. "Adaptive Planning for Disaster Recovery and Resiliency: An Evaluation of 87 Local Recovery Plans in Eight States," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(4), pages 310-323, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filippo Carlo Pavesi & Anna Richiedei & Michele Pezzagno, 2021. "Advanced Modelling Tools to Support Planning for Sand/Gravel Quarries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Sapfo Τsolaki-Fiaka & George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for an Abandoned Quarry in the Evros Region (NE Greece)," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Huiting Yu & Jiupai Ni, 2023. "The Comprehensive Management Zoning of Mountains, Rivers, Forests, and Farmlands Based on Element Recognition," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Yueshu Yang & Daxiang Liu & Hai Xiao & Jiangang Chen & Yu Ding & Dong Xia & Zhenyao Xia & Wennian Xu, 2019. "Evaluating the Effect of the Ecological Restoration of Quarry Slopes in Caidian District, Wuhan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aparna Kumari & Tim G. Frazier, 2021. "Evaluating social capital in emergency and disaster management and hazards plans," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 949-973, October.
    2. Sierra C. Woodruff, 2016. "Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 445-459, December.
    3. Susan Cutter, 2016. "The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 741-758, January.
    4. Heather Rosenberg & Nicole A. Errett & David P. Eisenman, 2022. "Working with Disaster-Affected Communities to Envision Healthier Futures: A Trauma-Informed Approach to Post-Disaster Recovery Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-8, February.
    5. Eric E. Calloway & Nadine B. Nugent & Katie L. Stern & Ashley Mueller & Amy L. Yaroch, 2022. "Lessons Learned from the 2019 Nebraska Floods: Implications for Emergency Management, Mass Care, and Food Security," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Lei He & Ziang Xie & Yi Peng & Yan Song & Shenzhi Dai, 2019. "How Can Post-Disaster Recovery Plans Be Improved Based on Historical Learning? A Comparison of Wenchuan Earthquake and Lushan Earthquake Recovery Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Lorenzo Fabian & Mattia Bertin, 2021. "Italy Is Fragile: Soil Consumption and Climate Change Combined Effects on Territorial Heritage Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Xinyu Fu & Bowen Sun & Kathryn Frank & Zhong-Ren Peng, 2019. "Evaluating sea-level rise vulnerability assessments in the USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 393-415, August.
    9. Mingming Xiang & Wei Zhao & Jiao Chen, 2018. "A Comparison of Different Reconstruction Modes and Adaptive Evaluation Systems for Community Recovery Following the Wenchuan Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Clemente J. Navarro-Yáñez & María-Jesús Rodríguez-García & María José Guerrero-Mayo, 2020. "Evaluating the Quality of Urban Development Plans Promoted by the European Union: The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 215-237, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:619-:d:133805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.