IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v66y2014i4d10.1007_bf03373719.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forschungsevaluation an Universitäten — Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie rechtsund wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fakultäten

Author

Listed:
  • Jost Sieweke

    (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf)

  • Johannes Muck

    (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf)

  • Stefan Süß

    (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf)

  • Justus Haucap

    (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung An deutschen hochschulen lassen sich in den letzten jahren verschiedene entwicklungen beobachten, die darauf zielen, sie stärker als bislang an Wirtschaftlichkeitsprinzipien auszurichten. Im Zuge dessen werden verschiedene Kriterien diskutiert, um die Forschungsleistung von Fakultäten und Professoren zu messen. Jedoch ist bislang unklar, wie Forschungsevaluation in der hochschulpraxis auf Fakultätsebene vollzogen wird. Hier setzt der Beitrag an, indem eine explorative empirische studie zur Forschungsevaluation in wirtschafts- und rechtswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten präsentiert wird. Im ergebnis zeigt sich unter anderem, dass neben der größe der Fakultäten auch ihre homogenität und das hauptsächlich vertretene Fach beeinflussen, ob Forschungsleistungen evaluiert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Jost Sieweke & Johannes Muck & Stefan Süß & Justus Haucap, 2014. "Forschungsevaluation an Universitäten — Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie rechtsund wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fakultäten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 274-305, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:66:y:2014:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373719
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373719
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alwine Mohnen & Kathrin Pokorny & Dirk Sliwka, 2008. "Transparency, Inequity Aversion, and the Dynamics of Peer Pressure in Teams: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(4), pages 693-720, October.
    2. repec:bla:germec:v:9:y:2008:i::p:473-505 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. John Hudson, 2007. "Be known by the company you keep: Citations — quality or chance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 231-238, May.
    4. Harald Dyckhoff & Sylvia Rassenhövel & Kirsten Sandfort, 2009. "Empirische Produktionsfunktion betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung: Eine Analyse der Daten des Centrums für Hochschulentwicklung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 22-56, February.
    5. Oliver E. Williamson, 1967. "Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(2), pages 123-123.
    6. Justus Haucap & Tobias Thomas, 2014. "Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung: Erreicht der Rat von Ökonomen Politik und Öffentlichkeit?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 94(3), pages 180-186, March.
    7. Kandel, Eugene & Lazear, Edward P, 1992. "Peer Pressure and Partnerships," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(4), pages 801-817, August.
    8. Bräuninger, Michael & Haucap, Justus & Muck, Johannes, 2011. "Was lesen und schätzen Ökonomen im Jahr 2011?," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 18, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    9. Axel Schlinghoff & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2002. "Publikationsindikatoren und die Stabilität wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenrankings," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 343-362, June.
    10. Katja Rost & Bruno S. Frey, 2011. "Quantitative and Qualitative Rankings of Scholars," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 63(1), pages 63-91, January.
    11. William H. Starbuck, 2005. "How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 180-200, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Friebel & Matthias Heinz & Miriam Krueger & Nikolay Zubanov, 2017. "Team Incentives and Performance: Evidence from a Retail Chain," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(8), pages 2168-2203, August.
    2. Gill, David & Stone, Rebecca, 2015. "Desert and inequity aversion in teams," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 42-54.
    3. Hernán Bejarano & Brice Corgnet & Joaquín Gómez-Miñambres, 2019. "Labor Contracts, Gift-Exchange and Reference Wages: Your Gift Need Not Be Mine!," Working Papers 19-26, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    4. SeEun Jung & Radu Vranceanu, 2017. "Gender Interaction in Teams: Experimental Evidence on Performance and Punishment Behavior," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 33, pages 95-126.
    5. Matthias Fahn & Hendrik Hakenes, 2019. "Teamwork as a Self-Disciplining Device," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Brice Corgnet, 2018. "Rac(g)e Against the Machine? Social Incentives When Humans Meet Robots," Post-Print halshs-01984467, HAL.
    7. Oswald, Andrew J., 2009. "World-Leading Research and its Measurement," Economic Research Papers 271312, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    8. Bejarano, Hernán & Corgnet, Brice & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín, 2021. "Economic stability promotes gift-exchange in the workplace," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 374-398.
    9. Andrew J. Oswald, 2010. "A suggested method for the measurement of world-leading research (illustrated with data on economics)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(1), pages 99-113, July.
    10. Corgnet, Brice & Hernán-González, Roberto & Mateo, Ricardo, 2023. "Peer effects in an automated world," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Roel van Veldhuizen & Hessel Oosterbeek & Joep Sonnemans, 2018. "Peers at work: Evidence from the lab," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Reyniers, Diane, 2018. "Peers and productivity: Evidence from an experimental factory," MPRA Paper 91215, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Daniela Collazos & Leopoldo Fergusson & Miguel La Rota & Daniel Mejía & Daniel Ortega, 2020. "CSI in the tropics: Experimental evidence of improved public service delivery through coordination," Documentos de Trabajo 18215, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association (LACEA).
    14. Massimo G. Colombo & Marco Delmastro, 2002. "The Determinants of Organizational Change and Structural Inertia: Technological and Organizational Factors," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 595-635, December.
    15. Rao, T.V.S. Ramamohan, 2011. "CES as an Organizational Production Function," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 69-81.
    16. Gall, Thomas & Hu, Xiaocheng & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2016. "Dynamic Incentive Effects of Team Formation: Experimental Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 10393, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Mehmet Bac, 2007. "Optimal supervision intensity, collusion, and the organization of work," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 317-339, February.
    18. Teraji, Shinji, 2008. "Culture, effort variability, and hierarchy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 157-166, February.
    19. Seeun Jung & Radu Vranceanu, 2015. "Gender Interaction in Teams: Experimental Evidence on Performance and Punishment Behavior," PSE Working Papers hal-01171161, HAL.
    20. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán-González & Stephen Rassenti, 2011. "Real Effort, Real Leisure and Real-time Supervision: Incentives and Peer Pressure in Virtual Organizations," Working Papers 11-05, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M10;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:66:y:2014:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.