IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v96y2013i1d10.1007_s11192-012-0885-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of authors’ information scattering: towards a causal explanation of information scattering from a scholarly information-seeking behavior perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zahed Bigdeli

    (Shahid Chamran University)

  • Morteza Kokabi

    (Shahid Chamran University)

  • Gholam Reza Rajabi

    (Shahid Chamran University)

  • Ali Gazni

    (Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC)
    Shahid Chamran University)

Abstract

This study primarily aims to reveal the worldwide patterns of authors’ information scattering through illustrating the possible differences among authors based on subject, country, geographic region, institution, economic and scientific level factors. Second, changes in patterns of information scattering during the past 21 years are checked. Finally, a hypothesis aimed at demonstrating a probable relationship among the three research domains including information scattering, scholarly information-seeking behavior and scholarly journal usage is presented. 176,943 authors, who have more than ten papers in WoS from 1990 to 2010 were examined. The findings revealed that patterns of information scattering have changed during the past 21 years, and the number of journals in the core and middle zones has almost doubled. It was also found that authors tend to use a small number of journals to retrieve the majority of their required information, while a small amount of their information needs come from a wide variety of journals. However, with regard to patterns of information scattering, some differences exist among authors based on factors including institutions, countries and subject fields. In addition, this study shows that information-scattering patterns might be affected by scholars’ information-seeking behaviors. A causal explanation of information scattering through scholarly information-seeking behavior has, without a doubt, the potential to provide practical solutions to better meet scholars’ information needs and requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahed Bigdeli & Morteza Kokabi & Gholam Reza Rajabi & Ali Gazni, 2013. "Patterns of authors’ information scattering: towards a causal explanation of information scattering from a scholarly information-seeking behavior perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 103-131, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0885-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0885-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-0885-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-012-0885-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen Belefant‐Miller & Donald W. King, 2003. "A profile of faculty reading and information‐use behaviors on the cusp of the electronic age," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(2), pages 179-181, January.
    2. Nchinda, Thomas C., 2002. "Research capacity strengthening in the South," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1699-1711, June.
    3. K.T.L. Vaughan, 2003. "Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: Impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(12), pages 1149-1152, October.
    4. Stephen J. Bensman & Loet Leydesdorff, 2009. "Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports methods and their effect on citation measures," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(6), pages 1097-1117, June.
    5. Christian Schloegl & Juan Gorraiz, 2011. "Global usage versus global citation metrics: The case of pharmacology journals," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 161-170, January.
    6. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The scatter of documents over databases in different subject domains: How many databases are needed?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(14), pages 1242-1254.
    7. Herbertz, Heinrich & Muller-Hill, Benno, 1995. "Quality and efficiency of basic research in molecular biology: a bibliometric analysis of thirteen excellent research institutes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 959-979, November.
    8. Philip M. Davis, 2004. "Information‐seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(4), pages 326-332, February.
    9. Christian Schloegl & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2004. "Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German‐language LIS journals—Citation analysis versus reader survey," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(13), pages 1155-1168, November.
    10. Cartwright,Nancy, 1999. "The Dappled World," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521643368, September.
    11. Philip M. Morse, 1981. "Implications of the exact bradford distribution," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 32(1), pages 43-50, January.
    12. A. Bookstein, 1997. "Informetric distributions. III. Ambiguity and randomness," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 48(1), pages 2-10, January.
    13. Cartwright,Nancy, 1999. "The Dappled World," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521644112, September.
    14. Howard D. White, 2001. "Authors as citers over time," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(2), pages 87-108.
    15. Tina E. Chrzastowski, 2003. "Making the transition from print to electronic serial collections: A new model for academic chemistry libraries?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(12), pages 1141-1148, October.
    16. Rob Kling & Geoffrey McKim, 2000. "Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(14), pages 1306-1320.
    17. Ryosuke L Ohniwa & Masatsugu Denawa & Mituko Kudo & Keiko Nakamura & Kunio Takeyasu, 2004. "Perspective factor: a novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 175-180, December.
    18. Christian Schloegl & Juan Gorraiz, 2011. "Global usage versus global citation metrics: The case of pharmacology journals," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 161-170, January.
    19. Jane Fedorowicz, 1982. "The Theoretical Foundation of Zipf's Law and Its Application to the Bibliographic Database Environment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 33(5), pages 285-293, September.
    20. B. C. Brookes, 1979. "The Bradford law: A new calculus for the social sciences?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 30(4), pages 233-234, July.
    21. F. W. Lancaster & Ja‐Lih Lee, 1985. "Bibliometric techniques applied to issues management: A case study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 36(6), pages 389-397, November.
    22. Zahed Bigdeli & Ali Gazni, 2012. "Authors’ sources of information: a new dimension in information scattering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 505-521, September.
    23. Mary J. Culnan, 1985. "The dimensions of perceived accessibility to information: Implications for the delivery of information systems and services," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 36(5), pages 302-308, September.
    24. Didegah, Fereshteh & Thelwall, Mike & Gazni, Ali, 2012. "An international comparison of journal publishing and citing behaviours," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 516-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Meijun & Hu, Xiao, 2021. "Will collaborators make scientists move? A Generalized Propensity Score analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    2. Giandomenica Becchio, 2020. "The Two Blades of Occam's Razor in Economics: Logical and Heuristic," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Julian Reiss, 2001. "Natural economic quantities and their measurement," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 287-311.
    4. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    5. Zahed Bigdeli & Ali Gazni, 2012. "Authors’ sources of information: a new dimension in information scattering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 505-521, September.
    6. Xianwen Wang & Zhichao Fang & Xiaoling Sun, 2016. "Usage patterns of scholarly articles on Web of Science: a study on Web of Science usage count," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 917-926, November.
    7. Florian Ellsaesser & Eric W. K. Tsang & Jochen Runde, 2014. "Models of causal inference: Imperfect but applicable is better than perfect but inapplicable," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(10), pages 1541-1551, October.
    8. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2003. "Informetric studies using databases: Opportunities and challenges," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 587-608, November.
    9. Stephen Pratten, 2007. "Realism, closed systems and abstraction," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 473-497.
    10. Kinouchi, Renato, 2018. "Philosophical issues related to risks and values," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote & Félix Moya-Anegón, 2014. "Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1043-1065, November.
    12. Marcel Boumans & Mary Morgan, 2002. "Ceteris paribus conditions: materiality and the application of economic theories," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 11-26.
    13. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2003. "Laws and Limits of Econometrics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 26-52, March.
    14. Midgley, Gerald, 2008. "Response to paper "Systems thinking" by D. Cabrera et al.:: The unification of systems thinking: Is there gold at the end of the rainbow?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 317-321, August.
    15. Nicolas Brisset, 2018. "Models as speech acts: the telling case of financial models," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 21-41, January.
    16. Toby Ord & Rafaela Hillerbrand & Anders Sandberg, 2010. "Probing the improbable: methodological challenges for risks with low probabilities and high stakes," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 191-205, March.
    17. Enzo Lenine, 2020. "Modelling Coalitions: From Concept Formation to Tailoring Empirical Explanations," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, November.
    18. Simon Hall & Nilufa Ali & Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford, 2016. "Discounting and Augmentation in Causal Conditional Reasoning: Causal Models or Shallow Encoding?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Paul Shaffer, 2018. "Causal pluralism and mixed methods in the analysis of poverty dynamics," WIDER Working Paper Series 115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Christian Schlögl & Juan Gorraiz & Christian Gumpenberger & Kris Jack & Peter Kraker, 2014. "Comparison of downloads, citations and readership data for two information systems journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1113-1128, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:96:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-012-0885-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.