IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v112y2017i3d10.1007_s11192-017-2435-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production of educational theory doctoral theses in Spain (2001–2015)

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Javier Ramos-Pardo

    (University of Castilla-La Mancha)

  • Pablo Sánchez-Antolín

    (University of Castilla-La Mancha)

Abstract

The essential function of scientific disciplines is to generate knowledge using the scientific method. In a context characterised by acknowledgement of methodological complementarity and the existence of innumerable mechanisms for production (articles, theses…) and dissemination (databases, platforms…), production is a measure of any given discipline’s normative development and projection. As a result of this situation, in Pedagogy—and, more specifically, in Educational Theory—we can witness a growing concern with systematising knowledge in a complex and dynamic context and based on reference frameworks. Therefore, this article aims to describe scientific production in Educational Theory, with the intention of discovering the creation and dissemination processes involved in theses retrieved from the Spanish doctoral theses database TESEO (2001–2015). A descriptive-comparative census study was carried out, with a total of n = 229 sampling units. The results show the following: thematic axes, which categorise thesis content into groups, are present; dissemination is influenced by the non-specific use of keywords, as well as by the area’s organisation and structure in different universities; there are no statistically significant differences in terms of author gender. In conclusion, we can identify an ever greater intention to provide the area with more scientific content but little concern with increasing this content’s visibility in databases such as TESEO. All in all, research production in Spain relating to Educational Theory is a good representative sample of researchers’ efforts to project their interest in discovering, understanding and improving education. Therefore, special care should be taken when compiling production data in databases.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Javier Ramos-Pardo & Pablo Sánchez-Antolín, 2017. "Production of educational theory doctoral theses in Spain (2001–2015)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1615-1630, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2435-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2435-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2435-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-017-2435-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Manuel Torralbo & Mónica Vallejo, 2012. "Time series of scientific growth in Spanish doctoral theses (1848–2009)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 15-36, April.
    2. Renato X. Coutinho & Eliziane S. Dávila & Wendel M. dos Santos & João B. T. Rocha & Diogo O. G. Souza & Vanderlei Folmer & Robson L. Puntel, 2012. "Brazilian scientific production in science education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 697-710, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nataly Matias-Rayme & Iuliana Botezan & Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa & Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez, 2024. "Gender assignment in doctoral theses: revisiting Teseo with a method based on cultural consensus theory," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4553-4572, July.
    2. Inés M. Fernández-Guerrero & Zoraida Callejas & David Griol & Antonio Fernández-Cano, 2020. "Longitudinal patterns in Spanish doctoral theses on scientific medical information: a tertiary study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1241-1260, August.
    3. V. Hernández-González & A. Pano-Rodríguez & J. Reverter-Masia, 2020. "Spanish doctoral theses in physical activity and sports sciences and authors’ scientific publications (LUSTRUM 2013–2017)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 661-679, January.
    4. Antonio Antúnez & Sergio J. Ibáñez & Sebastian Feu, 2021. "Analysis of the Research Methodology in Spanish Doctoral Theses on Handball. A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George R. Milne & Begum Kaplan & Kristen L. Walker & Larry Zacharias, 2021. "Connecting with the future: The role of science fiction movies in helping consumers understand privacy‐technology trade‐offs," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 737-762, September.
    2. Norma Salgado-Orellana & Emilio Berrocal de-Luna & Calixto Gutiérrez-Braojos, 2021. "A scientometric study of doctoral theses on the Roma in the Iberian Peninsula during the 1977–2018 period," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 437-458, January.
    3. Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen & Samile Andréa de Souza Vanz, 2023. "The development of Brazilian women’s and gender studies: a bibliometric diagnosis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 227-261, January.
    4. Ghada A. Altarawneh & Ahmad B. Hassanat & Ahmad S. Tarawneh & David Carfì & Abdullah Almuhaimeed, 2022. "Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Arifa sulthana & A. Muni Kumari & Lankala Ravindranath Reddy & Maddigalla Chandra sekhar & S. Babulla, 2024. "Kadapa Municipal Corporation Door To Door Garbage Collection And Solid Waste Management System: A Survey On Its Implementation, Importance And Effectiveness," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 10(03), June.
    6. Daniel Henrique Roos & Luciana Calabró & Sandra Lopes Jesus & Diogo Onofre Souza & Nilda Vargas Barbosa & João Batista Teixeira Rocha, 2014. "Brazilian scientific production in areas of biological sciences: a comparative study on the modalities of full doctorate in Brazil or abroad," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 415-427, January.
    7. Eloisa Viggiani & Luciana Calabró, 2020. "Does faculty disciplinary background play a role in the publication pattern of an interdisciplinary research area? The case of science education in Brazil," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 893-908, November.
    8. Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez & Iuliana Botezan & Jesús Barrasa-Rodríguez & Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa & Manuel Blázquez-Ochando, 2023. "Gender imbalance in doctoral education: an analysis of the Spanish university system (1977–2021)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2577-2599, April.
    9. Iñaki Bildosola & Gaizka Garechana & Enara Zarrabeitia & Ernesto Cilleruelo, 2020. "Characterization of strategic emerging technologies: the case of big data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 45-60, March.
    10. Elenara Chaves Edler Almeida & Jorge Almeida Guimarães, 2013. "Brazil’s growing production of scientific articles—how are we doing with review articles and other qualitative indicators?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 287-315, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:112:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-017-2435-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.