IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v104y2015i3d10.1007_s11192-015-1629-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Liu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Qiong Wu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xiangming Mu

    (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)

  • Kaipeng Yu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Yiting Guo

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Detecting intellectual structure of a knowledge domain is valuable to track the dynamics of scientific research. Formal concept analysis (FCA) provides a new perspective for knowledge discovery and data mining. In this paper we introduce a FCA-based approach to detect intellectual structure of library and information science (LIS). Our approach relies on the mathematical theory which formulates the understanding of “concept” as a unit of extension (scholars) and intension (keywords) as a way of modelling the intellectual structure of a domain. By analyzing the papers published in sixteen prominent journals of LIS domain from 2001 to 2013, the intellectual structure of LIS in the new century has been identified and visualized. Nine major research themes of LIS were detected together with the core keywords and authors to describe each theme. The significant advantage of our approach is that the mathematical formulae produce a conceptual structure which automatically provides generalization and specialization relationships among the concepts. This provides additional information not available from other methods, especially when shared interests of authors from different granularities are also visualized in concept lattice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Liu & Qiong Wu & Xiangming Mu & Kaipeng Yu & Yiting Guo, 2015. "Detecting the intellectual structure of library and information science based on formal concept analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 737-762, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1629-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1629-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1629-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1629-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang-Ping Hu & Ji-Ming Hu & Sheng-Li Deng & Yong Liu, 2013. "A co-word analysis of library and information science in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 369-382, November.
    2. Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Blaise Cronin, 2012. "A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 997-1016, May.
    3. Shimelis G. Assefa & Abebe Rorissa, 2013. "A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co‐word analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2513-2536, December.
    4. Staša Milojević & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2011. "The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1933-1953, October.
    5. Navonil Mustafee & Korina Katsaliaki & Paul Fishwick, 2014. "Exploring the modelling and simulation knowledge base through journal co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2145-2159, March.
    6. Chang-Ping Hu & Ji-Ming Hu & Yan Gao & Yao-Kun Zhang, 2011. "A journal co-citation analysis of library and information science in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 657-670, March.
    7. Ma, Ruimin, 2012. "Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic database," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 532-542.
    8. Shimelis G. Assefa & Abebe Rorissa, 2013. "A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(12), pages 2513-2536, December.
    9. Mike Thelwall, 2008. "Quantitative comparisons of search engine results," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(11), pages 1702-1710, September.
    10. Bo Yang & Ying Sun, 2013. "An exploration of link-based knowledge map in academic web space," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 239-253, July.
    11. Liang-Chu Chen & Yen-Hsuan Lien, 2011. "Using author co-citation analysis to examine the intellectual structure of e-learning: A MIS perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 89(3), pages 867-886, December.
    12. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(2), pages 291-314, October.
    13. Ji-ping Gao & Kun Ding & Li Teng & Jie Pang, 2012. "Hybrid documents co-citation analysis: making sense of the interaction between science and technology in technology diffusion," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(2), pages 459-471, November.
    14. Howard D. White & Belver C. Griffith, 1981. "Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 32(3), pages 163-171, May.
    15. Per Ahlgren & Bo Jarneving, 2008. "Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(2), pages 273-290, August.
    16. Vincent Larivière & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Blaise Cronin, 2012. "A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(5), pages 997-1016, May.
    17. Staša Milojević & Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2011. "The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 1933-1953, October.
    18. Yu-Wei Chang & Mu-Hsuan Huang, 2012. "A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 22-33, January.
    19. Yu‐Wei Chang & Mu‐Hsuan Huang, 2012. "A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science: Using three bibliometric methods," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(1), pages 22-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoguang Wang & Hongyu Wang & Han Huang, 2021. "Evolutionary exploration and comparative analysis of the research topic networks in information disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4991-5017, June.
    2. Sabrina Petersohn & Thomas Heinze, 2018. "Professionalization of bibliometric research assessment. Insights from the history of the Leiden Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 565-578.
    3. Marcel Dunaiski & Gillian J. Greene & Bernd Fischer, 2017. "Exploratory search of academic publication and citation data using interactive tag cloud visualizations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1539-1571, March.
    4. Xiaoyao Han, 2020. "Evolution of research topics in LIS between 1996 and 2019: an analysis based on latent Dirichlet allocation topic model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2561-2595, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuen-Hsien Tseng & Ming-Yueh Tsay, 2013. "Journal clustering of library and information science for subfield delineation using the bibliometric analysis toolkit: CATAR," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(2), pages 503-528, May.
    2. Guo Chen & Lu Xiao & Chang-ping Hu & Xue-qin Zhao, 2015. "Identifying the research focus of Library and Information Science institutions in China with institution-specific keywords," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 707-724, May.
    3. María Pinto & Rosaura Fernández-Pascual & David Caballero-Mariscal & Dora Sales, 2020. "Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1479-1510, August.
    4. Xiaoguang Wang & Hongyu Wang & Han Huang, 2021. "Evolutionary exploration and comparative analysis of the research topic networks in information disciplines," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4991-5017, June.
    5. Pin Li & Guoli Yang & Chuanqi Wang, 2019. "Visual topical analysis of library and information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1753-1791, December.
    6. Hao Wang & Sanhong Deng & Xinning Su, 2016. "A study on construction and analysis of discipline knowledge structure of Chinese LIS based on CSSCI," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1725-1759, December.
    7. Chen, Guo & Xiao, Lu, 2016. "Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 212-223.
    8. Abhijit Thakuria & Dipen Deka, 2024. "A decadal study on identifying latent topics and research trends in open access LIS journals using topic modeling approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 3841-3869, July.
    9. Mu-hsuan Huang & Wang-Ching Shaw & Chi-Shiou Lin, 2019. "One category, two communities: subfield differences in “Information Science and Library Science” in Journal Citation Reports," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1059-1079, May.
    10. Min Song & Go Eun Heo & Su Yeon Kim, 2014. "Analyzing topic evolution in bioinformatics: investigation of dynamics of the field with conference data in DBLP," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 397-428, October.
    11. Jingjing Ren & Fang Wang & Minglu Li, 2023. "Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4383-4419, August.
    12. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    13. Tian, Yunpei & Li, Gang & Mao, Jin, 2023. "Predicting the evolution of scientific communities by interpretable machine learning approaches," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    14. Yu-Wei Chang, 2018. "Examining interdisciplinarity of library and information science (LIS) based on LIS articles contributed by non-LIS authors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1589-1613, September.
    15. Pu Han & Jin Shi & Xiaoyan Li & Dongbo Wang & Si Shen & Xinning Su, 2014. "International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 53-72, January.
    16. Carlos G. Figuerola & Francisco Javier García Marco & María Pinto, 2017. "Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1507-1535, September.
    17. Yi Bu & Binglu Wang & Win-bin Huang & Shangkun Che & Yong Huang, 2018. "Using the appearance of citations in full text on author co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 275-289, July.
    18. Yang, Siluo & Han, Ruizhen & Wolfram, Dietmar & Zhao, Yuehua, 2016. "Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 132-150.
    19. Jun-Ping Qiu & Ke Dong & Hou-Qiang Yu, 2014. "Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1345-1360, November.
    20. Marie Katsurai & Shunsuke Ono, 2019. "TrendNets: mapping emerging research trends from dynamic co-word networks via sparse representation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1583-1598, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:104:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1629-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.