IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/roafes/v98y2017i1d10.1007_s41130-017-0044-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autonomy under contract: the case of traditional free-range poultry farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile J.M. Adam

    (Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, UMR 1225, IHAP
    EPIA, INRA, VetAgro Sup
    INRA)

  • Christian P.M. Ducrot

    (EPIA, INRA, VetAgro Sup)

  • Mathilde C. Paul

    (Université de Toulouse, INP, ENVT, UMR 1225, IHAP)

  • Nicolas Fortané

    (INRA)

Abstract

This article explores the autonomy developed by free-range poultry farmers in their daily work. In this type of livestock production, farmers are linked by a contract to a farmer organization, to which they sell their broilers in exchange for a payment resembling a salary. The farmers do have autonomy in their work, which is framed by a set of prescriptions and rules. As they experience the same constraints, farmers involved in the same production mode develop a collective identity. Relationships of confidence progressively develop between the farmers and their technical staff (veterinary practitioners and production technicians). These good relationships strengthen the collective identity while also enabling the collective work between the three professionals. Veterinary practitioners and production technicians consecutively share some of the constraints and transfer part of their decision-making to the farmers. The latter thereby acquire more autonomy, even in fields apparently out of their reach. We illustrate the latter idea with the example of antimicrobial use. We observe that while strictly supervised by veterinary practitioners, farmers nevertheless manage to get involved in the decision underlying the prescription of antimicrobials.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile J.M. Adam & Christian P.M. Ducrot & Mathilde C. Paul & Nicolas Fortané, 2017. "Autonomy under contract: the case of traditional free-range poultry farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 55-74, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:roafes:v:98:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s41130-017-0044-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s41130-017-0044-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41130-017-0044-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41130-017-0044-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonella Corsani, 2012. "Autonomie et hétéronomie dans les marges du salariat. Les journalistes pigistes et les intermittents du spectacle porteurs de projets," Post-Print hal-00964483, HAL.
    2. Nicourt, Christian & Cabaret, Jacques, 2014. "La disqualification sociale des éleveurs intégrés," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 95(02), pages 227-253, June.
    3. Pascale Magdelaine & Guillaume Coutelet & Sabine Duvaleix-Treguer, 2015. "La contractualisation dans le secteur aviculture chair," Post-Print hal-01123363, HAL.
    4. Christian Nicourt & Jacques Cabaret, 2014. "La disqualification sociale des éleveurs intégrés," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 95(2), pages 227-253.
    5. Antonella Corsani, 2012. "Autonomie et hétéronomie dans les marges du salariat. Les journalistes pigistes et les intermittents du spectacle porteurs de projets," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00964483, HAL.
    6. Nicourt, Christian & Cabaret, Jacques, 2014. "La disqualification sociale des éleveurs intégrés," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonnaud, Laure & Fortané, Nicolas, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(1), April.
    2. Eulalie Ramat & Lucie Gouttenoire & Nathalie Girard, 2023. "How do farmers choose the professionals with whom they work to ensure herd health management? An approach based on the diversity of prescription systems in dairy cattle farming," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 217-242, June.
    3. Laure Bonnaud & Nicolas Fortané, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 125-149, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam, Cécile J.M. & Ducrot, Christian P.M. & Paul, Mathilde C. & Fortané, Nicolas, . "Autonomy under contract: the case of traditional free-range poultry farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 98(1/2).
    2. Marie-Christine Bureau & Antonella Corsani, 2018. "Collective actions on the margins of the salariat," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(3), pages 279-295, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Work; Autonomy; Livestock farming; Integration; Antimicrobials; Broiler;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q19 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Other
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:roafes:v:98:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s41130-017-0044-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.