IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frrfes/329938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research

Author

Listed:
  • Bonnaud, Laure
  • Fortané, Nicolas

Abstract

This article presents a review of the social science literature on the veterinary profession. It highlights the current debates on the profession. The texts discussed in this review mainly relate to the fields of history, sociology, political sciences and social geography, although multidisciplinary or management studies publications are sometimes referred to. This article analyses four major structuring dynamics: the sociodemographic evolutions that are currently taking place within the profession (1); the transformation of practices and knowledge in relation, on the one hand, to the increase in the number of pets (2) and, on the other hand, to the evolution of farming systems (3); and the ways public authorities govern veterinary public health (4).

Suggested Citation

  • Bonnaud, Laure & Fortané, Nicolas, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(01), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:329938
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329938/files/s41130-020-00103-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Clarke & David Knights, 2019. "Who's a good boy then? Anthropocentric masculinities in veterinary practice," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 267-287, April.
    2. Thomas Alam, 2009. "La vache folle et les vétérinaires. Récit d’une victoire inattendue et paradoxale sur le terrain de la sécurité sanitaire des aliments," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 90(4), pages 373-398.
    3. Cécile J.M. Adam & Christian P.M. Ducrot & Mathilde C. Paul & Nicolas Fortané, 2017. "Autonomy under contract: the case of traditional free-range poultry farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 55-74, July.
    4. Bonnaud, Laure & Coppalle, Jêrome, 2009. "Les inspecteurs vétérinaires face aux normes privées," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 90(4).
    5. Cécile J.M. Adam & Christian P.M. Ducrot & Mathilde C. Paul & Nicolas Fortané, 2017. "Autonomy under contract: the case of traditionalfree-range poultry farmers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 98(1-2), pages 55-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laure Bonnaud & Nicolas Fortané, 2021. "Being a vet: the veterinary profession in social science research," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 125-149, June.
    2. Eulalie Ramat & Lucie Gouttenoire & Nathalie Girard, 2023. "How do farmers choose the professionals with whom they work to ensure herd health management? An approach based on the diversity of prescription systems in dairy cattle farming," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 217-242, June.
    3. Muriel Surdez & Lorène Piquerez & Alexandre Hobeika, 2021. "Torn between responsibility and loyalty: how the veterinarian profession designs antibiotic resistance policies that shake its foundations," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(2), pages 191-211, June.
    4. Caroline Clarke & David Knights, 2022. "Milking It for All It’s Worth: Unpalatable Practices, Dairy Cows and Veterinary Work?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 673-688, April.
    5. Lauren Dundes, 2020. "Elsa as Horse Whisperer in Disney’s Frozen 2 : Opportunity “Nokk”s to Quash Gender Stereotypes," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Linda Tallberg & José-Carlos García-Rosell & Minni Haanpää, 2022. "Human–Animal Relations in Business and Society: Advancing the Feminist Interpretation of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Surdez, Muriel & Piquerez, Lorène & Hobeika, Alexandre, 2020. "Torn between responsibility and loyalty: how the veterinarian profession designs antibiotic resistance policies that shake its foundations," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 102(1), November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:329938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.