IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v96y2020i3d10.1007_s11134-020-09674-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deterministic state-based information disclosure policies and social welfare maximization in strategic queueing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tesnim Naceur

    (LIA/CERI, University of Avignon)

  • Yezekael Hayel

    (LIA/CERI, University of Avignon)

Abstract

Understanding the impact of the queue length information on the behavior of customers is nowadays a hot topic for strategic queueing problems. Particularly, it is important to understand how this information impacts the equilibrium behavior and therefore global performance metrics in order to give some recommendations to service providers for optimizing their objective. Recent works are focused on information policies in order to optimize the provider’s profit. In this work, the aim is to maximize the expected social welfare. It is intuitive that the expected social welfare is higher when more information is available to new customers. In some circumstances, and particularly when the queue is overloaded, providing the information up to a particular level of occupancy yields a better expected social welfare compared to always providing queue length information to new customers. This counterintuitive result comes mainly from the strategic behavior of customers at equilibrium when queue length information is not available. After proving that there exists such an optimal information disclosure policy (IDP) for arbitrary arrival and service rates, we go further and study the expected social welfare for the overloaded context in which the arrival rate equals the service rate. Finally, numerical illustrations corroborate our contributions, and moreover, they show that an admission control policy can be also proposed, combined with an IDP, in order to optimize the expected social welfare of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tesnim Naceur & Yezekael Hayel, 2020. "Deterministic state-based information disclosure policies and social welfare maximization in strategic queueing systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 303-328, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:96:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-020-09674-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-020-09674-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-020-09674-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-020-09674-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoav Kerner & Eliran Sherzer & Mor Ann Yanco, 2017. "On non-equilibria threshold strategies in ticket queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 419-431, August.
    2. Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Itai Gurvich, 2011. "“We Will Be Right with You”: Managing Customer Expectations with Vague Promises and Cheap Talk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1382-1394, December.
    3. Refael Hassin & Ricky Roet-Green, 2017. "The Impact of Inspection Cost on Equilibrium, Revenue, and Social Welfare in a Single-Server Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 804-820, June.
    4. Hassin, Refael, 1986. "Consumer Information in Markets with Random Product Quality: The Case of Queues and Balking," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 54(5), pages 1185-1195, September.
    5. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.
    6. Edelson, Noel M & Hildebrand, David K, 1975. "Congestion Tolls for Poisson Queuing Processes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(1), pages 81-92, January.
    7. Susan H. Xu & Long Gao & Jihong Ou, 2007. "Service Performance Analysis and Improvement for a Ticket Queue with Balking Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 971-990, June.
    8. Shone, Rob & Knight, Vincent A. & Williams, Janet E., 2013. "Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 133-141.
    9. Balachandran, K. R. & Schaefer, Mark E., 1980. "Public and private optimization at a service facility with approximate information on congestion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 195-202, March.
    10. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    11. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrios Logothetis & Antonis Economou, 2023. "The impact of information on transportation systems with strategic customers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2189-2206, July.
    2. Pengfei Guo & Moshe Haviv & Zhenwei Luo & Yulan Wang, 2022. "Optimal queue length information disclosure when service quality is uncertain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1912-1927, May.
    3. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    4. Opher Baron & Antonis Economou & Athanasia Manou, 2022. "Increasing social welfare with delays: Strategic customers in the M/G/1 orbit queue," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(7), pages 2907-2924, July.
    5. Czerny, Achim I. & Guo, Pengfei & Hassin, Refael, 2022. "Shall firms withhold exact waiting time information from their customers? A transport example," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 128-142.
    6. Zhongbin Wang & Yunan Liu & Lei Fang, 2022. "Pay to activate service in vacation queues," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2609-2627, June.
    7. Sweeney, Kevin D. & Sweeney, Donald C. & Campbell, James F., 2019. "The performance of priority dispatching rules in a complex job shop: A study on the Upper Mississippi River," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 154-172.
    8. David Lingenbrink & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2019. "Optimal Signaling Mechanisms in Unobservable Queues," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1397-1416, September.
    9. Nur Sunar & Yichen Tu & Serhan Ziya, 2021. "Pooled vs. Dedicated Queues when Customers Are Delay-Sensitive," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3785-3802, June.
    10. Antonis Economou, 2022. "How much information should be given to the strategic customers of a queueing system?," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 421-423, April.
    11. Opher Baron & Xiaole Chen & Yang Li, 2023. "Omnichannel Services: The False Premise and Operational Remedies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 865-884, February.
    12. Olga Bountali & Apostolos Burnetas & Lerzan Örmeci, 2022. "Join, balk, or jettison? The effect of flexibility and ranking knowledge in systems with batch arrivals," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(9), pages 3505-3524, September.
    13. Qiuping Yu & Yiming Zhang & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2022. "Delay Information in Virtual Queues: A Large-Scale Field Experiment on a Major Ride-Sharing Platform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5745-5757, August.
    14. Shone, Rob & Knight, Vincent A. & Williams, Janet E., 2013. "Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 133-141.
    15. Ziani, Sofiane & Rahmoune, Fazia & Radjef, Mohammed Said, 2015. "Customers’ strategic behavior in batch arrivals M2/M/1 queue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 895-903.
    16. Caner Canyakmaz & Tamer Boyaci, 2018. "Queueing systems with rationally inattentive customers," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-18-04_R1, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 01 Oct 2020.
    17. Sun, Ke, 2024. "Strategic responses to the aggregator platform: Pricing and information sharing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Shiliang Cui & Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang, 2020. "The Economics of Line-Sitting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 227-242, January.
    19. Youxin Liu & Liwei Liu & Tao Jiang & Xudong Chai, 2024. "Strategic Queueing Behavior of Two Groups of Patients in a Healthcare System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Ming Hu & Yang Li & Jianfu Wang, 2018. "Efficient Ignorance: Information Heterogeneity in a Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2650-2671, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:96:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s11134-020-09674-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.