IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v84y2016i1d10.1007_s11134-016-9493-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of ticket and standard queues

Author

Listed:
  • Otis B. Jennings
  • Jamol Pender

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Upon arrival to a ticket queue, a customer is offered a slip of paper with a number on it—indicating the order of arrival to the system—and is told the number of the customer currently in service. The arriving customer then chooses whether to take the slip or balk, a decision based on the perceived queue length and associated waiting time. Even after taking a ticket, a customer may abandon the queue, an event that will be unobservable until the abandoning customer would have begun service. In contrast, a standard queue has a physical waiting area so that abandonment is apparent immediately when it takes place and balking is based on the actual queue length at the time of arrival. We prove heavy traffic limit theorems for the generalized ticket and standard queueing processes, discovering that the processes converge together to the same limit, a regulated Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. One conclusion is that for a highly utilized service system with a relatively patient customer population, the ticket and standard queue performances are asymptotically indistinguishable on the scale typically uncovered under heavy traffic approaches. Next, we heuristically estimate several performance metrics of the ticket queue, some of which are of a sensitivity typically undetectable under diffusion scaling. The estimates are tested using simulation and are shown to be quite accurate under a general collection of parameter settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Otis B. Jennings & Jamol Pender, 2016. "Comparisons of ticket and standard queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 145-202, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9493-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-016-9493-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-016-9493-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-016-9493-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. E. Reed & Amy R. Ward, 2008. "Approximating the GI/GI/1+GI Queue with a Nonlinear Drift Diffusion: Hazard Rate Scaling in Heavy Traffic," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 606-644, August.
    2. Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2011. "The Impact of Delaying the Delay Announcements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1198-1210, October.
    3. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2009. "Real-Time Delay Estimation Based on Delay History," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 397-415, May.
    4. Susan H. Xu & Long Gao & Jihong Ou, 2007. "Service Performance Analysis and Improvement for a Ticket Queue with Balking Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 971-990, June.
    5. Pengfei Guo & Paul Zipkin, 2007. "Analysis and Comparison of Queues with Different Levels of Delay Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 962-970, June.
    6. Ward Whitt, 1999. "Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 192-207, February.
    7. Otis B. Jennings & Josh E. Reed, 2012. "An Overloaded Multiclass FIFO Queue with Abandonments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1282-1295, October.
    8. Ward Whitt, 2004. "Efficiency-Driven Heavy-Traffic Approximations for Many-Server Queues with Abandonments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1449-1461, October.
    9. H. Christian Gromoll & Philippe Robert & Bert Zwart, 2008. "Fluid Limits for Processor-Sharing Queues with Impatience," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 375-402, May.
    10. Otis B. Jennings, 2010. "Averaging Principles for a Diffusion-Scaled, Heavy-Traffic Polling Station with K Job Classes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 669-703, August.
    11. Mor Armony & Nahum Shimkin & Ward Whitt, 2009. "The Impact of Delay Announcements in Many-Server Queues with Abandonment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 66-81, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Xiao & Susan H. Xu & David D. Yao & Hanqin Zhang, 2022. "Optimal staffing for ticket queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 309-351, October.
    2. Jamol Pender & Richard Rand & Elizabeth Wesson, 2020. "A Stochastic Analysis of Queues with Customer Choice and Delayed Information," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1104-1126, August.
    3. Gabi Hanukov & Michael Hassoun & Oren Musicant, 2021. "On the Benefits of Providing Timely Information in Ticket Queues with Balking and Calling Times," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Kaan Kuzu & Long Gao & Susan H. Xu, 2019. "To Wait or Not to Wait: The Theory and Practice of Ticket Queues," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 853-874, October.
    5. Kaan Kuzu & Refik Soyer, 2018. "Bayesian modeling of abandonments in ticket queues," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(6-7), pages 499-521, September.
    6. Baris Ata & Peter W. Glynn & Xiaoshan Peng, 2017. "An equilibrium analysis of a discrete-time Markovian queue with endogenous abandonments," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 141-212, June.
    7. Kwangji Kim & Mi-Jung Kim & Jae-Kyoon Jun, 2020. "Small Queuing Restaurant Sustainable Revenue Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Gabi Hanukov & Shoshana Anily & Uri Yechiali, 2020. "Ticket queues with regular and strategic customers," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 145-171, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeynep Akşin & Baris Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2017. "Impact of Delay Announcements in Call Centers: An Empirical Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 242-265, February.
    2. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    3. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2011. "Wait-Time Predictors for Customer Service Systems with Time-Varying Demand and Capacity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1106-1118, October.
    4. Miao Yu & Yu Zhao & Chunguang Chang & Liangliang Sun, 2023. "Fluid models for customer service web chat systems with interactive automated service," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 572-598, June.
    5. Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2011. "The Impact of Delaying the Delay Announcements," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1198-1210, October.
    6. Jamol Pender & Richard Rand & Elizabeth Wesson, 2020. "A Stochastic Analysis of Queues with Customer Choice and Delayed Information," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1104-1126, August.
    7. Oualid Jouini & Zeynep Akşin & Yves Dallery, 2011. "Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 534-548, October.
    8. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2009. "Real-Time Delay Estimation in Overloaded Multiserver Queues with Abandonments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1729-1742, October.
    9. Najiya Fatma & Varun Ramamohan, 2023. "Patient diversion using real-time delay predictions across healthcare facility networks," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(2), pages 437-476, June.
    10. Junfei Huang & Avishai Mandelbaum & Hanqin Zhang & Jiheng Zhang, 2017. "Refined Models for Efficiency-Driven Queues with Applications to Delay Announcements and Staffing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1380-1397, October.
    11. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2017. "How Do Delay Announcements Shape Customer Behavior? An Empirical Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Athanasia Manou & Antonis Economou & Fikri Karaesmen, 2014. "Strategic Customers in a Transportation Station: When Is It Optimal to Wait?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 910-925, August.
    13. Noa Zychlinski, 2023. "Applications of fluid models in service operations management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 161-185, February.
    14. Guo, Pengfei & Sun, Wei & Wang, Yulan, 2011. "Equilibrium and optimal strategies to join a queue with partial information on service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 284-297, October.
    15. Kaan Kuzu & Long Gao & Susan H. Xu, 2019. "To Wait or Not to Wait: The Theory and Practice of Ticket Queues," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 853-874, October.
    16. Zhang, Zhe George & Yin, Xiaoling, 2021. "Information and pricing effects in two-tier public service systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Qiuping Yu & Yiming Zhang & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2022. "Delay Information in Virtual Queues: A Large-Scale Field Experiment on a Major Ride-Sharing Platform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(8), pages 5745-5757, August.
    18. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2021. "The Reference Effect of Delay Announcements: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7417-7437, December.
    19. Lu, Yuwei & Xie, Xiaolan & Jiang, Zhibin, 2018. "Dynamic appointment scheduling with wait-dependent abandonment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 975-984.
    20. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Yoav Kerner, 2013. "Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 492-506, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-016-9493-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.