IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/queues/v82y2016i1d10.1007_s11134-015-9458-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust queueing theory: an initial study using imprecise probabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Stavros Lopatatzidis

    (Ghent University)

  • Jasper Bock

    (Ghent University)

  • Gert Cooman

    (Ghent University)

  • Stijn Vuyst

    (Ghent University)

  • Joris Walraevens

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

We study the robustness of performance predictions of discrete-time finite-capacity queues by applying the framework of imprecise probabilities. More concretely, we consider the Geo/Geo/1/L model with probabilities of arrival and departure that are no longer fixed, but are allowed to vary within given intervals. We distinguish between two concepts of independence in this framework, namely repetition independence and epistemic irrelevance. In the first approach, we assume the existence of time-homogeneous probabilities for arrival and departure, which leads us to consider a collection of stationary queues. In the second, the stationarity assumption is dropped and we allow the arrival and departure probabilities to vary from time point to time point; they may even depend on the complete history of queue lengths. We calculate bounds on the expected queue length, the probability of a particular queue length and the probability of turning on the server. For the expected queue length, both approaches coincide. For the other performance measures, we observe and discuss various differences between the bounds obtained for these two approaches. One of our observations is that ergodicity may break down due to imprecision: bounds on expected time averages of certain functions on the state space are not necessarily equal to the bounds on the expectation of that function at random instants in a steady-state queue.

Suggested Citation

  • Stavros Lopatatzidis & Jasper Bock & Gert Cooman & Stijn Vuyst & Joris Walraevens, 2016. "Robust queueing theory: an initial study using imprecise probabilities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 75-101, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:82:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-015-9458-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11134-015-9458-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11134-015-9458-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11134-015-9458-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rubinstein, Reuven Y., 1997. "Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 89-112, May.
    2. Xia, Li & Cao, Xi-Ren, 2012. "Performance optimization of queueing systems with perturbation realization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 293-304.
    3. D. Škulj & R. Hable, 2013. "Coefficients of ergodicity for Markov chains with uncertain parameters," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 107-133, January.
    4. Couso, Ines & Moral, Serafin & Walley, Peter, 2000. "A survey of concepts of independence for imprecise probabilities," Risk, Decision and Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 165-181, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    2. Kristoffel C. Pandiangan & Palti Maruli Tua Sitorus, 2017. "Analysis of Queue System to Improve the Quality of Service in GraPARI Telkomsel Banda Aceh," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 2(4), pages 220-226.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K.-P. Hui & N. Bean & M. Kraetzl & Dirk Kroese, 2005. "The Cross-Entropy Method for Network Reliability Estimation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 101-118, February.
    2. Patelli, Edoardo & Feng, Geng & Coolen, Frank P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2017. "Simulation methods for system reliability using the survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 327-337.
    3. Dubois, Didier, 2006. "Possibility theory and statistical reasoning," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 47-69, November.
    4. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Eshragh, Ali, 2015. "A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning:A leanness-versus-greenness analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 173-190.
    5. Ludvík Friebel & Jana Friebelová, 2012. "Stochastic analysis of maintenance process costs in the IT industry: a case study," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(3), pages 393-408, September.
    6. Singh, Vijay P. & Oh, Juik, 2015. "A Tsallis entropy-based redundancy measure for water distribution networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 360-376.
    7. Joshua C. C. Chan & Liana Jacobi & Dan Zhu, 2022. "An automated prior robustness analysis in Bayesian model comparison," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 583-602, April.
    8. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio, 2013. "Uncertainty Analysis in Fault Tree Models with Dependent Basic Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1146-1173, June.
    9. Duc Manh Nguyen & Hoai An Le Thi & Tao Pham Dinh, 2014. "Solving the Multidimensional Assignment Problem by a Cross-Entropy method," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 808-823, May.
    10. Jasmit Shah & Somnath Datta & Susmita Datta, 2014. "A multi-loss super regression learner (MSRL) with application to survival prediction using proteomics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1749-1767, December.
    11. Jon T Selvik & Eirik B Abrahamsen, 2017. "On the meaning of accuracy and precision in a risk analysis context," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 91-100, April.
    12. N-H Shih, 2005. "Estimating completion-time distribution in stochastic activity networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 744-749, June.
    13. Ali Eshragh & Jerzy Filar & Michael Haythorpe, 2011. "A hybrid simulation-optimization algorithm for the Hamiltonian cycle problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 103-125, September.
    14. Balesdent, Mathieu & Morio, Jérôme & Marzat, Julien, 2015. "Recommendations for the tuning of rare event probability estimators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 68-78.
    15. Qun Niu & Ming You & Zhile Yang & Yang Zhang, 2021. "Economic Emission Dispatch Considering Renewable Energy Resources—A Multi-Objective Cross Entropy Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-33, May.
    16. Gong, Xiao-Li & Liu, Xi-Hua & Xiong, Xiong & Zhuang, Xin-Tian, 2018. "Modeling volatility dynamics using non-Gaussian stochastic volatility model based on band matrix routine," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 193-201.
    17. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2023. "Support vector machine in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. J Morio & R Pastel, 2012. "Plug-in estimation of d-dimensional density minimum volume set of a rare event in a complex system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(3), pages 337-345, June.
    19. Marco Bee & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani & Flavio Santi, 2015. "A Cross-Entropy approach to the estimation of Generalised Linear Multilevel Models," DEM Working Papers 2015/04, Department of Economics and Management.
    20. Charles Audet & Jean Bigeon & Romain Couderc, 2021. "Combining Cross-Entropy and MADS Methods for Inequality Constrained Global Optimization," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:queues:v:82:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11134-015-9458-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.