IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v58y2024i4d10.1007_s11135-023-01799-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the dynamic of government expenditures for disability and other social benefits: evidence from a Lotka–Volterra model for the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Natalie Focacci

    (LENTIC, HEC Liège)

  • Peter Mascini

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Romke Veen

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

In the Netherlands, access to disability insurance has become gradually more limited and demanding. The same holds for sheltered work. This puts disabled workers, and especially those with no working history, in disadvantaged competition with the non-disabled segment of the working population. In this study, we employ a Lotka–Volterra competition model based on differential equations to investigate how government expenditures for disability and other social benefits interacted in the period between 2010 and 2018. We contribute to the literature by showing that public expenditure for disability is not autonomous and that its competitive power in the social protection ecosystem changes both in type and over time. Our findings suggest that government expenditure for disability benefits in the Netherlands behaved both as prey in favour and predator at the cost of social exclusion and unemployment benefits. Reforms that took place in the ecosystem of interest are used to interpret such behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Natalie Focacci & Peter Mascini & Romke Veen, 2024. "Understanding the dynamic of government expenditures for disability and other social benefits: evidence from a Lotka–Volterra model for the Netherlands," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3403-3415, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01799-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01799-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01799-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01799-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koning, Pierre & van Sonsbeek, Jan-Maarten, 2017. "Making disability work? The effects of financial incentives on partially disabled workers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 202-215.
    2. Miralles, Cristobal & Garcia-Sabater, Jose Pedro & Andres, Carlos & Cardos, Manuel, 2007. "Advantages of assembly lines in Sheltered Work Centres for Disabled. A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 187-197, October.
    3. Goran Dominioni & Alberto Quintavalla & Alessandro Romano, 2020. "Trust spillovers among national and European institutions," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(2), pages 276-293, June.
    4. Chiara Natalie Focacci, 2023. "Old versus young: How much do countries spend on social benefits? Deterministic modeling for government expenditure," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 363-377, February.
    5. Lieske van der Torre & Menno Fenger, 2014. "Policy innovations for including disabled people in the labour market: A study of innovative practices of Dutch sheltered work companies," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(2), pages 67-84, April.
    6. Jan-Maarten van Sonsbeek & Raymond H. J. M. Gradus, 2013. "Estimating the effects of recent disability reforms in the Netherlands," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 65(4), pages 832-855, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koning Pierre & Vethaak Heike, 2021. "Decomposing Employment Trends of Disabled Workers," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(4), pages 1217-1255, October.
    2. Tunga Kantarcı & Jan‐Maarten van Sonsbeek & Yi Zhang, 2023. "The heterogeneous impact of stricter criteria for disability insurance," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(9), pages 1898-1920, September.
    3. Adriano Cordisco & Riccardo Melloni & Lucia Botti, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy for the Integration of Disadvantaged People: A Preliminary Study on the Reuse of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Oskar Mittag & Toomas Kotkas & Christina Reese & Hanna Kampling & Henning Groskreutz & Wouter Boer & Felix Welti, 2018. "Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(9), pages 1081-1088, December.
    5. Silvia Garcia Mandico & Pilar (P.) Garcia-Gomez & Anne (A.C.) Gielen & Owen (O.A.) O'Donnell, 2018. "Earnings responses to disability benefit cuts," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-023/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Matthew J. Hill & Jose I. Silva & Judit Vall Castello, 2019. "Act now: The effects of the 2008 Spanish disability reform," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 906-920, July.
    7. de Groot, Nynke & Koning, Pierre, 2016. "Assessing the effects of disability insurance experience rating. The case of The Netherlands," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 304-317.
    8. Konle-Seidl, Regina, 2017. "Retention and re-integration of older workers into the labour market: What works?," IAB-Discussion Paper 201717, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    9. Kyyrä, Tomi & Paukkeri, Tuuli, 2018. "Does experience rating reduce sickness and disability claims? Evidence from policy kinks," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 178-192.
    10. Pierre Koning, 2016. "Privatizing sick pay: Does it work?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 324-324, December.
    11. Sebnem Demirkol Akyol & Adil Baykasoğlu, 2019. "A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 557-573, February.
    12. Pilar García‐Gómez & Anne C. Gielen, 2018. "Mortality effects of containing moral hazard: Evidence from disability insurance reform," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 606-621, March.
    13. van Sonsbeek, Jan-Maarten & Alblas, Ridwan, 2012. "Disability benefit microsimulation models in the Netherlands," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 700-715.
    14. Richard Burkhauser & Mary Daly & Duncan McVicar & Roger Wilkins, 2014. "Disability benefit growth and disability reform in the US: lessons from other OECD nations," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, December.
    15. Marion Ellison & Vittorio Sergi & Nicola Giannelli, 2017. "An In-Depth Analysis of the Relationship Between Policy Making Processes, Forms of Governance and the Impact of selected Labour Market Innovations in twelve European Labour Market Settings," Working Papers 1701, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2017.
    16. Andersson, Josefine, 2018. "Financial incentives to work for disability insurance recipients - Sweden’s special rules for continuous deduction," Working Paper Series 2018:7, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    17. Chiara Natalie Focacci, 2023. "Old versus young: How much do countries spend on social benefits? Deterministic modeling for government expenditure," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 363-377, February.
    18. Kools, Lieke & Koning, Pierre, 2019. "Graded return-to-work as a stepping stone to full work resumption," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 189-209.
    19. Sebnem Demirkol Akyol & Adil Baykasoğlu, 2019. "ErgoALWABP: a multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem under ergonomic risk factors," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 291-302, January.
    20. Ying Zhang & Sriram Narayanan & Tharo Soun & Kalyanmoy Deb & Dustin Cole, 2023. "Maximizing disability diversity, language diversity, and productivity: A study in apparel manufacturing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 3783-3800, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Differential equations; Disability; Government expenditure; Lotka–Volterra; Netherlands; Public policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J48 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Particular Labor Markets; Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:58:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01799-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.