IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i4d10.1007_s11135-022-01465-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Science and Social Science Differ? Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) of the Willingness to Continue Online Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Hafaz Ngah

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Nurul Izni Kamalrulzaman

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Mohamad Firdaus Halimi Mohamad

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Rosyati Abdul Rashid

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Nor Omaima Harun

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
    Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Nur Asma Ariffin

    (Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
    Universiti Malaysia Terengganu)

  • Noor Azuan Abu Osman

    (University of Malaya)

Abstract

Without proper preparation by higher institutions, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced the world to rely on online learning. Even students of social science and science are looking for different knowledge and skills. Currently, both groups rely on the same method to gather knowledge for future undertakings. Given the uncertainty regarding the resolution of COVID-19, which has driven students to continue using online learning, the current study aims to identify the factors of willingness to continue online learning among social science and pure science students by extending the use of expectation-confirmation theory. Applying a purposive sampling method, 2,215 questionnaires were collected among undergraduate students from Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT) using an online survey. Current study found that expectation and confirmation positively affect satisfaction. Attitude, satisfaction and readiness were found to have a positive relationship with willingness to continue online learning. Meanwhile, self-efficacy was found unsupported hypothesis for the direct effect. For multigroup analysis, readiness was found to have a significant difference between students of social science and pure science. The findings of this research enrich the literature about online learning, especially in the COVID-19 setting. Moreover, this work is useful for higher education institutions seeking to design a better strategy that allows students to return to campus.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Hafaz Ngah & Nurul Izni Kamalrulzaman & Mohamad Firdaus Halimi Mohamad & Rosyati Abdul Rashid & Nor Omaima Harun & Nur Asma Ariffin & Noor Azuan Abu Osman, 2023. "Do Science and Social Science Differ? Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) of the Willingness to Continue Online Learning," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 2957-2980, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01465-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01465-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01465-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-022-01465-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Muhammad Ashfaq & Jiang Yun & Abdul Waheed & Muhammad Shahid Khan & Muhammad Farrukh, 2019. "Customers’ Expectation, Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention of Used Products Online: Empirical Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    3. Ya-Hui Wang, 2017. "Expectation, Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention – Evidence from Taiwan’s Medical Tourism Industry," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 1-1.
    4. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Habuba Halima & Yongjun Li & Usman Ghani & Ataullah Kiani & Atamba Cynthia, 2021. "Impact of Online Crisis Response Strategies on Online Purchase Intention: The Roles of Online Brand Attitude and Brand Perceived Usefulness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    2. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Heena Thanki & Sweety Shah & Harishchandra Singh Rathod & Ankit D. Oza & Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, 2022. "I Am Ready to Invest in Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) Options Only If the Returns Are Not Compromised: Individual Investors’ Intentions toward SRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Mainardes, Emerson Wagner & Coutinho, Ananda Raquel Silva & Alves, Helena Maria Batista, 2023. "The influence of the ethics of E-retailers on online customer experience and customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Christian Linder & Michael Nippa, 2019. "Jumping in at the deep end! The role of motivational forces in starting a new venture," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1363-1391, December.
    7. Hussein-Elhakim Al Issa, 2020. "The Influence of Education and Environmental Support on Entrepreneurial Intentions," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 946-965.
    8. Li, Fajin & Cheng-Xi Aw, Eugene & Wei-Han Tan, Garry & Cham, Tat-Huei & Ooi, Keng-Boon, 2022. "The Eureka moment in understanding luxury brand purchases! A non-linear fsQCA-ANN approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Lukasz Andrzej Derdowski & Åsa Helen Grahn & Håvard Hansen & Heidi Skeiseid, 2020. "The New Ecological Paradigm, Pro-Environmental Behaviour, and the Moderating Effects of Locus of Control and Self-Construal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Ying, Shiyi & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Song, Jinzhu, 2023. "Privacy paradox for location tracking in mobile social networking apps: The perspectives of behavioral reasoning and regulatory focus," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Ana Silva & Elisabete Sá & Joaquim Silva & José Carlos Pinho, 2021. "Dance Is for All: A Social Marketing Intervention with Children and Adolescents to Reduce Prejudice towards Boys Who Dance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Sunmi Yun & Taeuk Kim, 2019. "What Do Coffee Shop Entrepreneurs Need to Do to Raise Pro-Environmental Customer Behavioral Intentions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Hatem El-Gohary & Fahad Sultan & Sayyam Alam & Muzaffar Abbas & Shoaib Muhammad, 2023. "Shaping Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions among Business Graduates in Developing Countries through Social Media Adoption: A Moderating-Mediated Mechanism in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "The Employees’ State of Mind during COVID-19: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Shanmugavel, Nagarajan & Balakrishnan, Janarthanan, 2023. "Influence of pro-environmental behaviour towards behavioural intention of electric vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Dirk C. Moosmayer & Yanyan Chen & Susannah M. Davis, 2019. "Deeds Not Words: A Cosmopolitan Perspective on the Influences of Corporate Sustainability and NGO Engagement on the Adoption of Sustainable Products in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 135-154, August.
    17. Abdul Waheed Siyal & Ding Donghong & Waheed Ali Umrani & Saeed Siyal & Shaharbano Bhand, 2019. "Predicting Mobile Banking Acceptance and Loyalty in Chinese Bank Customers," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    18. Maja Hosta & Vesna Zabkar, 2021. "Antecedents of Environmentally and Socially Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 273-293, June.
    19. Mütterlein, Joschka & Kunz, Reinhard E. & Baier, Daniel, 2019. "Effects of lead-usership on the acceptance of media innovations: A mobile augmented reality case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 113-124.
    20. Ting Chi & Anastasia Frattali & Hang Liu & Yini Chen, 2023. "Regenerated Cellulose Fibers (RCFs) for Future Apparel Sustainability: Insights from the U.S. Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-022-01465-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.