IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i2d10.1007_s11135-021-01144-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological study of mortality by prostate and breast cancer in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Alisson Castro Barreto

    (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM)

  • Tailon Martins

    (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM)

  • Stéfane Dias Rodrigues

    (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM)

  • Adriano Mendonça Souza

    (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – UFSM)

Abstract

This research is a cross-sectional study of the year 2018 that investigates the Brazilian micro-regions with the highest incidence of prostate cancer and breast cancer in women in 2018. It identifies whether the spatial distribution of the mortality rate due to these cancers in the Brazilian micro-regions is interrelated with the variables: oncology referral hospitals, number of oncology specialist doctors, aging rate, urbanization rate, average amount of pesticides used, Gross Domestic Product, and number of mammography devices. Positive spatial autocorrelation was found for the mortality rate from prostate cancer (I = 0.4537; p ≤ 0.001) and breast cancer (I = 0.4842; p ≤ 0.001). The prostate cancer mortality rate has a positive correlation with the aging rate and urbanization rate. The breast cancer mortality rate was positively correlated with the number of specialist doctors, reference hospitals, urbanization rate, and aging rate, but it was negatively correlated with the number of mammography devices. It was an indicative that the higher life expectancy and Western lifestyle have an influence on the increase in mortality from prostate and breast cancer in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Alisson Castro Barreto & Tailon Martins & Stéfane Dias Rodrigues & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2022. "Ecological study of mortality by prostate and breast cancer in Brazil," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 495-509, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01144-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01144-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01144-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01144-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klier, Thomas & McMillen, Daniel P, 2008. "Clustering of Auto Supplier Plants in the United States," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 460-471.
    2. Kelejian, Harry H & Prucha, Ingmar R, 1998. "A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 99-121, July.
    3. Sheila Cristina Rocha-Brischiliari & Luciano Andrade & Oscar Kenji Nihei & Adriano Brischiliari & Michele dos Santos Hortelan & Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho & Sandra Marisa Pelloso, 2018. "Spatial distribution of breast cancer mortality: Socioeconomic disparities and access to treatment in the state of Parana, Brazil," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2018. "An estimator for discrete-choice models with spatial lag dependence using large samples, with an application to land-use conversions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 77-93.
    2. Badi H. Baltagi & Peter H. Egger & Michaela Kesina, 2022. "Bayesian estimation of multivariate panel probits with higher‐order network interdependence and an application to firms' global market participation in Guangdong," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(7), pages 1356-1378, November.
    3. Badi H. Baltagi & Ying Deng & Xiangjun Ma, 2018. "Network effects on labor contracts of internal migrants in China: a spatial autoregressive model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 265-296, August.
    4. Badi H. Baltagi & Peter H. Egger & Michaela Kesina, 2018. "Generalized spatial autocorrelation in a panel-probit model with an application to exporting in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 193-211, August.
    5. Silveira Santos, Luís & Proença, Isabel, 2019. "The inversion of the spatial lag operator in binary choice models: Fast computation and a closed formula approximation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 74-102.
    6. Roger Bivand & Giovanni Millo & Gianfranco Piras, 2021. "A Review of Software for Spatial Econometrics in R," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-40, June.
    7. Songsermsawas, Tisorn & Baylis, Kathy & Chhatre, Ashwini & Michelson, Hope & Prasanna, Satya, 2015. "Friends or traders? Do social networks explain the use of market mechanisms by farmers in India," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211206, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Chuanmin Zhao & Xi Qu, 2022. "Social networks and internal migration in China: A spatial autoregressive model," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 1132-1163, May.
    9. Brasington, David & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2016. "A spatial model of school district open enrollment choice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-18.
    10. Anna Gloria Billé, 2013. "Computational Issues in the Estimation of the Spatial Probit Model: A Comparison of Various Estimators," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2,3), pages 131-154, Winter.
    11. Kelchtermans, Stijn & Neicu, Daniel & Teirlinck, Peter, 2020. "The role of peer effects in firms’ usage of R&D tax exemptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-91.
    12. David J. Lewis & Bradford L. Barham & Brian Robinson, 2011. "Are There Spatial Spillovers in the Adoption of Clean Technology? The Case of Organic Dairy Farming," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(2), pages 250-267.
    13. Anna Gloria Billé & Samantha Leorato, 2017. "Quasi-ML estimation, Marginal Effects and Asymptotics for Spatial Autoregressive Nonlinear Models," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS44, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    14. Tiziano Arduini & Eleonora Patacchini & Edoardo Rainone, 2020. "Treatment Effects With Heterogeneous Externalities," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 826-838, October.
    15. Sandy Fréret & Denis Maguain, 2017. "The effects of agglomeration on tax competition: evidence from a two-regime spatial panel model on French data," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(6), pages 1100-1140, December.
    16. Gupta, Abhimanyu & Robinson, Peter M., 2015. "Inference on higher-order spatial autoregressive models with increasingly many parameters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 19-31.
    17. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    18. Padovano, Fabio & Petrarca, Ilaria, 2014. "Are the responsibility and yardstick competition hypotheses mutually consistent?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 459-477.
    19. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    20. Matthieu Leprince & Sonia Paty & Emmanuelle Reulier, 2005. "Choix d'imposition et interactions spatiales entre collectivités locales. Un test sur les départements français," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 71(1), pages 67-93.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01144-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.