IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v51y2017i4d10.1007_s11135-016-0345-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical appraisal of mixed methods research studies in a systematic scoping review on plural policing: assessing the impact of excluding inadequately reported studies by means of a sensitivity analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antoinette Verhage

    (Ghent University)

  • Dominique Boels

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

A scoping review is a method which is often applied in the systematic review arena. Its aim is to map existing literature in a specific area. Carrying out a scoping review entails dealing with a number of methodological questions that arise during the review. In this paper, we go into the way in which these issues were contemplated upon and dealt with. We particularly focus on how to deal with the critical appraisal of literature (and the use of the outcome of this appraisal in terms of in- or exclusion criteria) and its effects on the contents and outcome of the review. This implies that we will report on the result of a sensitivity analysis. A second methodological issue that is focused on is how to make a review that considers multiple (qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods) designs and how to handle the different types of results that were derived from each method. We conclude by considering the pros and cons of including inadequately reported studies and plea to inform readers on the quality of literature that was included.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoinette Verhage & Dominique Boels, 2017. "Critical appraisal of mixed methods research studies in a systematic scoping review on plural policing: assessing the impact of excluding inadequately reported studies by means of a sensitivity analys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1449-1468, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:51:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-016-0345-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-016-0345-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-016-0345-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-016-0345-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard J. Green and Michael G. Pollitt, 2008. "Introduction," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yinthe Feys, 2023. "Criminological scoping reviews as part of a student assignment: methodological considerations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2327-2355, June.
    2. Kirsten E. Ries & Harmen Schaap & Anne-Marieke M. J. A. P. Loon & Marijke M. H. Kral & Paulien C. Meijer, 2022. "A literature review of open-ended concept maps as a research instrument to study knowledge and learning," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 73-107, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crispin H. V. Cooper, 2020. "Quantitative Models of Well-Being to Inform Policy: Problems and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Leung, Charles Ka Yui & Ng, Joe Cho Yiu, 2018. "Macro Aspects of Housing," MPRA Paper 93512, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Miroslav Navratil & Andrea Kolkova, 2019. "Decomposition and Forecasting Time Series in the Business Economy Using Prophet Forecasting Model," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(4), pages 26-39.
    4. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Chung-Shing Chan, 2017. "The application of fuzzy sets theory in eco-city classification," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 4-17, February.
    6. Qazi Noor ul Islam & Muhammad Mushtaq & Muhammad Tayyab Alam & Maqsood Alam Bukhari, 2015. "Problems of Teachers and Students due to Implementation of English as Medium of Instruction at Primary Level in Punjab," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 23-26, April.
    7. Salim Bouchentouf & Kheloufi Benabdeli, 2021. "From classical management of industrial risks to hazard prediction methods in Algerian industrial environment; a cyndinic approach [De la gestion classique des risques industriels à la prédiction d," Working Papers hal-03162310, HAL.
    8. Hodge, 2004. "Risks in Public-Private Partnerships: Shifting, Sharing or Shirking?," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 155-179, December.
    9. Thomson, Alana & Darcy, Simon & Pearce, Sonya, 2010. "Ganma theory and third-sector sport-development programmes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Implications for sports management," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 313-330, November.
    10. Melissa Keeley, 2011. "The Green Area Ratio: an urban site sustainability metric," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 937-958, November.
    11. Shipeng Yan & Lizhang Chen & Wenqiong Wu & Zhongxi Fu & Heng Zhang & Zhanzhan Li & Chenchao Fu & Jingsong Mou & Jing Xue & Yingyun Hu, 2015. "Early versus Delayed Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV and Tuberculosis Co-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Berg, Brennan K. & Fuller, Rhema D. & Hutchinson, Michael, 2018. "“But a champion comes out much, much later”: A sport development case study of the 1968 U.S. Olympic team," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 430-442.
    13. Schulenkorf, Nico, 2017. "Managing sport-for-development: Reflections and outlook," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 243-251.
    14. M. Heyvaert & B. Maes & P. Onghena, 2013. "Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 659-676, February.
    15. Manso, Maria & Castro-Gomes, João, 2015. "Green wall systems: A review of their characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 863-871.
    16. Wesseling, Joeri H. & van der Vooren , Alexander, 2016. "Lock-in of mature innovation systems, The transformation toward clean concrete in the Netherlands," Papers in Innovation Studies 2016/17, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    17. Zhang, Xiaoling, 2013. "Going green: Initiatives and technologies in Shanghai World Expo," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 78-88.
    18. Pier Paolo Miglietta & Domenico Morrone, 2018. "Managing Water Sustainability: Virtual Water Flows and Economic Water Productivity Assessment of the Wine Trade between Italy and the Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Rowe, Katie & Shilbury, David & Ferkins, Lesley & Hinckson, Erica, 2016. "Challenges for sport development: Women's entry level cycling participation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 417-430.
    20. Xin Zhou & Hideyuki Mori, 2011. "National institutional response to climate change and stakeholder participation: a comparative study for Asia," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 297-319, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:51:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s11135-016-0345-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.