IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i5p2123-2144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • M. Naqshbandi
  • Sharan Kaur
  • Pin Ma

Abstract

Research suggests that cultural issues can make or mar the open innovation process. In this paper, we thus aim at identifying organizational culture types that enable and retard the two types of open innovation activities: in-bound and out-bound. Data were collected using the questionnaire survey method from 339 middle and top managers working in the Malaysian high-tech sector. Organizational culture emerged as a huge predictor of open innovation. We found that highly integrative culture enables in-bound open innovation, but does not significantly affect out-bound open innovation. Besides, hierarchy culture is found to retard both in-bound and out-bound open innovation. This paper is probably the first to empirically investigate the role of culture in open innovation. The findings fill an important gap in open innovation theory while practical implications extend to managers interested in open innovation adoption in their organizations. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • M. Naqshbandi & Sharan Kaur & Pin Ma, 2015. "What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2123-2144, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:5:p:2123-2144
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0097-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakki Mohr & Robert Spekman, 1994. "Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 135-152, February.
    2. Daniel R. Denison & Aneil K. Mishra, 1995. "Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 204-223, April.
    3. Tsui, Anne S. & Wang, Hui & Xin, Katherine R., 2006. "Organizational Culture in China: An Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 345-376, November.
    4. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    5. Lee, Sungjoo & Park, Gwangman & Yoon, Byungun & Park, Jinwoo, 2010. "Open innovation in SMEs--An intermediated network model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 290-300, March.
    6. David J. Teece, 2003. "Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Essays In Technology Management And Policy Selected Papers of David J Teece, chapter 16, pages 447-474, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Hans B. Thorelli, 1986. "Networks: Between markets and hierarchies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 37-51, January.
    8. Anne S. Tsui & Hui Wang & Katherine R. Xin, 2006. "Organizational Culture in China: An Analysis of Culture Dimensions and Culture Types," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(3), pages 345-376, November.
    9. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    10. Thomas Hatzichronoglou, 1997. "Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shazia Parveen & Iqra Abdullah & Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Shazia Qayuum, 2023. "Reconnoitering the Nexus Between Organizational Culture and Open Innovation Systems," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    2. Erkan Taskiran & Canan Cetin & Ata Ozdemirci & Baki Aksu & Meri Istoriti, 2017. "The Effect of the Harmony between Organizational Culture and Values on Job Satisfaction," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 133-147, May.
    3. Arifa Tanveer & Shihong Zeng & Muhammad Irfan & Rui Peng, 2021. "Do Perceived Risk, Perception of Self-Efficacy, and Openness to Technology Matter for Solar PV Adoption? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Vinit Parida & Pankaj C. Patel & Johan Frishammar & Joakim Wincent, 2017. "Managing the front-end phase of process innovation under conditions of high uncertainty," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1983-2000, September.
    5. Lucia Vigoroso & Roberto Sorrenti & Eugenio Cavallo & Federica Caffaro, 2023. "Non-Profit Organizations as Facilitators of the Sustainable Social Innovation of Firms: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Tao Zhao & Jung-Mo Koo & Min-Jae Lee, 2022. "How Firms Can Improve Sustainable Performance on Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Marek Matejun, 2017. "Characteristic features of small business and large firms: An empirical comparative study," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(4), pages 192-203.
    8. Sami Basly & Yosra Abdelwahed, 2023. "Commitment to Learning and Open Innovation in Family Firms: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Family-to-firm Identity Fit," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2), pages 420-448, July.
    9. Edgar Antonio Sánchez‐Báez & José Fernández‐Serrano & Isidoro Romero, 2020. "Organizational culture and innovation in small businesses in Paraguay," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 233-247, April.
    10. Scaliza, Janaina Aparecida Alves & Jugend, Daniel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Latan, Hengky & Armellini, Fabiano & Twigg, David & Andrade, Darly Fernando, 2022. "Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 264-279.
    11. Purevdulam Altantsetseg & Kun-Cheng Chen & Man-Ling Chang, 2017. "Male and female leaders’ entrepreneurial leadership: A comparative study of Mongolia, Taiwan and Thailand on leader-member exchange," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(3), pages 145-153.
    12. Zhang, Xiaobin & Chu, Zhaofang & Ren, Lei & Xing, Jianguo, 2023. "Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    13. Liviu Ilies & Daniel Metz, 2017. "Organizational Culture: Key Issues. A Literature Review," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 797-805, July.
    14. Burawat Piyachat, 2017. "The relationships among resources’ commitment reverse logistics innovation reverse logistics performance and reverse logistics cost savings: Manufacturing vs service industry," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 3(3), pages 122-135.
    15. Lopes, Ana Paula Vilas Boas Viveiros & de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro, 2018. "Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 284-298.
    16. Zeng, Shihong & Tanveer, Arifa & Fu, Xiaolan & Gu, Yuxiao & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "Modeling the influence of critical factors on the adoption of green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. M. Muzamil Naqshbandi, 2018. "Organizational Characteristics and Engagement in Open Innovation: Is There a Link?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Eun-Hwa Seo & Choo-Yeon Kim & Kwangsoo Kim, 2020. "A Study on the Mechanisms Linking Environmental Dynamism to Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Zhenqian He & Ming Xu, 2017. "Research on the Dynamic Mechanism of Enterprise Synergy Innovation: A Literature Review," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 141-141, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Muzamil Naqshbandi, 2018. "Organizational Characteristics and Engagement in Open Innovation: Is There a Link?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 1-20, June.
    2. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500117 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2014. "Le rôle de la gouvernance des clusters dans les capacités dynamiques d’absorption des PME," Post-Print hal-01133514, HAL.
    4. Claude Ménard, 2012. "Hybrid Modes of Organization. Alliances, Joint Ventures, Networks, and Other 'Strange' Animals," Post-Print halshs-00624291, HAL.
    5. repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-00624291 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Morgulis-Yakushev, Sergey & Yildiz, H. Emre & Fey, Carl. F., 2018. "When same is (not) the aim: A treatise on organizational cultural fit and knowledge transfer," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 151-163.
    7. Jiang, Fuming & Travaglione, Tony & Liu, Li Xian & Li, Jizhong, 2021. "When does the global mindset affect headquarters–subsidiary relationships?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 523-542.
    8. Oliver Schilke & Bernd W. Wirtz, 2008. "Allianzfähigkeit — Eine Analyse zur Operationalisierung und Erfolgswirkung im Kontext von F&E-Allianzen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 479-516, August.
    9. Hagedoorn, John & Link, Albert N. & Vonortas, Nicholas S., 2000. "Research partnerships1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 567-586, April.
    10. Kaja Prystupa, 2017. "The Role of Organizational Culture in KnowledgeManagement in Small Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 151-173.
    11. Juelin Yin & Yuli Zhang, 2012. "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 301-316, December.
    12. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    13. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.
    14. Wixe, Sofia & Nilsson, Pia & Naldi, Lucia & Westlund, Hans, 2017. "Disentangling Innovation in Small Food Firms: The role of External Knowledge, Support, and Collaboration," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 446, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    15. Bai, Yuntao & Lin, Li & Li, Peter Ping, 2016. "How to enable employee creativity in a team context: A cross-level mediating process of transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3240-3250.
    16. Mark Nissen, 2000. "Agent‐based supply chain disintermediation versus re‐intermediation: economic and technological perspectives," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 237-256, December.
    17. A. Lasagni, 2011. "European SMEs, external relationships and innovation: some empirical evidence," Economics Department Working Papers 2011-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    18. Soda, Giuseppe & Zaheer, Akbar & Sun, Xiaoming & Cui, Wentian, 2021. "Brokerage evolution in innovation contexts: Formal structure, network neighborhoods and knowledge," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    19. Grillitsch, Markus & Nilsson , Magnus, 2013. "Technological competencies and firm performance: Analyzing the importance of internal and external competencies," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/24, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Hyejin Jang & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon, 2017. "Development Of An Open Innovation Model For R&D Collaboration Between Large Firms And Small-Medium Enterprises (Smes) In Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-29, January.
    21. Toth, Jozsef & Dries, Liesbeth & Pascucci, Stefano, 2013. "Open or Not Open? (Open Innovation in the Hungarian Wine Industry)," 87th Annual Conference, April 8-10, 2013, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 158850, Agricultural Economics Society.
    22. Flier, B. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W. & Baden-Fuller, C.W.F., 2004. "Investigating Strategic Renewal of Five Large Dutch Financial Services Firms," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2004-032-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:5:p:2123-2144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.