IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231200319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconnoitering the Nexus Between Organizational Culture and Open Innovation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Shazia Parveen
  • Iqra Abdullah
  • Muhammad Imran Qureshi
  • Muhammad Umar Farooq
  • Shazia Qayuum

Abstract

Postmodern organizations strive to cultivate open innovation systems to foster product innovation and commercialization. Cultural dynamics can be a massive obstacle in flourishing the inbound and outbound open innovation in many organizations. However, little is known about the effect of different types of culture on the open innovation dimensions. This research aimed to investigate the role of cultural subtleties in nurturing inbound and outbound open innovation in the organizations. A quantitative research design was employed, and data were collected from a random sample of 231 managers from the automotive industry. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses using Smart PLS. The results indicated that hierarchy culture, associated with formal rules and regulations, negatively affects the inbound and outbound open innovation. The Market culture has a positive relationship with inbound and outbound open innovation while adhocracy culture could positively impact the inbound open innovation only. On the other hand, clan culture has a negative effect on the outbound open innovation. We concluded that the organizational culture focused on internal integrations is more suitable for outbound open innovation, and the type of organizational culture focused on external differentiation is more likely to support inbound open innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shazia Parveen & Iqra Abdullah & Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Shazia Qayuum, 2023. "Reconnoitering the Nexus Between Organizational Culture and Open Innovation Systems," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200319
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231200319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231200319
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231200319?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. David J. Teece, 2003. "Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Essays In Technology Management And Policy Selected Papers of David J Teece, chapter 16, pages 447-474, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Jürgen Kai-Uwe Brock, 2021. "The emergence and implications of Technologized Marketing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 372-391, July.
    4. Zanon, Lucas Gabriel & Marcelloni, Francesco & Gerolamo, Mateus Cecílio & Ribeiro Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar, 2021. "Exploring the relations between supply chain performance and organizational culture: A fuzzy grey group decision model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Bitencourt, Claudia Cristina & de Oliveira Santini, Fernando & Ladeira, Wagner Junior & Santos, Ana Clarissa & Teixeira, Eduardo Kunzel, 2020. "The extended dynamic capabilities model: A meta-analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 108-120.
    6. Gregory, Brian T. & Harris, Stanley G. & Armenakis, Achilles A. & Shook, Christopher L., 2009. "Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 673-679, July.
    7. M. Naqshbandi & Sharan Kaur & Pin Ma, 2015. "What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 2123-2144, September.
    8. Sung Ook Park & Seung Uk Choi & Seong Tae Kim & Hyung Jong Na, 2021. "The Relationship between Corporate Culture and Value at Different Life Cycle Stages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    10. Henkel, Joachim & Schöberl, Simone & Alexy, Oliver, 2014. "The emergence of openness: How and why firms adopt selective revealing in open innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 879-890.
    11. Aija Leiponen & Constance E. Helfat, 2010. "Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 224-236, February.
    12. Muhammad Imran Qureshi & Shazia Parveen & Iqra Abdullah & Léo-Paul Dana, 2021. "Reconceptualizing the interventions of open innovation systems between the nexus of quadruple organization cultural dynamics and performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1661-1681, October.
    13. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    14. X. Lecocq & B. Demil, 2006. "Strategizing industry structure: the case of open systems in a low-tech industry," Post-Print hal-00185305, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Nissen, 2000. "Agent‐based supply chain disintermediation versus re‐intermediation: economic and technological perspectives," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 237-256, December.
    2. Caloghirou, Yannis & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2021. "Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    3. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Fernando Ribeiro Serra & Emerson Maccari, 2013. "When the innovator fails to capture rents from innovation," Working Papers 101, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    4. Yu Zhou & Guangjian Liu & Xiaoxi Chang & Ying Hong, 2021. "Top-down, bottom-up or outside-in? An examination of triadic mechanisms on firm innovation in Chinese firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 131-162, February.
    5. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Sungu Armagan & Dan Li, 2007. "Vertical Integration For Full Outsourcing: Growth And Internationalization Of A Portuguese Packaging Firm," Working Papers 4, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    6. Riviere, Monica & Suder, Gabriele, 2016. "Perspectives on strategic internationalization: Developing capabilities for renewal," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 847-858.
    7. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Ouyang, Huimin & Park, Chansoo & Oh, Chang Hoon, 2024. "The impact of reverse knowledge transfers on exploitative and exploratory innovations in MNCs: The role of knowledge distance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    9. Zhang, Xiaobin & Chu, Zhaofang & Ren, Lei & Xing, Jianguo, 2023. "Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    10. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Fernando A. Ribeiro Serra, 2008. "Open and closed industry clusters: The social structure of innovation," Working Papers 24, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    11. Hallberg, Niklas L. & Brattström, Anna, 2019. "Concealing or revealing? Alternative paths to profiting from innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 165-174.
    12. Teece, David J., 2006. "Reflections on "Profiting from Innovation"," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1131-1146, October.
    13. Lopes, Ana Paula Vilas Boas Viveiros & de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro, 2018. "Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 284-298.
    14. Walsh, John P. & Lee, You-Na & Nagaoka, Sadao, 2016. "Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1660-1671.
    15. Teece, David J., 2010. "Technological Innovation and the Theory of the Firm," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 679-730, Elsevier.
    16. Elizabeth G. Pontikes & William P. Barnett, 2017. "The Coevolution of Organizational Knowledge and Market Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 64-82, March.
    17. Fan, Shuangrui & Wang, Cong, 2021. "Firm age, ultimate ownership, and R&D investments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1245-1264.
    18. Peeters, T.J.G., 2013. "External knowledge search and use in new product development," Other publications TiSEM 300ebb34-b090-4210-b95e-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    20. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.