Item Complexity: A Neglected Psychometric Feature of Test Items?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-022-09842-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Weeks, Jonathan P., 2010. "plink: An R Package for Linking Mixed-Format Tests Using IRT-Based Methods," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 35(i12).
- Xiangyi Liao & Daniel M. Bolt, 2021. "Item Characteristic Curve Asymmetry: A Better Way to Accommodate Slips and Guesses Than a Four-Parameter Model?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 753-775, December.
- Sora Lee & Daniel M. Bolt, 2018. "Asymmetric Item Characteristic Curves and Item Complexity: Insights from Simulation and Real Data Analyses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 453-475, June.
- Wendy Yen, 1985. "Increasing item complexity: A possible cause of scale shrinkage for unidimensional item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 399-410, December.
- Kevin Lang, 2010.
"Measurement Matters: Perspectives on Education Policy from an Economist and School Board Member,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 167-182, Summer.
- Kevin Lang, 2010. "Measurement Matters: Perspectives on Education Policy from an Economist and School Board Member," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 143, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
- Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
- Fumiko Samejima, 2000. "Logistic positive exponent family of models: Virtue of asymmetric item characteristic curves," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 319-335, September.
- Wan, Sirui & Bond, Timothy N. & Lang, Kevin & Clements, Douglas H. & Sarama, Julie & Bailey, Drew H., 2021. "Is intervention fadeout a scaling artefact?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
- Dale Ballou, 2009. "Test Scaling and Value-Added Measurement," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 4(4), pages 351-383, October.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Alexander Robitzsch, 2024. "Estimation of Standard Error, Linking Error, and Total Error for Robust and Nonrobust Linking Methods in the Two-Parameter Logistic Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, June.
- Xiangyi Liao & Daniel M. Bolt, 2021. "Item Characteristic Curve Asymmetry: A Better Way to Accommodate Slips and Guesses Than a Four-Parameter Model?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 753-775, December.
- González, Jorge, 2014. "SNSequate: Standard and Nonstandard Statistical Models and Methods for Test Equating," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(i07).
- Koedel Cory & Leatherman Rebecca & Parsons Eric, 2012.
"Test Measurement Error and Inference from Value-Added Models,"
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-37, November.
- Cory Koedel & Rebecca Leatherman & Eric Parsons, 2012. "Test Measurement Error and Inference from Value-Added Models," Working Papers 1201, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
- Seth Gershenson, 2016.
"Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence From Teacher Absences,"
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 615-638, June.
- Seth Gershenson, 2015. "Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence from Teacher Absences," Upjohn Working Papers 15-217, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
- Gershenson, Seth, 2015. "Performance Standards and Employee Effort: Evidence from Teacher Absences," IZA Discussion Papers 9203, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Sonia Bhalotra & Martin Karlsson & Therese Nilsson & Nina Schwarz, 2022.
"Infant Health, Cognitive Performance, and Earnings: Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(6), pages 1138-1156, November.
- Bhalotra, Sonia R. & Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Schwarz, Nina, 2016. "Infant Health, Cognitive Performance and Earnings: Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden," IZA Discussion Papers 10339, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Bhalotra, Sonia & Martin Karlsson & Therese Nilsson & Schwarz, Nina, 2021. "Infant Health, Cognitive Performance and Earnings : Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1345, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
- Bhalotra, S.; & Karlsson, M.; & Nilsson, T.; & Schwarz, N.;, 2018. "Infant Health, Cognitive Performance and Earnings: Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 18/06, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
- Karlsson, Martin & Schwarz, Nina & Bhalotra, Sonia & Nilsson, Therese, 2018. "Infant Health, Cognitive Performance and Earnings: Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181577, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Bhalotra, Sonia & Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Schwarz, Nina, 2022. "Infant health, cognitive performance and earnings: Evidence from inception of the welfare state in Sweden," CEPR Discussion Papers 17257, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bhalotra, Sonia & Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Schwarz, Nina, 2019. "Infant health, cognitive performance and earnings: evidence from inception of the welfare state in Sweden," ISER Working Paper Series 2019-05, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
- Bhalotra, Sonia & Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Schwarz, Nina, 2017. "Infant Health, Cognitive Performance and Earnings: Evidence from Inception of the Welfare State in Sweden," Working Paper Series 1177, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
- Nirav Mehta, 2019.
"Measuring quality for use in incentive schemes: The case of “shrinkage” estimators,"
Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 1537-1577, November.
- Nirav Mehta, 2017. "Targeting the Wrong Teachers? Linking Measurement with Theory to Evaluate Teacher Incentive Schemes," University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP) Working Papers 20171, University of Western Ontario, Centre for Human Capital and Productivity (CHCP).
- Dickerson, Andy & Ratcliffe, Anita & Rohenkohl, Bertha & Van de Sijpe, Nicolas, 2024.
"Anticipated labour market discrimination and educational achievement,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 375-393.
- Andy Dickerson & Anita Ratcliffe & Bertha Rohenkohl & Nicolas Van de Sijpe, 2022. "Anticipated labour market discrimination and educational achievement," Working Papers 2022017, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics.
- Sora Lee & Daniel M. Bolt, 2018. "Asymmetric Item Characteristic Curves and Item Complexity: Insights from Simulation and Real Data Analyses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 453-475, June.
- Peter Bickel & Steven Buyske & Huahua Chang & Zhiliang Ying, 2001. "On maximizing item information and matching difficulty with ability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 69-77, March.
- Derek C. Briggs & Ben Domingue, 2013. "The Gains From Vertical Scaling," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(6), pages 551-576, December.
- Alexander Robitzsch, 2020. "L p Loss Functions in Invariance Alignment and Haberman Linking with Few or Many Groups," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-38, August.
- Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2024. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Papers 2405.00161, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
- Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
- Gadi Barlevy & Derek Neal, 2012.
"Pay for Percentile,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(5), pages 1805-1831, August.
- Gadi Barlevy & Derek Neal, 2009. "Pay for percentile," Working Paper Series WP-09-09, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
- Barlevy, Gadi & Neal, Derek, 2009. "Pay for Percentile," IZA Discussion Papers 4383, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Gadi Barlevy & Derek Neal, 2011. "Pay for Percentile," NBER Working Papers 17194, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Donald Boyd & Hamilton Lankford & Susanna Loeb & James Wyckoff, 2013. "Measuring Test Measurement Error," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(6), pages 629-663, December.
- Brendan Houng & Moshe Justman, 2013. "Comparing Least-Squares Value-Added Analysis and Student Growth Percentile Analysis for Evaluating Student Progress and Estimating School Effects," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n07, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- David M. Quinn & Andrew D. Ho, 2021. "Ordinal Approaches to Decomposing Between-Group Test Score Disparities," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(4), pages 466-500, August.
- J. R. Lockwood & Daniel F. McCaffrey, 2014. "Correcting for Test Score Measurement Error in ANCOVA Models for Estimating Treatment Effects," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(1), pages 22-52, February.
- Timothy N. Bond & Kevin Lang, 2013.
"The Evolution of the Black-White Test Score Gap in Grades K–3: The Fragility of Results,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1468-1479, December.
- Timothy N. Bond & Kevin Lang, 2012. "The Evolution of the Black-White Test Score Gap in Grades K-3: The Fragility of Results," NBER Working Papers 17960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
More about this item
Keywords
Item complexity; Item response theory;Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:87:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11336-022-09842-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.