IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v84y2019i3d10.1007_s11336-019-09677-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • Edward E. Rigdon

    (Georgia State University)

  • Jan-Michael Becker

    (University of Cologne)

  • Marko Sarstedt

    (Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg
    Monash University Malaysia)

Abstract

Parceling—using composites of observed variables as indicators for a common factor—strengthens loadings, but reduces the number of indicators. Factor indeterminacy is reduced when there are many observed variables per factor, and when loadings and factor correlations are strong. It is proven that parceling cannot reduce factor indeterminacy. In special cases where the ratio of loading to residual variance is the same for all items included in each parcel, factor indeterminacy is unaffected by parceling. Otherwise, parceling worsens factor indeterminacy. While factor indeterminacy does not affect the parameter estimates, standard errors, or fit indices associated with a factor model, it does create uncertainty, which endangers valid inference.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward E. Rigdon & Jan-Michael Becker & Marko Sarstedt, 2019. "Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 772-780, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:84:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-019-09677-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09677-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-019-09677-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-019-09677-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Schönemann & Ming-Mei Wang, 1972. "Some new results on factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 61-91, March.
    2. James Steiger, 1979. "The relationship between external variables and common factors," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(1), pages 93-97, March.
    3. Anders Skrondal & Petter Laake, 2001. "Regression among factor scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 563-575, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majid Ghasemy & Hazri Jamil & James E. Gaskin, 2021. "Have your cake and eat it too: PLSe2 = ML + PLS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 497-541, April.
    2. Richter, Nicole Franziska & Tudoran, Ana Alina, 2024. "Elevating theoretical insight and predictive accuracy in business research: Combining PLS-SEM and selected machine learning algorithms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Chau Minh Nguyen & Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Yany Grégoire & Renaud Legoux, 2024. "Striking the Right Notes: Long- and Short-Term Financial Impacts of Musicians’ Charity Advocacy Versus Other Signaling Types," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 217-233, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niels G. Waller, 2023. "Breaking Our Silence on Factor Score Indeterminacy," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(2), pages 244-261, April.
    2. Dennis Cook, R. & Forzani, Liliana, 2023. "On the role of partial least squares in path analysis for the social sciences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Anastasiia Laskovaia & Galina Shirokova & Michael H. Morris, 2017. "National culture, effectuation, and new venture performance: global evidence from student entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 687-709, October.
    4. Marco Castillo & John A. List & Ragan Petrie & Anya Samek, 2024. "Detecting Drivers of Behavior at an Early Age: Evidence from a Longitudinal Field Experiment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(12), pages 3942-3977.
    5. Janne Petersen & Karen Bandeen-Roche & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Klaus Groes Larsen, 2012. "Predicting Latent Class Scores for Subsequent Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 244-262, April.
    6. Tatiana Beliaeva & Galina Shirokova & William Wales & Elena Gafforova, 2020. "Benefiting from economic crisis? Strategic orientation effects, trade-offs, and configurations with resource availability on SME performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 165-194, March.
    7. Bernal, Pedro & Mittag, Nikolas & Qureshi, Javaeria A., 2016. "Estimating effects of school quality using multiple proxies," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Ke-Hai Yuan & Zhiyong Zhang & Lijuan Wang, 2024. "Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Estimating and Testing the Mediation Effect: Structural Equation Modeling versus Path Analysis with Weighted Composites," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 974-1006, September.
    9. Wu, Jianmin & Bentler, Peter M., 2013. "Limited information estimation in binary factor analysis: A review and extension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 392-403.
    10. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    11. Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani & Andreas Stenling & Esther Izett & Eleanor Quested, 2022. "Personality, Risk Perceptions, and Health Behaviors: A Two-Wave Study on Reciprocal Relations in Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Wayne Velicer, 1976. "Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(3), pages 321-327, September.
    13. Mihretie, Fekremariam Asargew & Tsunekawa, Atsushi & Haregeweyn, Nigussie & Adgo, Enyew & Tsubo, Mitsuru & Masunaga, Tsugiyuki & Meshesha, Derege Tsegaye & Ebabu, Kindiye & Nigussie, Zerihun & Sato, S, 2022. "Exploring teff yield variability related with farm management and soil property in contrasting agro-ecologies in Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Heijdra Suasnabar, Jan M. & Finch, Aureliano Paolo & Mulhern, Brendan & van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske, 2024. "Exploring the measurement of health related quality of life and broader instruments: A dimensionality analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    15. Marie-Ann Sengewald & Steffi Pohl, 2019. "Compensation and Amplification of Attenuation Bias in Causal Effect Estimates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 589-610, June.
    16. Seohee Park & Seongeun Kim & Ji Hoon Ryoo, 2020. "Latent Class Regression Utilizing Fuzzy Clusterwise Generalized Structured Component Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Roderick McDonald, 1974. "The measurement of factor indeterminacy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 39(2), pages 203-222, June.
    18. Anindita Chakravarty & Rajdeep Grewal & V. Sambamurthy, 2013. "Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 976-997, December.
    19. Lu, Irene R.R. & Kwan, Ernest & Thomas, D. Roland & Cedzynski, Marzena, 2011. "Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 258-268.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:84:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-019-09677-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.